REVIEW 2 cited by
Strong Federations: An Interoperable Blockchain Solution to Centralized Third-Party Risks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Bitcoin, the first peer-to-peer electronic cash system, opened the door to permissionless, private, and trustless transactions. Attempts to repurpose Bitcoin's underlying blockchain technology have run up against fundamental limitations to privacy, faithful execution, and transaction finality. We introduce \emph{Strong Federations}: publicly verifiable, Byzantine-robust transaction networks that facilitate movement of any asset between disparate markets, without requiring third-party trust. \emph{Strong Federations} enable commercial privacy, with support for transactions where asset types and amounts are opaque, while remaining publicly verifiable. As in Bitcoin, execution fidelity is cryptographically enforced; however, \emph{Strong Federations} significantly lower capital requirements for market participants by reducing transaction latency and improving interoperability. To show how this innovative solution can be applied today, we describe \emph{\liquid}: the first implementation of \emph{Strong Federations} deployed in a Financial Market.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Bitcoin as an Interplanetary Monetary Standard with Proof-of-Transit Timestamping
An architecture for interplanetary Bitcoin that keeps Earth's base layer unchanged and adds PoTT, a cryptographically chained, hop-timed receipt layer for dispute evidence across high-latency links.
-
Enhancing Blockchain Cross Chain Interoperability: A Comprehensive Survey
A systematic survey that organizes blockchain cross-chain interoperability techniques into a classification and compares them with industry practice, while identifying open challenges.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.