Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Lower bounds on the non-Clifford resources for quantum computations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1904.01124 v2 pith:X5IAF4ON submitted 2019-04-01 quant-ph

Lower bounds on the non-Clifford resources for quantum computations

classification quant-ph
keywords statesstabilizerboundsnumberresourcecomputationsconversionslower
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We establish lower-bounds on the number of resource states, also known as magic states, needed to perform various quantum computing tasks, treating stabilizer operations as free. Our bounds apply to adaptive computations using measurements and an arbitrary number of stabilizer ancillas. We consider (1) resource state conversion, (2) single-qubit unitary synthesis, and (3) computational tasks. To prove our resource conversion bounds we introduce two new monotones, the stabilizer nullity and the dyadic monotone, and make use of the already-known stabilizer extent. We consider conversions that borrow resource states, known as catalyst states, and return them at the end of the algorithm. We show that catalysis is necessary for many conversions and introduce new catalytic conversions, some of which are close to optimal. By finding a canonical form for post-selected stabilizer computations, we show that approximating a single-qubit unitary to within diamond-norm precision $\varepsilon$ requires at least $1/7\cdot\log_2(1/\varepsilon) - 4/3$ $T$-states on average. This is the first lower bound that applies to synthesis protocols using fall-back, mixing techniques, and where the number of ancillas used can depend on $\varepsilon$. Up to multiplicative factors, we optimally lower bound the number of $T$ or $CCZ$ states needed to implement the ubiquitous modular adder and multiply-controlled-$Z$ operations. When the probability of Pauli measurement outcomes is 1/2, some of our bounds become tight to within a small additive constant.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Asymptotic magic state distillation with almost linear rate

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    A new family of magic state distillation protocols based on logical Clifford error checking achieves near-linear asymptotic rate despite overhead exponent exceeding one, showing the quantities are not tightly coupled ...

  2. Magic Gate Teleportation: Structure, Useful Resource States, and Simpler Feedforward

    quant-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    MGT protocols encode the input into a measurement-heralded stabilizer code then apply a logical non-Clifford gate; useful resource states are Clifford-equivalent to diagonal states, and feedforward can often be Pauli.

  3. Unitary Designs from Two Chaotic Hamiltonians and a Random Pauli Operation

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Unitary designs emerge from the temporal ensemble of two chaotic Hamiltonian evolutions separated by a random Pauli operation, based on the universal Pauli spectrum.

  4. Magic state cultivation: growing T states as cheap as CNOT gates

    quant-ph 2024-09 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Magic state cultivation prepares high-fidelity T states with an order of magnitude fewer qubit-rounds than prior distillation methods by gradually growing them within a surface code under depolarizing noise.

  5. Benchmarking a machine-learning differential equations solver on a neutral-atom logical processor

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Logical quantum kernels outperform physical ones when solving differential equations on a neutral-atom processor, with gains traced to noise error detection in the logical encoding.