pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.11862 · v1 · pith:34EMCKE2new · submitted 2019-06-27 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-th

A numerical evaluation of planar two-loop helicity amplitudes for a W-boson plus four partons

Heribertus Bayu Hartanto , Simon Badger , Christian Br{\o}nnum-Hansen , Tiziano Peraro This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 14:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-th
keywords two-loop amplitudeshelicity amplitudesW bosonQCDmaster integralsnumerical evaluationfinite fieldssector decomposition
0
0 comments X

The pith

The first numerical results for two-loop helicity amplitudes of a W boson plus four partons are obtained in QCD.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper computes the first numerical values for two-loop helicity amplitudes in the scattering of a W boson with four partons. Finite field sampling reduces Feynman diagrams directly to coefficients of master integrals after integration-by-parts identities are applied. Since a complete analytic basis of master integrals is unavailable, the authors identify a workable subset with simple divergence structure through local numerator insertions and evaluate it numerically via sector decomposition. The resulting amplitudes supply concrete numbers that can feed into higher-order predictions for relevant collider processes.

Core claim

We present the first numerical results for the two-loop helicity amplitudes for the scattering of four partons and a W-boson in QCD. We use a finite field sampling method to reduce directly from Feynman diagrams to the coefficients of a set of master integrals after applying integration-by-parts identities. Since the basis of master integrals is not yet fully known analytically, we identify a set of master integrals with a simple divergence structure using local numerator insertions. This allows for accurate numerical evaluation of the amplitude using sector decomposition methods.

What carries the argument

Finite field sampling for direct reduction of diagrams to master-integral coefficients, followed by selection of a subset of master integrals with simple divergence structure via local numerator insertions.

If this is right

  • The numerical amplitudes enable next-to-next-to-leading-order QCD predictions for W-boson production with jets.
  • The method demonstrates how to obtain usable results for multi-leg two-loop processes even when the full analytic master-integral basis remains unknown.
  • Planar contributions to these amplitudes are now available in numerical form for phenomenological use.
  • The approach reconstructs the complete amplitude from a carefully chosen subset of integrals.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar finite-field and sector-decomposition techniques could be applied to other two-loop processes where analytic integration lags.
  • The work highlights the value of developing complete analytic bases for master integrals in related kinematic regions.
  • Inclusion of non-planar diagrams would be required to reach fully general results for the process.

Load-bearing premise

A suitable subset of master integrals with simple divergence structure can be identified via local numerator insertions so that the full amplitude is accurately reconstructed from their numerical values.

What would settle it

An independent numerical or analytic calculation of the same two-loop amplitudes that produces results differing beyond numerical uncertainty would show the selected subset or reconstruction procedure is insufficient.

read the original abstract

We present the first numerical results for the two-loop helicity amplitudes for the scattering of four partons and a W-boson in QCD. We use a finite field sampling method to reduce directly from Feynman diagrams to the coefficients of a set of master integrals after applying integration-by-parts identities. Since the basis of master integrals is not yet fully known analytically, we identify a set of master integrals with a simple divergence structure using local numerator insertions. This allows for accurate numerical evaluation of the amplitude using sector decomposition methods.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper presents the first numerical results for the planar two-loop helicity amplitudes for W-boson plus four partons in QCD. It applies finite-field sampling to reduce Feynman diagrams directly to master-integral coefficients after IBP reduction. Because the full analytic master-integral basis is unavailable, a subset of integrals with simple divergence structure is identified via local numerator insertions and evaluated numerically with sector decomposition to assemble the amplitudes.

Significance. If the results hold, the work supplies the first numerical helicity amplitudes for this process, which is relevant for precision phenomenology in W + jets production. The finite-field reduction combined with numerical sector-decomposition evaluation of a locally selected master-integral subset demonstrates a viable route for amplitudes lacking complete analytic bases. The local-numerator technique for controlling divergences is a concrete technical contribution that could be applied more broadly.

major comments (1)
  1. [section describing master-integral selection and amplitude reconstruction] The central claim that the reported numerical helicity amplitudes are complete rests on the selected subset of master integrals (identified by local numerator insertions to ensure simple divergences) spanning every term required by the full IBP-reduced expression. No independent cross-check—such as explicit verification of infrared-pole cancellation against known counterterms, analytic continuation tests, or comparison to a process whose complete master-integral basis is known—is described. This assumption is load-bearing for the assertion that the numerical results represent the full amplitudes.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [section describing master-integral selection and amplitude reconstruction] The central claim that the reported numerical helicity amplitudes are complete rests on the selected subset of master integrals (identified by local numerator insertions to ensure simple divergences) spanning every term required by the full IBP-reduced expression. No independent cross-check—such as explicit verification of infrared-pole cancellation against known counterterms, analytic continuation tests, or comparison to a process whose complete master-integral basis is known—is described. This assumption is load-bearing for the assertion that the numerical results represent the full amplitudes.

    Authors: The finite-field sampling is performed on the complete set of Feynman diagrams after full IBP reduction, yielding exact rational coefficients for every master integral appearing in the reduction. The local numerator insertions are introduced solely to simplify the ultraviolet and infrared divergence structure of those integrals, enabling stable sector-decomposition evaluation; they do not truncate the basis. Consequently, the numerically evaluated subset, multiplied by the computed coefficients, reconstructs the full amplitude by construction of the reduction. We acknowledge that the original manuscript does not present an explicit cross-check and will add, in the revised version, a verification that the leading infrared poles match the known universal counterterms for this process. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained computational pipeline

full rationale

The paper's chain proceeds from Feynman diagrams through standard IBP reduction (via finite-field sampling) to extraction of coefficients for a chosen subset of master integrals, followed by sector-decomposition numerics. The subset is selected by the methodological criterion of simple divergence structure via local numerator insertions; this is an explicit engineering choice, not a self-definition that makes the amplitude tautological. No parameter is fitted to data and then relabeled as a prediction, no load-bearing uniqueness theorem is imported from self-citation, and no ansatz is smuggled. The result is therefore independent of its own outputs and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach rests on standard multi-loop techniques whose validity is assumed rather than re-derived; no new free parameters, ad-hoc entities, or fitted constants are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Integration-by-parts identities can reduce all Feynman integrals appearing in the amplitude to a linear combination of master integrals.
    Invoked when the finite-field sampling is applied after IBP reduction.
  • domain assumption Sector decomposition yields numerically stable results for the chosen master integrals with simple divergence structure.
    Required for the final numerical evaluation step.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5625 in / 1403 out tokens · 33620 ms · 2026-05-25T14:31:11.062113+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 94 canonical work pages · 82 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    J. R. Andersen et al.,Les Houches 2015: Physics at TeV Colliders Standard Model Working Group Report, in9th Les Houches Workshop on Physics at TeV Colliders (PhysTeV 2015) Les Houches, France, June 1-19, 2015, 2016. 1605.04692

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  2. [2]

    Les Houches 2017: Physics at TeV Colliders Standard Model Working Group Report, 2018

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    A novel approach to integration by parts reduction

    A. von Manteuffel and R. M. Schabinger,A novel approach to integration by parts reduction, Phys. Lett. B744 (2015) 101–104, [1406.4513]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  4. [4]

    Scattering amplitudes over finite fields and multivariate functional reconstruction

    T. Peraro,Scattering amplitudes over finite fields and multivariate functional reconstruction, JHEP 12 (2016) 030, [1608.01902]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    FiniteFlow: multivariate functional reconstruction using finite fields and dataflow graphs

    T. Peraro,FiniteFlow: multivariate functional reconstruction using finite fields and dataflow graphs, 1905.08019

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1905

  6. [6]

    C. G. Papadopoulos, D. Tommasini and C. Wever,The Pentabox Master Integrals with the Simplified Differential Equations approach, JHEP 04 (2016) 078, [1511.09404]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    Pentagon functions for massless planar scattering amplitudes

    T. Gehrmann, J. M. Henn and N. A. Lo Presti,Pentagon functions for massless planar scattering amplitudes, JHEP 10 (2018) 103, [1807.09812]. – 18 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    Analytic form of the two-loop planar five-gluon all-plus-helicity amplitude in QCD

    T. Gehrmann, J. M. Henn and N. A. Lo Presti,Analytic form of the two-loop planar five-gluon all-plus-helicity amplitude in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.116 (2016) 062001, [1511.05409]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  9. [9]

    Analytic helicity amplitudes for two-loop five-gluon scattering: the single-minus case

    S. Badger, C. Brønnum-Hansen, H. B. Hartanto and T. Peraro,Analytic helicity amplitudes for two-loop five-gluon scattering: the single-minus case, JHEP 01 (2019) 186, [1811.11699]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  10. [10]

    Analytic Form of the Planar Two-Loop Five-Gluon Scattering Amplitudes in QCD

    S. Abreu, J. Dormans, F. Febres Cordero, H. Ita and B. Page,Analytic Form of the Planar Two-Loop Five-Gluon Scattering Amplitudes in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.122 (2019) 082002, [1812.04586]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  11. [11]

    Analytic Form of the Planar Two-Loop Five-Parton Scattering Amplitudes in QCD

    S. Abreu, J. Dormans, F. Febres Cordero, H. Ita, B. Page and V. Sotnikov,Analytic Form of the Planar Two-Loop Five-Parton Scattering Amplitudes in QCD, JHEP 05 (2019) 084, [1904.00945]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  12. [12]

    W. T. Giele, E. W. N. Glover and D. A. Kosower,Higher order corrections to jet cross-sections in hadron colliders, Nucl. Phys. B403 (1993) 633–670, [hep-ph/9302225]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  13. [13]

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, D. C. Dunbar and D. A. Kosower,One loop n point gauge theory amplitudes, unitarity and collinear limits, Nucl. Phys. B425 (1994) 217–260, [hep-ph/9403226]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  14. [14]

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, D. C. Dunbar and D. A. Kosower,Fusing gauge theory tree amplitudes into loop amplitudes, Nucl. Phys. B435 (1995) 59–101, [hep-ph/9409265]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  15. [15]

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, D. A. Kosower and S. Weinzierl,One loop amplitudes for e+ e- —> anti-q q anti-Q Q, Nucl. Phys. B489 (1997) 3–23, [hep-ph/9610370]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  16. [16]

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon and D. A. Kosower,One loop amplitudes for e+ e- to four partons, Nucl. Phys. B513 (1998) 3–86, [hep-ph/9708239]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  17. [17]

    J. M. Campbell and R. K. Ellis,Next-to-leading order corrections toW + 2 jet andZ + 2 jet production at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D65 (2002) 113007, [hep-ph/0202176]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  18. [18]

    R. K. Ellis, W. T. Giele, Z. Kunszt, K. Melnikov and G. Zanderighi,One-loop amplitudes for W + 3 jet production in hadron collisions, JHEP 01 (2009) 012, [0810.2762]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  19. [19]

    R. K. Ellis, K. Melnikov and G. Zanderighi,Generalized unitarity at work: first NLO QCD results for hadronicW + 3jet production, JHEP 04 (2009) 077, [0901.4101]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  20. [20]

    C. F. Berger, Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, F. Febres Cordero, D. Forde, H. Ita et al.,An Automated Implementation of On-Shell Methods for One-Loop Amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 036003, [0803.4180]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  21. [21]

    C. F. Berger, Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, F. Febres Cordero, D. Forde, T. Gleisberg et al., Next-to-Leading Order QCD Predictions for W+3-Jet Distributions at Hadron Colliders, Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 074036, [0907.1984]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  22. [22]

    C. F. Berger, Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, F. Febres Cordero, D. Forde, T. Gleisberg et al.,Precise Predictions for W + 4 Jet Production at the Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. Lett.106 (2011) 092001, [1009.2338]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  23. [23]

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, F. Febres Cordero, S. Höche, H. Ita, D. A. Kosower et al., Next-to-Leading OrderW + 5-Jet Production at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 014025, [1304.1253]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  24. [24]

    F. V. Tkachov,A Theorem on Analytical Calculability of Four Loop Renormalization Group Functions, Phys. Lett. 100B (1981) 65–68. – 19 –

    work page 1981

  25. [25]

    K. G. Chetyrkin and F. V. Tkachov,Integration by Parts: The Algorithm to Calculate beta Functions in 4 Loops, Nucl. Phys. B192 (1981) 159–204

    work page 1981

  26. [26]

    High-precision calculation of multi-loop Feynman integrals by difference equations

    S. Laporta,High precision calculation of multiloop Feynman integrals by difference equations, Int. J. Mod. Phys.A15 (2000) 5087–5159, [hep-ph/0102033]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  27. [27]

    A. V. Kotikov,Differential equations method: New technique for massive Feynman diagrams calculation, Phys. Lett. B254 (1991) 158–164

    work page 1991

  28. [28]

    Differential Equations for Two-Loop Four-Point Functions

    T. Gehrmann and E. Remiddi,Differential equations for two loop four point functions, Nucl. Phys. B580 (2000) 485–518, [hep-ph/9912329]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  29. [29]

    J. M. Henn,Multiloop integrals in dimensional regularization made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 251601, [1304.1806]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  30. [30]

    Differential equations from unitarity cuts: nonplanar hexa-box integrals

    S. Abreu, B. Page and M. Zeng,Differential equations from unitarity cuts: nonplanar hexa-box integrals, JHEP 01 (2019) 006, [1807.11522]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  31. [31]

    J. Böhm, A. Georgoudis, K. J. Larsen, H. Schönemann and Y. Zhang,Complete integration-by-parts reductions of the non-planar hexagon-box via module intersections, JHEP 09 (2018) 024, [1805.01873]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  32. [32]

    The two-loop five-point amplitude in $\mathcal{N} =4$ super-Yang-Mills theory

    S. Abreu, L. J. Dixon, E. Herrmann, B. Page and M. Zeng,The two-loop five-point amplitude inN = 4 super-Yang-Mills theory, 1812.08941

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    Analytic result for the nonplanar hexa-box integrals

    D. Chicherin, T. Gehrmann, J. M. Henn, N. A. Lo Presti, V. Mitev and P. Wasser,Analytic result for the nonplanar hexa-box integrals, JHEP 03 (2019) 042, [1809.06240]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  34. [34]

    Chicherin, T

    D. Chicherin, T. Gehrmann, J. M. Henn, P. Wasser, Y. Zhang and S. Zoia,All master integrals for three-jet production at NNLO, 1812.11160

    work page arXiv

  35. [35]

    Towards a Basis for Planar Two-Loop Integrals

    J. Gluza, K. Kajda and D. A. Kosower,Towards a Basis for Planar Two-Loop Integrals, Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 045012, [1009.0472]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  36. [36]

    K. J. Larsen and Y. Zhang,Integration-by-parts reductions from unitarity cuts and algebraic geometry, Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 041701, [1511.01071]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  37. [37]

    Two-loop Integrand Decomposition into Master Integrals and Surface Terms

    H. Ita,Two-loop Integrand Decomposition into Master Integrals and Surface Terms, Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 116015, [1510.05626]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  38. [38]

    D. A. Kosower,Direct Solution of Integration-by-Parts Systems, 1804.00131

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [39]

    R. N. Lee,Presenting LiteRed: a tool for the Loop InTEgrals REDuction, 1212.2685

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    A. V. Smirnov,FIRE5: a C++ implementation of Feynman Integral REduction, Comput. Phys. Commun. 189 (2015) 182–191, [1408.2372]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  41. [41]

    A. V. Smirnov and F. S. Chuharev,FIRE6: Feynman Integral REduction with Modular Arithmetic, 1901.07808

    work page arXiv 1901

  42. [42]

    Reduze 2 - Distributed Feynman Integral Reduction

    A. von Manteuffel and C. Studerus,Reduze 2 - Distributed Feynman Integral Reduction, 1201.4330

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [43]

    Kira - A Feynman Integral Reduction Program

    P. Maierhöfer, J. Usovitsch and P. Uwer,Kira—A Feynman integral reduction program, Comput. Phys. Commun.230 (2018) 99–112, [1705.05610]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  44. [44]

    R. H. Boels, Q. Jin and H. Luo,Efficient integrand reduction for particles with spin, 1802.06761

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    H. A. Chawdhry, M. A. Lim and A. Mitov,Two-loop five-point massless QCD amplitudes within the IBP approach, 1805.09182. – 20 –

    work page arXiv

  46. [46]

    Reducing full one-loop amplitudes to scalar integrals at the integrand level

    G. Ossola, C. G. Papadopoulos and R. Pittau,Reducing full one-loop amplitudes to scalar integrals at the integrand level, Nucl. Phys. B763 (2007) 147–169, [hep-ph/0609007]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  47. [47]

    On the Integrand-Reduction Method for Two-Loop Scattering Amplitudes

    P. Mastrolia and G. Ossola,On the Integrand-Reduction Method for Two-Loop Scattering Amplitudes, JHEP 11 (2011) 014, [1107.6041]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  48. [48]

    Scattering Amplitudes from Multivariate Polynomial Division

    P. Mastrolia, E. Mirabella, G. Ossola and T. Peraro,Scattering Amplitudes from Multivariate Polynomial Division, Phys. Lett. B718 (2012) 173–177, [1205.7087]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  49. [49]

    Integrand-Level Reduction of Loop Amplitudes by Computational Algebraic Geometry Methods

    Y. Zhang,Integrand-Level Reduction of Loop Amplitudes by Computational Algebraic Geometry Methods, JHEP 09 (2012) 042, [1205.5707]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  50. [50]

    Hepta-Cuts of Two-Loop Scattering Amplitudes

    S. Badger, H. Frellesvig and Y. Zhang,Hepta-Cuts of Two-Loop Scattering Amplitudes, JHEP 04 (2012) 055, [1202.2019]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  51. [51]

    Integrand Reduction for Two-Loop Scattering Amplitudes through Multivariate Polynomial Division

    P. Mastrolia, E. Mirabella, G. Ossola and T. Peraro,Integrand-Reduction for Two-Loop Scattering Amplitudes through Multivariate Polynomial Division, Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 085026, [1209.4319]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  52. [52]

    Multiloop Integrand Reduction for Dimensionally Regulated Amplitudes

    P. Mastrolia, E. Mirabella, G. Ossola and T. Peraro,Multiloop Integrand Reduction for Dimensionally Regulated Amplitudes, Phys. Lett. B727 (2013) 532–535, [1307.5832]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  53. [53]

    Adaptive Integrand Decomposition in parallel and orthogonal space

    P. Mastrolia, T. Peraro and A. Primo,Adaptive Integrand Decomposition in parallel and orthogonal space, JHEP 08 (2016) 164, [1605.03157]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  54. [54]

    D. A. Kosower and K. J. Larsen,Maximal Unitarity at Two Loops, Phys. Rev. D85 (2012) 045017, [1108.1180]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  55. [55]

    Caron-Huot and K

    S. Caron-Huot and K. J. Larsen,Uniqueness of two-loop master contours, JHEP 10 (2012) 026, [1205.0801]

    work page arXiv 2012

  56. [56]

    Two-Loop Four-Gluon Amplitudes with the Numerical Unitarity Method

    S. Abreu, F. Febres Cordero, H. Ita, M. Jaquier, B. Page and M. Zeng,Two-Loop Four-Gluon Amplitudes from Numerical Unitarity, Phys. Rev. Lett.119 (2017) 142001, [1703.05273]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  57. [57]

    Subleading Poles in the Numerical Unitarity Method at Two Loops

    S. Abreu, F. Febres Cordero, H. Ita, M. Jaquier and B. Page,Subleading Poles in the Numerical Unitarity Method at Two Loops, Phys. Rev. D95 (2017) 096011, [1703.05255]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  58. [58]

    A first look at two-loop five-gluon scattering in QCD

    S. Badger, C. Brønnum-Hansen, H. B. Hartanto and T. Peraro,First look at two-loop five-gluon scattering in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.120 (2018) 092001, [1712.02229]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  59. [59]

    Planar Two-Loop Five-Gluon Amplitudes from Numerical Unitarity

    S. Abreu, F. Febres Cordero, H. Ita, B. Page and M. Zeng,Planar Two-Loop Five-Gluon Amplitudes from Numerical Unitarity, Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 116014, [1712.03946]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  60. [60]

    Applications of integrand reduction to two-loop five-point scattering amplitudes in QCD

    S. Badger, C. Brønnum-Hansen, T. Gehrmann, H. B. Hartanto, J. Henn, N. A. Lo Presti et al.,Applications of integrand reduction to two-loop five-point scattering amplitudes in QCD, PoS LL2018 (2018) 006, [1807.09709]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  61. [61]

    Planar Two-Loop Five-Parton Amplitudes from Numerical Unitarity

    S. Abreu, F. Febres Cordero, H. Ita, B. Page and V. Sotnikov,Planar Two-Loop Five-Parton Amplitudes from Numerical Unitarity, JHEP 11 (2018) 116, [1809.09067]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  62. [62]

    Analytic result for a two-loop five-particle amplitude

    D. Chicherin, J. M. Henn, P. Wasser, T. Gehrmann, Y. Zhang and S. Zoia,Analytic result for a two-loop five-particle amplitude, 1812.11057

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  63. [63]

    The two-loop five-point amplitude in $\mathcal N=8$ supergravity

    S. Abreu, L. J. Dixon, E. Herrmann, B. Page and M. Zeng,The two-loop five-point amplitude inN = 8 supergravity, 1901.08563

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1901

  64. [64]

    The two-loop five-particle amplitude in $\mathcal{N}=8$ supergravity

    D. Chicherin, T. Gehrmann, J. M. Henn, P. Wasser, Y. Zhang and S. Zoia,The two-loop five-particle amplitude inN = 8 supergravity, 1901.05932. – 21 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1901

  65. [65]

    Badger, D

    S. Badger, D. Chicherin, T. Gehrmann, G. Heinrich, J. M. Henn, T. Peraro et al.,Analytic form of the full two-loop five-gluon all-plus helicity amplitude, 1905.03733

    work page arXiv 1905

  66. [66]

    An automatized algorithm to compute infrared divergent multi-loop integrals

    T. Binoth and G. Heinrich,An automatized algorithm to compute infrared divergent multiloop integrals, Nucl. Phys. B585 (2000) 741–759, [hep-ph/0004013]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  67. [67]

    A. V. Smirnov,FIESTA4: Optimized Feynman integral calculations with GPU support, Comput. Phys. Commun.204 (2016) 189–199, [1511.03614]

    work page arXiv 2016

  68. [68]

    pySecDec: a toolbox for the numerical evaluation of multi-scale integrals

    S. Borowka, G. Heinrich, S. Jahn, S. P. Jones, M. Kerner, J. Schlenk et al.,pySecDec: a toolbox for the numerical evaluation of multi-scale integrals, 1703.09692

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  69. [69]

    Two-Loop Master Integrals for $\gamma^* \to 3$ Jets: The planar topologies

    T. Gehrmann and E. Remiddi,Two loop master integrals for gamma* —> 3 jets: The Planar topologies, Nucl. Phys. B601 (2001) 248–286, [hep-ph/0008287]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  70. [70]

    The two-loop helicity amplitudes for $q \bar q' \to V_1 V_2 \to 4~\mathrm{leptons}$

    T. Gehrmann, A. von Manteuffel and L. Tancredi,The two-loop helicity amplitudes for qq′→V1V2→ 4 leptons, JHEP 09 (2015) 128, [1503.04812]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  71. [71]

    The two-loop helicity amplitudes for $gg \to V_1 V_2 \to 4~\mathrm{leptons}$

    A. von Manteuffel and L. Tancredi,The two-loop helicity amplitudes for gg→V1V2→ 4 leptons, JHEP 06 (2015) 197, [1503.08835]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  72. [72]

    J. M. Henn, K. Melnikov and V. A. Smirnov,Two-loop planar master integrals for the production of off-shell vector bosons in hadron collisions, JHEP 05 (2014) 090, [1402.7078]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  73. [73]

    Non-planar master integrals for the production of two off-shell vector bosons in collisions of massless partons

    F. Caola, J. M. Henn, K. Melnikov and V. A. Smirnov,Non-planar master integrals for the production of two off-shell vector bosons in collisions of massless partons, JHEP 09 (2014) 043, [1404.5590]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  74. [74]

    The All-Loop Integrand For Scattering Amplitudes in Planar N=4 SYM

    N. Arkani-Hamed, J. L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo, S. Caron-Huot and J. Trnka,The All-Loop Integrand For Scattering Amplitudes in Planar N=4 SYM, JHEP 01 (2011) 041, [1008.2958]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  75. [75]

    Local Integrals for Planar Scattering Amplitudes

    N. Arkani-Hamed, J. L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo and J. Trnka,Local Integrals for Planar Scattering Amplitudes, JHEP 06 (2012) 125, [1012.6032]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  76. [76]

    Nogueira,Automatic Feynman graph generation, J

    P. Nogueira,Automatic Feynman graph generation, J. Comput. Phys.105 (1993) 279–289

    work page 1993

  77. [77]

    ’t Hooft and M

    G. ’t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman,Regularization and Renormalization of Gauge Fields, Nucl. Phys. B44 (1972) 189–213

    work page 1972

  78. [78]

    Z. Bern, A. De Freitas, L. J. Dixon and H. L. Wong,Supersymmetric regularization, two loop QCD amplitudes and coupling shifts, Phys. Rev. D66 (2002) 085002, [hep-ph/0202271]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  79. [79]

    FORM version 4.0

    J. Kuipers, T. Ueda, J. A. M. Vermaseren and J. Vollinga,FORM version 4.0, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 (2013) 1453–1467, [1203.6543]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  80. [80]

    FORM version 4.2

    B. Ruijl, T. Ueda and J. Vermaseren,FORM version 4.2, 1707.06453

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

Showing first 80 references.