Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Towards a Robust Deep Neural Network in Texts: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1902.07285 v6 pith:PJQD3JB4 submitted 2019-02-12 cs.CL cs.CRcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.CRcs.LG
keywords adversarialtextstechniquestextdnn-basedexistingrobuststudies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep neural networks (DNNs) have achieved remarkable success in various tasks (e.g., image classification, speech recognition, and natural language processing (NLP)). However, researchers have demonstrated that DNN-based models are vulnerable to adversarial examples, which cause erroneous predictions by adding imperceptible perturbations into legitimate inputs. Recently, studies have revealed adversarial examples in the text domain, which could effectively evade various DNN-based text analyzers and further bring the threats of the proliferation of disinformation. In this paper, we give a comprehensive survey on the existing studies of adversarial techniques for generating adversarial texts written by both English and Chinese characters and the corresponding defense methods. More importantly, we hope that our work could inspire future studies to develop more robust DNN-based text analyzers against known and unknown adversarial techniques. We classify the existing adversarial techniques for crafting adversarial texts based on the perturbation units, helping to better understand the generation of adversarial texts and build robust models for defense. In presenting the taxonomy of adversarial attacks and defenses in the text domain, we introduce the adversarial techniques from the perspective of different NLP tasks. Finally, we discuss the existing challenges of adversarial attacks and defenses in texts and present the future research directions in this emerging and challenging field.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. TrustGLM: Evaluating the Robustness of GraphLLMs Against Prompt, Text, and Structure Attacks

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    GraphLLMs are broadly vulnerable to text, graph structure, and prompt label attacks, but the severity depends heavily on the model and dataset.

  2. Coordinated Robustness Evaluation Framework for Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A coordinated image-plus-text attack built on a surrogate multimodal encoder achieves 80-94% attack success against ViLT, BLIP, and GIT on VQA and visual reasoning, surpassing cited baselines.

Pith tools