REVIEW 2 cited by
A Survey of Fake News: Fundamental Theories, Detection Methods, and Opportunities
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The explosive growth in fake news and its erosion to democracy, justice, and public trust has increased the demand for fake news detection and intervention. This survey reviews and evaluates methods that can detect fake news from four perspectives: (1) the false knowledge it carries, (2) its writing style, (3) its propagation patterns, and (4) the credibility of its source. The survey also highlights some potential research tasks based on the review. In particular, we identify and detail related fundamental theories across various disciplines to encourage interdisciplinary research on fake news. We hope this survey can facilitate collaborative efforts among experts in computer and information sciences, social sciences, political science, and journalism to research fake news, where such efforts can lead to fake news detection that is not only efficient but more importantly, explainable.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Stop using Media Bias/Fact Check in research
Media Bias/Fact Check fails academic rigor standards and should not be used in research because it presents political outcomes as neutral facts about media quality.
-
Towards Automated Fact-Checking of Real-World Claims: Exploring Task Formulation and Assessment with LLMs
In a benchmark of 17,856 PolitiFact claims, larger Llama-3 models and retrieved web evidence improve automated fact-checking accuracy and justification quality, though fine-grained labels remain difficult.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.