REVIEW 2 cited by
Ground-state isolation and discrete flows in a rationally extended quantum harmonic oscillator
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Ladder operators for the simplest version of a rationally extended quantum harmonic oscillator (REQHO) are constructed by applying a Darboux transformation to the quantum harmonic oscillator system. It is shown that the physical spectrum of the REQHO carries a direct sum of a trivial and an infinite-dimensional irreducible representation of the polynomially deformed bosonized osp(1|2) superalgebra. In correspondence with this the ground state of the system is isolated from other physical states but can be reached by ladder operators via non-physical energy eigenstates, which belong to either an infinite chain of similar eigenstates or to the chains with generalized Jordan states. We show that the discrete chains of the states generated by ladder operators and associated with physical energy levels include six basic generalized Jordan states, in comparison with the two basic Jordan states entering in analogous discrete chains for the quantum harmonic oscillator.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Projective Time, Cayley Transformations and the Schwarzian Geometry of the Free Particle--Oscillator Correspondence
Projective geometry and Cayley transformations provide a common framework for the free particle-oscillator correspondences via the Schwarzian cocycle.
-
Confining kinks. $\zeta$-regularized one-loop kink mass shifts in exotic field theories
New soliton models ('confining kinks') have purely discrete perturbation spectra; their one-loop mass shifts, computed via zeta-function regularization, are finite and negative without vacuum subtractions.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.