Optimistic Robust Optimization With Applications To Machine Learning
read the original abstract
Robust Optimization has traditionally taken a pessimistic, or worst-case viewpoint of uncertainty which is motivated by a desire to find sets of optimal policies that maintain feasibility under a variety of operating conditions. In this paper, we explore an optimistic, or best-case view of uncertainty and show that it can be a fruitful approach. We show that these techniques can be used to address a wide variety of problems. First, we apply our methods in the context of robust linear programming, providing a method for reducing conservatism in intuitive ways that encode economically realistic modeling assumptions. Second, we look at problems in machine learning and find that this approach is strongly connected to the existing literature. Specifically, we provide a new interpretation for popular sparsity inducing non-convex regularization schemes. Additionally, we show that successful approaches for dealing with outliers and noise can be interpreted as optimistic robust optimization problems. Although many of the problems resulting from our approach are non-convex, we find that DCA or DCA-like optimization approaches can be intuitive and efficient.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Risk-averse optimization under distributional uncertainty with Rockafellian relaxation
The framework uses Rockafellian relaxation to unify distributionally robust and optimistic optimization for risk-averse PDE-constrained problems.
-
Robustness Measures in Distributionally Robust Optimization
DRO regularizers are worst-case sensitivities of expected cost, supplying a robustness measure that guides uncertainty-set selection and traces performance-robustness frontiers.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.