Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Extended Isolation Forest

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1811.02141 v3 pith:M6BXK6Y2 submitted 2018-11-06 cs.LG astro-ph.IMstat.ML

classification cs.LGastro-ph.IMstat.ML
keywords anomalydataforestisolationmapsalgorithmalongdatasets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present an extension to the model-free anomaly detection algorithm, Isolation Forest. This extension, named Extended Isolation Forest (EIF), resolves issues with assignment of anomaly score to given data points. We motivate the problem using heat maps for anomaly scores. These maps suffer from artifacts generated by the criteria for branching operation of the binary tree. We explain this problem in detail and demonstrate the mechanism by which it occurs visually. We then propose two different approaches for improving the situation. First we propose transforming the data randomly before creation of each tree, which results in averaging out the bias. Second, which is the preferred way, is to allow the slicing of the data to use hyperplanes with random slopes. This approach results in remedying the artifact seen in the anomaly score heat maps. We show that the robustness of the algorithm is much improved using this method by looking at the variance of scores of data points distributed along constant level sets. We report AUROC and AUPRC for our synthetic datasets, along with real-world benchmark datasets. We find no appreciable difference in the rate of convergence nor in computation time between the standard Isolation Forest and EIF.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PIF: Anomaly detection via preference embedding

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PIF embeds points as preference vectors over random parametric models and isolates anomalies with a Voronoi-based isolation forest using the Tanimoto distance, outperforming LOF, IFOR, and EIFOR in the tested settings.

  2. We Need to Rethink Benchmarking in Anomaly Detection

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Evaluating anomaly detection by averaging over diverse datasets is misleading; the paper proposes scenario-based benchmarking organized by shared structural properties.

  3. siForest: Detecting Network Anomalies with Set-Structured Isolation Forest

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A set-partitioned Isolation Forest variant detects synthetic network scan anomalies at IP level, with best results on unusual port-service pairings but modest precision on volume spikes.

  4. An empirical comparison of some outlier detection methods with longitudinal data

    stat.ME 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    An empirical comparison of seven outlier detection methods on four panel datasets shows high rank agreement among scores, especially between isolation forest and the Hidiroglou-Berthelot score, but no external ground ...

Pith tools