Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Bootstrapped synthetic likelihood

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1711.05825 v2 pith:W37Q2JKN submitted 2017-11-15 stat.CO cs.AIphysics.data-anstat.MEstat.ML

classification stat.COcs.AIphysics.data-anstat.MEstat.ML
keywords likelihoodthetaestimatesmeansmodelalgorithmapproachapproximate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) and synthetic likelihood (SL) techniques have enabled the use of Bayesian inference for models that may be simulated, but for which the likelihood cannot be evaluated pointwise at values of an unknown parameter $\theta$. The main idea in ABC and SL is to, for different values of $\theta$ (usually chosen using a Monte Carlo algorithm), build estimates of the likelihood based on simulations from the model conditional on $\theta$. The quality of these estimates determines the efficiency of an ABC/SL algorithm. In standard ABC/SL, the only means to improve an estimated likelihood at $\theta$ is to simulate more times from the model conditional on $\theta$, which is infeasible in cases where the simulator is computationally expensive. In this paper we describe how to use bootstrapping as a means for improving SL estimates whilst using fewer simulations from the model, and also investigate its use in ABC. Further, we investigate the use of the bag of little bootstraps as a means for applying this approach to large datasets, yielding Monte Carlo algorithms that accurately approximate posterior distributions whilst only simulating subsamples of the full data. Examples of the approach applied to i.i.d., temporal and spatial data are given.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Advances in Approximate Bayesian Inference for Models in Epidemiology

    stat.ME 2025-04 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A review of ABC, BSL, INLA, and VI for epidemic modeling, with a decision tree for method selection and hybrid exact-approximate inference proposed as the next frontier.

  2. A review of Approximate Bayesian Computation methods via density estimation: inference for simulator-models

    stat.CO 2019-09 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A review of ABC via density estimation, arguing that machine-learning conditional density estimators are the most promising route to scalable likelihood-free inference.

Pith tools