REVIEW 2 cited by
Still out there: Modeling and Identifying Russian Troll Accounts on Twitter
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
There is evidence that Russia's Internet Research Agency attempted to interfere with the 2016 U.S. election by running fake accounts on Twitter - often referred to as "Russian trolls". In this work, we: 1) develop machine learning models that predict whether a Twitter account is a Russian troll within a set of 170K control accounts; and, 2) demonstrate that it is possible to use this model to find active accounts on Twitter still likely acting on behalf of the Russian state. Using both behavioral and linguistic features, we show that it is possible to distinguish between a troll and a non-troll with a precision of 78.5% and an AUC of 98.9%, under cross-validation. Applying the model to out-of-sample accounts still active today, we find that up to 2.6% of top journalists' mentions are occupied by Russian trolls. These findings imply that the Russian trolls are very likely still active today. Additional analysis shows that they are not merely software-controlled bots, and manage their online identities in various complex ways. Finally, we argue that if it is possible to discover these accounts using externally - accessible data, then the platforms - with access to a variety of private internal signals - should succeed at similar or better rates.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Towards Ethical Content-Based Detection of Online Influence Campaigns
A BERT classifier detects Russian influence-account comments on Reddit but produces higher false positive rates on English text by native Russian speakers; named entity masking narrows the gap.
-
Noncooperative dynamics in election interference
A stochastic differential game predicts that all-or-nothing election stakes escalate interference spending by both sides, and a fitted application to 2016 U.S. data matches the middle of the campaign but not its start.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.