Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Ensembles of Multiple Models and Architectures for Robust Brain Tumour Segmentation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1711.01468 v1 pith:DZ7BG7EE submitted 2017-11-04 cs.CV cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.LG
keywords modelsarchitecturesdeepemmaensembleslearningmethodsmultiple
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep learning approaches such as convolutional neural nets have consistently outperformed previous methods on challenging tasks such as dense, semantic segmentation. However, the various proposed networks perform differently, with behaviour largely influenced by architectural choices and training settings. This paper explores Ensembles of Multiple Models and Architectures (EMMA) for robust performance through aggregation of predictions from a wide range of methods. The approach reduces the influence of the meta-parameters of individual models and the risk of overfitting the configuration to a particular database. EMMA can be seen as an unbiased, generic deep learning model which is shown to yield excellent performance, winning the first position in the BRATS 2017 competition among 50+ participating teams.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Global Planar Convolutions for improved context aggregation in Brain Tumor Segmentation

    eess.IV 2019-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A brain tumor segmentation network using Global Planar Convolution modules matches a deeper residual U-Net on whole-tumor Dice on the BraTS 2018 benchmark using about 35 percent fewer parameters.

Pith tools