Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The Elephant in the Room of Density Functional Theory Calculations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1702.00957 v1 pith:ALUXW3WG submitted 2017-02-03 physics.comp-ph cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.chem-ph

classification physics.comp-phcond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.chem-ph
keywords accuracybasisenergieserrorsatomizationchemicaltotalable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Using multiwavelets, we have obtained total energies and corresponding atomization energies for the GGA-PBE and hybrid-PBE0 density functionals for a test set of 211 molecules with an unprecedented and guaranteed $\mu$Hartree accuracy. These quasi-exact references allow us to quantify the accuracy of standard all-electron basis sets that are believed to be highly accurate for molecules, such as Gaussian-type orbitals (GTOs), all-electron numeric atom-centered orbitals (NAOs) and full-potential augmented plane wave (APW) methods. We show that NAOs are able to achieve the so-called chemical accuracy (1 kcal/mol) for the typical basis set sizes used in applications, for both total and atomization energies. For GTOs, a triple-zeta quality basis has mean errors of ~10kcal/mol in total energies, while chemical accuracy is almost reached for a quintuple-zeta basis. Due to systematic error cancellations, atomization energy errors are reduced by almost an order of magnitude, placing chemical accuracy within reach also for medium to large GTO bases, albeit with significant outliers. In order to check the accuracy of the computed densities, we have also investigated the dipole moments, where in general, only the largest NAO and GTO bases are able to yield errors below 0.01 Debye. The observed errors are similar across the different functionals considered here.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Atomic Confinement Potentials and the Generation of Numerical Atomic Orbitals

    physics.comp-ph 2025-05 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    Valence orbitals are largely insensitive to the form of soft confinement, a new exponential potential localizes numerical atomic orbitals faster than polynomial potentials, and FHI-aims singular-potential defaults yie...

Pith tools