Pith.

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · arXiv:1812.02548 v2 · submitted 6 Dec 2018

Collinearly improved kernel suppresses Coulomb tails in the impact-parameter dependent Balitsky-Kovchegov evolution

J. Cepila, J. G. Contreras, M. Matas

The paper says

“We find that the solutions do not present the Coulomb tails that have affected previous studies.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

We solved the impact-parameter dependent Balitsky-Kovchegov equation with the recently proposed collinearly imporved kernel. We find that the solutions do not present the Coulomb tails that have affected previous studies. We also show that once choosing an adequate initial condition it is possible to obtain a reasonable description of HERA data on the structure function of the proton, as well as on the cross section for the exclusive production of a J/ψ vector meson off proton targets. As a further application of the solutions, we computed the impact-parameter dependent Weiszäcker-Williams gluon distribution.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: asserted 1.00

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.22 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.12 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.08 · compares with prior results 0.90 · mentions code or data availability 0.02

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v2). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
We solved the impact-parameter dependent Balitsky-Kovchegov equation with the recently proposed collinearly imporved kernel. contribution 0.59 0.96 0.07 asserted 1.00
We find that the solutions do not present the Coulomb tails that have affected previous studies. result 1.00 0.96 0.72 asserted 1.00
We also show that once choosing an adequate initial condition it is possible to obtain a reasonable description of HERA data on the structure function of the proton, as well as on the cross section for the exclusive production of a $\mathrm{J/}\psi$ vector meson off proton targets. result 0.97 0.94 0.20 hedged possibility 0.50
As a further application of the solutions, we computed the impact-parameter dependent Weisz\"acker-Williams gluon distribution. contribution 0.66 0.96 0.06 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 0.86 · evidence from simulation or computation 1.00

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v2

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,634 input tokens.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Cited by 4 Pith papers
How the literature uses it

19 arXiv papers cite this in 41 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 26 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 1 paper
Uses its method or tool 3 papers
Compares with it 2 papers
Cites it as support 2 papers
Cites it as background 4 papers

What it cites · 29 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 9 papers
Uses data or values from 1 paper
Cites as background 26 papers

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment