Pith.

Nuclear Theory · arXiv:1712.00923 v3 · submitted 4 Dec 2017

Temperature dependence of transport coefficients of QCD in high-energy heavy-ion collisions

Kazuhisa Okamoto, Chiho Nonaka

The paper says

“We find that from the comprehensive analyses of centrality dependence of single particle spectra and collective flows we can extract detailed information on the quark-gluon plasma bulk property, without the information being smeared by the final state interactions.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

Using our developed new relativistic viscous hydrodynamics code, we investigate the temperature dependence of shear and bulk viscosities from comparison with the ALICE data: single particle spectra and collective flows of Pb+Pb $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76$ TeV collisions at the Large Hadron Collider. We find that from the comprehensive analyses of centrality dependence of single particle spectra and collective flows we can extract detailed information on the quark-gluon plasma bulk property, without the information being smeared by the final state interactions.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: asserted 0.99

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.11 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.08 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.10 · compares with prior results 0.34 · mentions code or data availability 0.03

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v3). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
Using our developed new relativistic viscous hydrodynamics code, we investigate the temperature dependence of shear and bulk viscosities from comparison with the ALICE data: single particle spectra and collective flows of Pb+Pb $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76$ TeV collisions at the Large Hadron Collider. method 0.57 0.92 0.07 asserted 0.88
We find that from the comprehensive analyses of centrality dependence of single particle spectra and collective flows we can extract detailed information on the quark-gluon plasma bulk property, without the information being smeared by the final state interactions. result 0.75 0.93 0.71 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 0.97 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.65

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v3

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,426 input tokens.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

How the literature uses it

3 arXiv papers cite this in 6 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 3 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 1 paper
Uses its data or values 1 paper
Compares with it 1 paper

What it cites · 62 sentences without a confident label

Contests 4 papers
Uses the method or tool of 16 papers
Uses data or values from 6 papers
Compares with 4 papers
Cites as support 2 papers
Cites as background 16 papers

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment