Pith. Sign in

RECORD

High-Fidelity Vector Space Models of Structured Data

Artificial Intelligence · Submitted 9 Jan 2019

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The method is demonstrated in two areas, automated reasoning and natural language processing, where it is shown to produce vector representations of natural-language sentences and first-order logic clauses that can be precisely translated back to their original, structured input forms.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1901.02565 (version 2)
Pith ID6GQYOMRD, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAchille Fokoue, Constantine Nakos, Kenneth Forbus, Lingfei Wu, Maria Chang, Maxwell Crouse, Michael Witbrock, Pavan Kapanipathi, Ryan Musa. "High-Fidelity Vector Space Models of Structured Data." arXiv:1901.02565 (2019). https://pith.science/paper/6GQYOMRD
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,341 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.14 · states limitation 0.18 · human participants 0.03 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.06 · compares with prior results 0.07 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Machine learning systems regularly deal with structured data in real-world applications. Unfortunately, such data has been difficult to faithfully represent in a way that most machine learning techniques would expect, i.e. as a real-valued vector of a fixed, pre-specified size. In this work, we introduce a novel approach that compiles structured data into a satisfiability problem which has in its set of solutions at least (and often only) the input data. The satisfiability problem is constructed from constraints which are generated automatically a priori from a given signature, thus trivially allowing for a bag-of-words-esque vector representation of the input to be constructed. The method is demonstrated in two areas, automated reasoning and natural language processing, where it is shown to produce vector representations of natural-language sentences and first-order logic clauses that can be precisely translated back to their original, structured input forms.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Machine learning systems regularly deal with structured data in real-world applications. background 1.00 0.05 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 Unfortunately, such data has been difficult to faithfully represent in a way that most machine learning techniques would expect, i.e. as a real-valued vector of a fixed, pre-specified size. gap 0.59 0.06 0.03 asserted 1.00
s2 In this work, we introduce a novel approach that compiles structured data into a satisfiability problem which has in its set of solutions at least (and often only) the input data. contribution 0.91 0.94 0.28 asserted 0.99
s3 The satisfiability problem is constructed from constraints which are generated automatically a priori from a given signature, thus trivially allowing for a bag-of-words-esque vector representation of the input to be constructed. method 1.00 0.82 0.09 asserted 0.98
s4 The method is demonstrated in two areas, automated reasoning and natural language processing, where it is shown to produce vector representations of natural-language sentences and first-order logic clauses that can be precisely translated back to their original, structured input forms. result 0.98 0.95 0.64 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.48.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Machine learning systems regularly deal with structured data in real-world applications. Unfortunately, such data has been difficult to faithfully represent in a way that most machine learning techniques would expect, i.e. as a real-valued vector of a fixed, pre-specified size. In this work, we introduce a novel approach that compiles structured data into a satisfiability problem which has in its set of solutions at least (and often only) the input data. The satisfiability problem is constructed from constraints which are generated automatically a priori from a given signature, thus trivially allowing for a bag-of-words-esque vector representation of the input to be constructed. The method is demonstrated in two areas, automated reasoning and natural language processing, where it is shown to produce vector representations of natural-language sentences and first-order logic clauses that can be precisely translated back to their original, structured input forms.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 1 sentence without a confident label

Cites as background 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.