Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Hill stability in the AMD framework

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1806.08869 v1 pith:X3VDAF3W submitted 2018-06-22 astro-ph.EP

classification astro-ph.EP
keywords hillstabilitystablesystemsplanetssystemapproximationcriterion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

In a two-planet system, due to Sundman (1912) inequality, a topological boundary can forbid close encounters between the two planets for infinite time. A system is said Hill stable if it verifies this topological condition. Hill stability is widely used in the study of extra solar planets dynamics. However people often use the coplanar and circular orbits approximation. In this paper, we explain how the Hill stability can be understood in the framework of Angular Momentum Deficit (AMD). In the secular approximation, the AMD allows to discriminate between a priori stable systems and systems for which a more in depth dynamical analysis is required. We show that the general Hill stability criterion can be expressed as a function of only the semi major axes, the masses and the total AMD of the system. The proposed criterion is only expanded in the planets-to-star mass ratio $\epsilon$ and not in the semi-major axis ratio, in eccentricities nor in the mutual inclination. Moreover the expansion in $\epsilon$ remains excellent up to values of about $10^{-3}$ even for two planets with very different mass values. We performed numerical simulations in order to highlight the sharp change of behaviour between Hill stable and Hill unstable systems. We show that Hill stable systems tend to be very regular whereas Hill unstable ones often lead to rapid planet collisions. We also remind that Hill stability does not protect from the ejection of the outer planet.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 60 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Eccentricities and the Stability of Closely-Spaced Five-Planet Systems

    astro-ph.EP 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Five-planet system lifetimes drop as initial eccentricity grows, but aligned eccentric orbits survive almost as long as circular ones, so relative eccentricity, not absolute eccentricity, controls stability.

  2. Observing a 542-day transiting giant with large TTVs: The 2025 transit of HIP 41378 f and new constraints on the outer system

    astro-ph.EP 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    New 2025 transit timing of HIP 41378 f shows a 7-hour early arrival consistent with TTVs; N-body modeling with TRADES refines ephemerides for planets d, e, and f.

Pith tools