Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Learning to Reason in Large Theories without Imitation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.10501 v3 pith:KKYKWNG2 submitted 2019-05-25 cs.LG cs.AIcs.LOstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.LOstat.ML
keywords learningexplorationpremisestheoremtrainedexperimentshumanimitation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we demonstrate how to do automated theorem proving in the presence of a large knowledge base of potential premises without learning from human proofs. We suggest an exploration mechanism that mixes in additional premises selected by a tf-idf (term frequency-inverse document frequency) based lookup in a deep reinforcement learning scenario. This helps with exploring and learning which premises are relevant for proving a new theorem. Our experiments show that the theorem prover trained with this exploration mechanism outperforms provers that are trained only on human proofs. It approaches the performance of a prover trained by a combination of imitation and reinforcement learning. We perform multiple experiments to understand the importance of the underlying assumptions that make our exploration approach work, thus explaining our design choices.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Planning to Hammer: Difficulty-Aware Decomposition for Automating Rocq Proofs

    cs.SE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Quarry splits Rocq proof automation into LLM-proposed decompositions and CoqHammer execution, ranking candidates by learned difficulty, improving success by 7–13 points.

  2. Rango: Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Proving for Automated Software Verification

    cs.SE 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Rango proves 32.0% of Coq theorems in a large benchmark by retrieving relevant in-project proofs and lemmas at each step, outperforming prior proof synthesis tools.

  3. Solving Formal Math Problems by Decomposition and Iterative Reflection

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An agent that decomposes Lean 4 goals into subproblems and iteratively repairs proofs achieves a 95.9% pass rate on miniF2F-test using a stock Gemini model.

Pith tools