Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Combating Adversarial Misspellings with Robust Word Recognition

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.11268 v2 pith:CYZNCV2P submitted 2019-05-27 cs.CL cs.CRcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.CRcs.LG
keywords recognitionwordadversarialmodelrobustnessaccuracyanalysisclassifier
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

To combat adversarial spelling mistakes, we propose placing a word recognition model in front of the downstream classifier. Our word recognition models build upon the RNN semi-character architecture, introducing several new backoff strategies for handling rare and unseen words. Trained to recognize words corrupted by random adds, drops, swaps, and keyboard mistakes, our method achieves 32% relative (and 3.3% absolute) error reduction over the vanilla semi-character model. Notably, our pipeline confers robustness on the downstream classifier, outperforming both adversarial training and off-the-shelf spell checkers. Against a BERT model fine-tuned for sentiment analysis, a single adversarially-chosen character attack lowers accuracy from 90.3% to 45.8%. Our defense restores accuracy to 75%. Surprisingly, better word recognition does not always entail greater robustness. Our analysis reveals that robustness also depends upon a quantity that we denote the sensitivity.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Are Language Models Agnostic to Linguistically Grounded Perturbations? A Case Study of Indic Languages

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Pre-trained language models are vulnerable to phonologically and orthographically motivated character substitutions in Indic languages, but less so than to unconstrained random character substitution.

  2. On the Validity of Traditional Vulnerability Scoring Systems for Adversarial Attacks against LLMs

    cs.CR 2024-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Applying CVSS, DREAD, OWASP, and SSVC to 56 adversarial LLM attacks via three LLM judges yields near-constant factor scores, which the authors take as evidence that these metrics cannot differentiate LLM attacks.

Pith tools