REVIEW 1 cited by
Auto-tuning TensorFlow Threading Model for CPU Backend
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
TensorFlow is a popular deep learning framework used by data scientists to solve a wide-range of machine learning and deep learning problems such as image classification and speech recognition. It also operates at a large scale and in heterogeneous environments --- it allows users to train neural network models or deploy them for inference using GPUs, CPUs and deep learning specific custom-designed hardware such as TPUs. Even though TensorFlow supports a variety of optimized backends, realizing the best performance using a backend may require additional efforts. For instance, getting the best performance from a CPU backend requires careful tuning of its threading model. Unfortunately, the best tuning approach used today is manual, tedious, time-consuming, and, more importantly, may not guarantee the best performance. In this paper, we develop an automatic approach, called TensorTuner, to search for optimal parameter settings of TensorFlow's threading model for CPU backends. We evaluate TensorTuner on both Eigen and Intel's MKL CPU backends using a set of neural networks from TensorFlow's benchmarking suite. Our evaluation results demonstrate that the parameter settings found by TensorTuner produce 2% to 123% performance improvement for the Eigen CPU backend and 1.5% to 28% performance improvement for the MKL CPU backend over the performance obtained using their best-known parameter settings. This highlights the fact that the default parameter settings in Eigen CPU backend are not the ideal settings; and even for a carefully hand-tuned MKL backend, the settings may be sub-optimal. Our evaluations also revealed that TensorTuner is efficient at finding the optimal settings --- it is able to converge to the optimal settings quickly by pruning more than 90% of the parameter search space.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Exploiting Parallelism Opportunities with Deep Learning Frameworks
A graph-width-based rule for setting TensorFlow's inter-op and intra-op thread pools achieves 1.29x to 1.34x speedups over vendor-recommended settings on Intel CPUs.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.