REVIEW 2 cited by
Learning to Represent Mechanics via Long-term Extrapolation and Interpolation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
While the basic laws of Newtonian mechanics are well understood, explaining a physical scenario still requires manually modeling the problem with suitable equations and associated parameters. In order to adopt such models for artificial intelligence, researchers have handcrafted the relevant states, and then used neural networks to learn the state transitions using simulation runs as training data. Unfortunately, such approaches can be unsuitable for modeling complex real-world scenarios, where manually authoring relevant state spaces tend to be challenging. In this work, we investigate if neural networks can implicitly learn physical states of real-world mechanical processes only based on visual data, and thus enable long-term physical extrapolation. We develop a recurrent neural network architecture for this task and also characterize resultant uncertainties in the form of evolving variance estimates. We evaluate our setup to extrapolate motion of a rolling ball on bowl of varying shape and orientation using only images as input, and report competitive results with approaches that assume access to internal physics models and parameters.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Neural Re-Simulation for Generating Bounces in Single Images
A neural re-simulation system corrects noisy single-image depth simulations to produce visually plausible multi-bounce ball trajectories in still images.
-
Analyzing the role of tensile and hybrid fractures on the max-imum relief topography
Modeling comparison finds that the Mohr-Coulomb law overestimates maximum escarpment height relative to the modified Griffith criterion, with differences on the order of geological variations.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.