REVIEW 1 cited by
On the critical end point in a two-flavor linear sigma model coupled to quarks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
We use the linear sigma model coupled to quarks to explore the location of the phase transition lines in the QCD phase diagram from the point of view of chiral symmetry restoration at high temperature and baryon chemical potential. We compute analytically the effective potential in the high- and low-temperature approximations up to sixth order, including the contribution of the ring diagrams to account for the plasma screening properties. We determine the model parameters, namely, the couplings and mass-parameter, from conditions valid at the first order phase transition at vanishing temperature and, using the Hagedorn limiting temperature concept applied to finite baryon density, for a critical baryochemical potential of order of the nucleon mass. We show that when using the set of parameters thus determined, the second order phase transition line (our proxy for the crossover transition) that starts at finite temperature and zero baryon chemical potential converges to the line of first order phase transitions that starts at zero temperature and finite baryon chemical potential to determine the critical end point to lie in the region $5.02<\mu_B^{\mbox{CEP}}/T_c<5.18$, $0.14<T^{\mbox{CEP}}/T_c<0.23$, where $T_c$ is the critical transition temperature at zero baryon chemical potential.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Neutral pion mass in the linear sigma model coupled to quarks at arbitrary magnetic field
In the linear sigma model with quarks, the neutral pion mass first falls and then rises as the external magnetic field grows, a nonmonotonic curve that the earlier weak-field calculation did not show.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.