Pith. sign in

REVIEW

On the dynamics of Simulated Quantum Annealing in random Ising chains

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1809.02124 v1 pith:VMLYUYQE submitted 2018-09-06 quant-ph cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.stat-mech

On the dynamics of Simulated Quantum Annealing in random Ising chains

classification quant-ph cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.stat-mech
keywords annealingquantumdynamicscarlocaseisinglargeleads
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

Simulated Quantum Annealing (SQA), that is emulating a Quantum Annealing (QA) dynamics on a classical computer by a Quantum Monte Carlo whose parameters are changed during the simulation, is a well established computational strategy to cope with the exponentially large Hilbert space. It has enjoyed some early successes but has also raised more recent criticisms. Here we investigate, on the paradigmatic case of a one-dimensional transverse field Ising chain, two issues related to SQA in its Path-Integral implementation: the question of Monte Carlo vs physical (Schr\"odinger) dynamics and the issue of the imaginary-time continuum limit to eliminate the Trotter error. We show that, while a proper time-continuum limit is able to restitute the correct Kibble-Zurek scaling of the residual energy $\varepsilon_\mathrm{res}(\tau)\sim \tau^{-1/2}$ for the ordered case --- $\tau$ being the total annealing time ---, the presence of disorder leads to a characteristic sampling crisis for a large number of Trotter time-slices, in the low-temperature ordered phase. Such sampling problem, in turn, leads to SQA results which are apparently unrelated to the coherent Schr\"odinger QA even at intermediate $\tau$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.