Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Quantifying Uncertainties in Natural Language Processing Tasks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1811.07253 v1 pith:MR7FNXSK submitted 2018-11-18 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LGcs.NE

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LGcs.NE
keywords languagetasksuncertaintiesmodelmodelingnaturalprocessingquantification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Reliable uncertainty quantification is a first step towards building explainable, transparent, and accountable artificial intelligent systems. Recent progress in Bayesian deep learning has made such quantification realizable. In this paper, we propose novel methods to study the benefits of characterizing model and data uncertainties for natural language processing (NLP) tasks. With empirical experiments on sentiment analysis, named entity recognition, and language modeling using convolutional and recurrent neural network models, we show that explicitly modeling uncertainties is not only necessary to measure output confidence levels, but also useful at enhancing model performances in various NLP tasks.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Grammars of Formal Uncertainty: When to Trust LLMs in Automated Reasoning Tasks

    cs.CL 2025-05 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A grammar-based model of LLM-generated SMT-LIB code produces uncertainty signals that predict formalization errors on some reasoning tasks, with fused signals giving large error reductions only in an in-sample evaluation.

Pith tools