REVIEW 1 cited by
A type of generalization error induced by initialization in deep neural networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
How initialization and loss function affect the learning of a deep neural network (DNN), specifically its generalization error, is an important problem in practice. In this work, by exploiting the linearity of DNN training dynamics in the NTK regime \citep{jacot2018neural,lee2019wide}, we provide an explicit and quantitative answer to this problem. Focusing on regression problem, we prove that, in the NTK regime, for any loss in a general class of functions, the DNN finds the same \emph{global} minima---the one that is nearest to the initial value in the parameter space, or equivalently, the one that is closest to the initial DNN output in the corresponding reproducing kernel Hilbert space. Using these optimization problems, we quantify the impact of initial output and prove that a random non-zero one increases the generalization error. We further propose an antisymmetrical initialization (ASI) trick that eliminates this type of error and accelerates the training. To understand whether the above results hold in general, we also perform experiments for DNNs in the non-NTK regime, which demonstrate the effectiveness of our theoretical results and the ASI trick in a qualitative sense. Overall, our work serves as a baseline for the further investigation of the impact of initialization and loss function on the generalization of DNNs, which can potentially guide and improve the training of DNNs in practice.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Scalable Complexity Control Facilitates Reasoning Ability of LLMs
Controlling model complexity through smaller initialization rates and stronger weight decay improved LLM benchmark scores and made loss-versus-scale curves descend faster.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.