REVIEW 1 cited by
Ground states of a Klein-Gordon field with Robin boundary conditions in global anti-de Sitter spacetime
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We consider a real, massive scalar field both on the $n$-dimensional anti--de Sitter (AdS$_n$) spacetime and on its universal cover CAdS$_n$. In the second scenario, we extend the recent analysis on PAdS$_n$, the Poincar\'e patch of AdS$_n$, first determining all admissible boundary conditions of Robin type that can be applied on the conformal boundary. Most notably, contrary to what happens on PAdS$_n$, no bound state mode solution occurs. Subsequently, we address the problem of constructing the two-point function for the ground state satisfying the admissible boundary conditions. All these states are locally of Hadamard form being obtained via a mode expansion which encompasses only the positive frequencies associated to the global timelike Killing field on CAdS$_n$. To conclude we investigate under which conditions any of the two-point correlation functions constructed on the universal cover defines a counterpart on AdS$_n$, still of Hadamard form. Since this spacetime is periodic in time, it turns out that this is possible only for Dirichlet boundary conditions, though for a countable set of masses of the underlying field, or for Neumann boundary conditions, though only for even dimensions and for one given value of the mass.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Boundary-to-bulk maps for AdS causal wedges and RG flow
Robin-boundary-condition HKLL smearing functions with spacelike support are constructed in AdS causal wedges and used to map the double-trace-deformed CFT Wightman function to the bulk Robin Wightman function.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.