pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.00630 · v1 · pith:RG2PLBKBnew · submitted 2019-07-01 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM · astro-ph.HE

A robotic pipeline for fast GRB followup with the Las Cumbres observatory network

R. Martone , C. Guidorzi , C. G. Mundell , S. Kobayashi , A. Cucchiara , A. Gomboc , N. Jordana , T. Laskar
show 4 more authors
M. Marongiu D. C. Morris R. J. Smith I. A. Steele
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 11:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.HE
keywords GRB followuprobotic telescopesLas Cumbres Observatorygamma-ray burstsoptical observationsautomationPython pipelinemulti-messenger astronomy
0
0 comments X

The pith

A Python pipeline submits LCO observation requests for gamma-ray bursts within three minutes of alert receipt.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a software pipeline that automates submission of optical observation requests to the Las Cumbres Observatory network. The code processes incoming socket notices from GRB alerts and issues the requests in under three minutes. This setup supports fully robotic tracking of the earliest phases of GRB optical emission. The authors demonstrate the approach with the event GRB180720B and note that Telegram notifications allow users to intervene if needed. Rapid robotic response matters because early emission from transients encodes key physics that later data cannot recover.

Core claim

The developed pipeline is a Python code designed to promptly submit observation requests to the Las Cumbres Observatory network within 3 minutes of the receipt of the socket notice, allowing fully-robotic tracking of the early phases of the evolution of the optical output from gamma-ray bursts, as shown with the case of GRB180720B. The pipeline also uses Telegram to keep users informed and allow them to take control if needed. This represents a key ingredient for reliable and rapid robotic telescope systems that can be adapted to other facilities.

What carries the argument

The Python pipeline that processes socket notices from GRB alerts and automatically submits observation requests to the LCO network.

If this is right

  • Enables fully-robotic tracking of early GRB optical output without requiring immediate human intervention.
  • Telegram integration allows users to receive updates and assume manual control on demand.
  • The same code structure can be adapted to other robotic telescope networks beyond LCO.
  • Supports rapid response needed for multi-messenger studies of transient early emission.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach could extend to robotic followup of other fast transients such as gravitational-wave counterparts.
  • Running the pipeline on a larger sample of GRBs would test consistency across varying alert conditions and network states.
  • Linking the pipeline to additional alert streams would increase the types of events it can respond to automatically.

Load-bearing premise

The socket notice arrives promptly and the LCO network accepts and executes the request without significant scheduling, weather, or technical delays.

What would settle it

A test case where the pipeline takes longer than three minutes to submit a request after an alert or where early optical data for GRB180720B could not be obtained because of the pipeline timing.

read the original abstract

In the era of multi-messenger astronomy the exploration of the early emission from transients is key for understanding the encoded physics. At the same time, current generation networks of fully-robotic telescopes provide new opportunities in terms of fast followup and sky coverage. This work describes our pipeline designed for robotic optical followup of gamma-ray bursts with the Las Cumbres Observatory network. We designed a Python code to promptly submit observation requests to the Las Cumbres Observatory network within 3 minutes of the receipt of the socket notice. Via Telegram the pipeline keeps the users informed, allowing them to take control upon request. Our group was able to track the early phases of the evolution of the optical output from gamma-ray bursts with a fully-robotic procedure and here we report the case of GRB180720B as an example. The developed pipeline represent a key ingredient for any reliable and rapid (minutes timescale) robotic telescope system. While successfully utilized and adapted for LCO, it can also be adapted to any other robotic facilities.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes a Python pipeline for robotic optical followup of gamma-ray bursts using the Las Cumbres Observatory (LCO) network. It claims to submit observation requests to LCO within 3 minutes of receiving a socket notice, notify users via Telegram, and enable fully-robotic tracking of early GRB optical emission, with GRB180720B presented as a successful demonstration case. The work positions the pipeline as a key component for rapid (minutes-timescale) robotic telescope systems adaptable to other facilities.

Significance. If the 3-minute timing performance and reliability claims are substantiated with data, the pipeline could serve as a practical template for automated GRB followup in multi-messenger astronomy, leveraging existing robotic networks for early-phase observations. As a methods/instrumentation paper, its value lies in operational reproducibility rather than new astrophysical results.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the pipeline 'submits observation requests to the Las Cumbres Observatory network within 3 minutes of the receipt of the socket notice' and enables 'fully-robotic' tracking (demonstrated with GRB180720B) is unsupported by any quantitative evidence. No timestamps, latency measurements, request logs, or timing histograms are provided for GRB180720B or other events, making the performance assertion unverifiable.
  2. [Methods/Implementation (inferred from abstract)] No section provides details on the pipeline's handling of scheduling conflicts, weather downtime, network availability, or failure modes, which are load-bearing for assessing whether the system reliably achieves the claimed rapid robotic response.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: 'The developed pipeline represent a key ingredient' contains a subject-verb agreement error and should read 'represents'.
  2. The manuscript would benefit from a dedicated section or table listing the exact sequence of operations, input formats (e.g., socket notice structure), and output request parameters to improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to provide the requested quantitative support and operational details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the pipeline 'submits observation requests to the Las Cumbres Observatory network within 3 minutes of the receipt of the socket notice' and enables 'fully-robotic' tracking (demonstrated with GRB180720B) is unsupported by any quantitative evidence. No timestamps, latency measurements, request logs, or timing histograms are provided for GRB180720B or other events, making the performance assertion unverifiable.

    Authors: We agree that the performance claims require quantitative substantiation to be verifiable. The manuscript describes the design goal and presents GRB180720B as a demonstration case but does not include supporting timing data. In revision we will add a new subsection (likely under Results) that reports the specific timestamps for GRB180720B from socket notice receipt to observation request submission, along with any available latency measurements or logs. If multi-event statistics exist they will be summarized as well. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods/Implementation (inferred from abstract)] No section provides details on the pipeline's handling of scheduling conflicts, weather downtime, network availability, or failure modes, which are load-bearing for assessing whether the system reliably achieves the claimed rapid robotic response.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes the absence of these operational details. The current text focuses on pipeline architecture and the successful GRB180720B case. We will expand the Implementation/Methods section with a new subsection on operational considerations, describing how the pipeline manages or is affected by scheduling conflicts, weather downtime, network availability, and failure modes based on our LCO experience. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: descriptive software paper with no derivations

full rationale

The manuscript is a software engineering description of a Python pipeline for submitting LCO observation requests. It contains no equations, fitted parameters, uniqueness theorems, or derivation chain. The 3-minute claim is presented as an operational capability demonstrated by GRB180720B usage, not derived from any self-referential inputs or prior self-citations. No steps match any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, mathematical axioms, or invented physical entities; the work relies on existing LCO API, socket alerts, and Telegram service as external infrastructure.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5765 in / 1076 out tokens · 29433 ms · 2026-05-25T11:46:44.736852+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Klebesadel, I.B

    R.W. Klebesadel, I.B. Strong, R.A. Olson, Astrophysical Journal, Letters 182, L85 (1973). DOI 10.1086/181225

    work page doi:10.1086/181225 1973

  2. [2]

    Woosley, Models for Gamma-Ray Burst Progenitors and Central Engines (Gamma-Ray Bursts, Cambridge Astrophysics Series 51, 2012), p

    S.E. Woosley, Models for Gamma-Ray Burst Progenitors and Central Engines (Gamma-Ray Bursts, Cambridge Astrophysics Series 51, 2012), p. 191

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    Lipunov, K.A

    V .M. Lipunov, K.A. Postnov, M.E. Prokhorov, I.E. Panchenko, H.E. Jorgensen, Astrophysical Jour- nal454, 593 (1995). DOI 10.1086/176512

    work page doi:10.1086/176512 1995

  4. [4]

    Abbott, R

    B.P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T.D. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R.X. Adhikari, V .B. Adya, et al., Astrophysical Journal, Letters848, L12 (2017). DOI 10.3847/2041-8213/ aa91c9

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ 2017

  5. [5]

    Eichler, M

    D. Eichler, M. Livio, T. Piran, D.N. Schramm, Nature 340, 126 (1989). DOI 10.1038/340126a0

    work page doi:10.1038/340126a0 1989

  6. [6]

    Paczynski, Acta Astronomica 41, 257 (1991)

    B. Paczynski, Acta Astronomica 41, 257 (1991)

    work page 1991

  7. [7]

    Narayan, B

    R. Narayan, B. Paczynski, T. Piran, ApJ 395, L83 (1992). DOI 10.1086/186493

    work page doi:10.1086/186493 1992

  8. [8]

    van Paradijs, P.J

    J. van Paradijs, P.J. Groot, T. Galama, C. Kouveliotou, R.G. Strom, J. Telting, R.G.M. Rutten, G.J. Fishman, C.A. Meegan, M. Pettini, N. Tanvir, J. Bloom, H. Pedersen, H.U. Nørdgaard-Nielsen, M. Linden-Vørnle, J. Melnick, G. Van der Steene, M. Bremer, R. Naber, J. Heise, J. in’t Zand, E. Costa, M. Feroci, L. Piro, F. Frontera, G. Zavattini, L. Nicastro, E...

    work page doi:10.1038/386686a0 1997

  9. [9]

    Akerlof, R

    C. Akerlof, R. Balsano, S. Barthelmy, J. Bloch, P. Butterworth, D. Casperson, T. Cline, S. Fletcher, F. Frontera, G. Gisler, J. Heise, J. Hills, R. Kehoe, B. Lee, S. Marshall, T. McKay, R. Miller, L. Piro, W. Priedhorsky, J. Szymanski, J. Wren, Nature398(6726), 400 (1999). DOI 10.1038/18837

    work page doi:10.1038/18837 1999

  10. [10]

    Gehrels, G

    N. Gehrels, G. Chincarini, P. Giommi, K.O. Mason, J.A. Nousek, A.A. Wells, N.E. White, S.D. Barthelmy, D.N. Burrows, L.R. Cominsky, K.C. Hurley, F.E. Marshall, P. M´esz´aros, P.W.A. Roming, L. Angelini, L.M. Barbier, T. Belloni, S. Campana, P.A. Caraveo, M.M. Chester, O. Citterio, T.L. Cline, M.S. Cropper, J.R. Cummings, A.J. Dean, E.D. Feigelson, E.E. Fe...

    work page doi:10.1086/422091 2004

  11. [11]

    Akerlof, R.L

    C.W. Akerlof, R.L. Kehoe, T.A. McKay, E.S. Ryko ff, D.A. Smith, D.E. Casperson, K.E. McGowan, W.T. Vestrand, P.R. Wozniak, J.A. Wren, M.C.B. Ashley, M.A. Phillips, S.L. Marshall, H.W. Epps, J.A. Schier, Publications of the ASP115(803), 132 (2003). DOI 10.1086/345490 Pipeline paper 21

    work page doi:10.1086/345490 2003

  12. [12]

    Lipunov, V

    V . Lipunov, V . Kornilov, E. Gorbovskoy, N. Shatskij, D. Kuvshinov, N. Tyurina, A. Belin- ski, A. Krylov, P. Balanutsa, V . Chazov, A. Kuznetsov, P. Kortunov, A. Sankovich, A. Tlatov, A. Parkhomenko, V . Krushinsky, I. Zalozhnyh, A. Popov, T. Kopytova, K. Ivanov, S. Yazev, V . Yurkov, Advances in Astronomy2010, 349171 (2010). DOI 10.1155/2010/349171

    work page doi:10.1155/2010/349171 2010

  13. [13]

    Bo ¨er, M

    M. Bo ¨er, M. Bringer, A. Klotz, A.M. Moly, D. Toublanc, G. Calvet, J. Eysseric, A. Leroy, M. Meis- sonnier, R. Malina, P. Sanchez, C. Pollas, H. Pedersen, Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement138, 579 (1999). DOI 10.1051/aas:1999356

    work page doi:10.1051/aas:1999356 1999

  14. [14]

    Castro-Tirado, J

    A.J. Castro-Tirado, J. Sold ´an, M. Bernas, P. P´ata, T. Rezek, R. Hudec, T.J. Mateo Sanguino, B. de La Morena, J.A. Bern ´a, J. Rodr´ıguez, A. Pe˜na, J. Gorosabel, J.M. M ´as-Hesse, A. Gim ´enez, Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement138, 583 (1999). DOI 10.1051/aas:1999362

    work page doi:10.1051/aas:1999362 1999

  15. [15]

    Steele, R.J

    I.A. Steele, R.J. Smith, P.C. Rees, I.P. Baker, S.D. Bates, M.F. Bode, M.K. Bowman, D. Carter, J. Etherton, M.J. Ford, S.N. Fraser, A. Gomboc, R.D.J. Lett, A.G. Mansfield, J.M. Marchant, G.A. Medrano-Cerda, C.J. Mottram, D. Raback, A.B. Scott, M.D. Tomlinson, R. Zamanov, in Ground- based Telescopes, Proceedings of the SPIE, vol. 5489, ed. by J.M. Oschmann,...

    work page doi:10.1117/12.551456 2004

  16. [16]

    Tsapras, R

    Y . Tsapras, R. Street, K. Horne, C. Snodgrass, M. Dominik, A. Allan, I. Steele, D.M. Bramich, E.S. Saunders, N. Rattenbury, C. Mottram, S. Fraser, N. Clay, M. Burgdorf, M. Bode, T.A. Lister, E. Hawkins, J.P. Beaulieu, P. Fouqu ´e, M. Albrow, J. Menzies, A. Cassan, D. Dominis-Prester, As- tronomische Nachrichten 330, 4 (2009). DOI 10.1002/asna.200811130

    work page doi:10.1002/asna.200811130 2009

  17. [17]

    Lewis, R

    F. Lewis, R. Street, P. Roche, V . Stroud, D.M. Russell, Advances in Astronomy2010, 873059 (2010). DOI 10.1155/2010/873059

    work page doi:10.1155/2010/873059 2010

  18. [18]

    Monfardini, S

    A. Monfardini, S. Kobayashi, C. Guidorzi, D. Carter, C.G. Mundell, D.F. Bersier, A. Gomboc, A. Melandri, C.J. Mottram, R.J. Smith, I.A. Steele, Astrophysical Journal 648, 1125 (2006). DOI 10.1086/506170

    work page doi:10.1086/506170 2006

  19. [19]

    Mundell, A

    C.G. Mundell, A. Melandri, C. Guidorzi, S. Kobayashi, I.A. Steele, D. Malesani, L. Amati, P. D’Avanzo, D.F. Bersier, A. Gomboc, E. Rol, M.F. Bode, D. Carter, C.J. Mottram, A. Monfar- dini, R.J. Smith, S. Malhotra, J. Wang, N. Bannister, P.T. O’Brien, N.R. Tanvir, ApJ660, 489 (2007). DOI 10.1086/512605

    work page doi:10.1086/512605 2007

  20. [20]

    Melandri, C.G

    A. Melandri, C.G. Mundell, S. Kobayashi, C. Guidorzi, A. Gomboc, I.A. Steele, R.J. Smith, D. Bersier, C.J. Mottram, D. Carter, M.F. Bode, P.T. O’Brien, N.R. Tanvir, E. Rol, R. Chapman, ApJ 686, 1209 (2008). DOI 10.1086/591243

    work page doi:10.1086/591243 2008

  21. [21]

    Virgili, C.G

    F.J. Virgili, C.G. Mundell, V . Pal’shin, C. Guidorzi, R. Margutti, A. Melandri, R. Harrison, S. Kobayashi, R. Chornock, A. Henden, A.C. Updike, S.B. Cenko, N.R. Tanvir, I.A. Steele, A. Cuc- chiara, A. Gomboc, A. Levan, Z. Cano, C.J. Mottram, N.R. Clay, D. Bersier, D. Kopaˇc, J. Japelj, A.V . Filippenko, W. Li, D. Svinkin, S. Golenetskii, D.H. Hartmann, P...

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/778/1/54 2013

  22. [22]

    Kopa ˇc, C.G

    D. Kopa ˇc, C.G. Mundell, J. Japelj, D.M. Arnold, I.A. Steele, C. Guidorzi, S. Dichiara, S. Kobayashi, A. Gomboc, R.M. Harrison, G.P. Lamb, A. Melandri, R.J. Smith, F.J. Virgili, A.J. Castro-Tirado, J. Gorosabel, A. J ¨arvinen, R. S ´anchez-Ram´ırez, S.R. Oates, M. Jel ´ınek, ApJ 813, 1 (2015). DOI 10.1088/0004-637X/813/1/1

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/813/1/1 2015

  23. [23]

    Gomboc, S

    A. Gomboc, S. Kobayashi, C. Guidorzi, A. Melandri, V . Mangano, B. Sbarufatti, C.G. Mundell, P. Schady, R.J. Smith, A.C. Updike, D.A. Kann, K. Misra, E. Rol, A. Pozanenko, A.J. Castro-Tirado, G.C. Anupama, D. Bersier, M.F. Bode, D. Carter, P. Curran, A. Fruchter, J. Graham, D.H. Hartmann, M. Ibrahimov, A. Levan, A. Monfardini, C.J. Mottram, P.T. O’Brien, ...

    work page doi:10.1086/592062 2008

  24. [24]

    Gomboc, S

    A. Gomboc, S. Kobayashi, C.G. Mundell, C. Guidorzi, A. Melandri, I.A. Steele, R.J. Smith, D. Bersier, D. Carter, M.F. Bode, inAmerican Institute of Physics Conference Series , American Insti- tute of Physics Conference Series , vol. 1133, ed. by C. Meegan, C. Kouveliotou, N. Gehrels (2009), American Institute of Physics Conference Series , vol. 1133, pp. ...

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3155867 2009

  25. [25]

    Japelj, D

    J. Japelj, D. Kopa ˇc, S. Kobayashi, R. Harrison, C. Guidorzi, F.J. Virgili, C.G. Mundell, A. Melandri, A. Gomboc, ApJ 785, 84 (2014). DOI 10.1088/0004-637X/785/2/84

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/785/2/84 2014

  26. [26]

    Laskar, K.D

    T. Laskar, K.D. Alexander, E. Berger, W.f. Fong, R. Margutti, I. Shivvers, P.K.G. Williams, D. Kopaˇc, S. Kobayashi, C. Mundell, A. Gomboc, W. Zheng, K.M. Menten, M.L. Graham, A.V . Filippenko, Astrophysical Journal833, 88 (2016). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/88

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/88 2016

  27. [27]

    Laskar, K.D

    T. Laskar, K.D. Alexander, E. Berger, C. Guidorzi, R. Margutti, W.f. Fong, C.D. Kilpatrick, P. Milne, M.R. Drout, C.G. Mundell, S. Kobayashi, R. Lunnan, R. Barniol Duran, K.M. Menten, K. Ioka, P.K.G. Williams, Astrophysical Journal862, 94 (2018). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/aacbcc 22 R.Martone et al

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aacbcc 2018

  28. [28]

    Mundell, I.A

    C.G. Mundell, I.A. Steele, R.J. Smith, S. Kobayashi, A. Melandri, C. Guidorzi, A. Gomboc, C.J. Mottram, D. Clarke, A. Monfardini, D. Carter, D. Bersier, Science 315, 1822 (2007). DOI 10.1126 / science.1138484

    work page 2007

  29. [29]

    Steele, C.G

    I.A. Steele, C.G. Mundell, R.J. Smith, S. Kobayashi, C. Guidorzi, Nature 462, 767 (2009). DOI 10.1038/nature08590

    work page doi:10.1038/nature08590 2009

  30. [30]

    Mundell, D

    C.G. Mundell, D. Kopac, D.M. Arnold, I.A. Steele, A. Gomboc, S. Kobayashi, R.M. Harrison, R.J. Smith, C. Guidorzi, F.J. Virgili, A. Melandri, J. Japelj, Nature 504, 119 (2013). DOI 10.1038/nature12814

    work page doi:10.1038/nature12814 2013

  31. [31]

    Troja, V .M

    E. Troja, V .M. Lipunov, C.G. Mundell, N.R. Butler, A.M. Watson, S. Kobayashi, S.B. Cenko, F.E. Marshall, R. Ricci, A. Fruchter, M.H. Wieringa, E.S. Gorbovskoy, V . Kornilov, A. Kutyrev, W.H. Lee, V . Toy, N.V . Tyurina, N.M. Budnev, D.A.H. Buckley, J. Gonz´alez, O. Gress, A. Horesh, M.I. Panasyuk, J.X. Prochaska, E. Ramirez-Ruiz, R. Rebolo Lopez, M.G. Ri...

    work page doi:10.1038/nature23289 2017

  32. [32]

    Guidorzi, A

    C. Guidorzi, A. Monfardini, A. Gomboc, C.J. Mottram, C.G. Mundell, I.A. Steele, D. Carter, M.F. Bode, R.J. Smith, S.N. Fraser, M.J. Burgdorf, A.M. Newsam, PASP 118, 288 (2006). DOI 10.1086 / 499289

    work page 2006

  33. [33]

    Mundell, C

    C.G. Mundell, C. Guidorzi, I.A. Steele, Advances in Astronomy 2010, 718468 (2010). DOI 10.1155/ 2010/718468

    work page 2010

  34. [34]

    Brown, N

    T.M. Brown, N. Baliber, F.B. Bianco, M. Bowman, B. Burleson, P. Conway, M. Crellin, ´E. Depagne, J. De Vera, B. Dilday, D. Dragomir, M. Dubberley, J.D. Eastman, M. Elphick, M. Falarski, S. Foale, M. Ford, B.J. Fulton, J. Garza, E.L. Gomez, M. Graham, R. Greene, B. Haldeman, E. Hawkins, B. Haworth, R. Haynes, M. Hidas, A.E. Hjelstrom, D.A. Howell, J. Hygel...

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/673168 2013

  35. [35]

    Lavigne, P

    J.M. Lavigne, P. Jean, B. Kandel, V . Borrel, J.P. Roques, G. Lichti, V . Sch ¨onfelder, R. Diehl, R. Georgii, T. Kirchner, P. Durouchoux, B. Cordier, N. Diallo, F. Sanchez, B. Payne, P. Leleux, P. Caraveo, B. Teegarden, J. Matteson, S. Slassi-Sennou, G. Skinner, P. Connell, Nuclear Physics B Proceedings Supplements 60, 69 (1998). DOI 10.1016/S0920-5632(9...

    work page doi:10.1016/s0920-5632(97)00502-1 1998

  36. [36]

    Barthelmy, P

    S.D. Barthelmy, P. Butterworth, T.L. Cline, N. Gehrels, G.J. Fishman, C. Kouveliotou, C.A. Meegan, Astrophysics and Space Science231(1-2), 235 (1995). DOI 10.1007/BF00658623

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00658623 1995

  37. [37]

    Maps of Dust IR Emission for Use in Estimation of Reddening and CMBR Foregrounds

    D.J. Schlegel, D.P. Finkbeiner, M. Davis, ApJ 500, 525 (1998). DOI 10.1086/305772

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/305772 1998

  38. [38]

    Siegel, D

    M. Siegel, D. Burrows, A. Deich, J. Gropp, J. Kennea, S.e. LaPorte, GRB Coordinates Network, Circular Service 22973 (2018)

    work page 2018

  39. [39]

    Martone, C

    R. Martone, C. Guidorzi, S. Kobayashi, C. Mundell, A. Gomboc, I. Steele, A. Cucchiara, D. Morris, GRB Coordinates Network, Circular Service 22976 (2018)

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    Meegan, G

    C. Meegan, G. Lichti, P.N. Bhat, E. Bissaldi, M.S. Briggs, V . Connaughton, R. Diehl, G. Fish- man, J. Greiner, A.S. Hoover, A.J. van der Horst, A. von Kienlin, R.M. Kippen, C. Kouveliotou, S. McBreen, W.S. Paciesas, R. Preece, H. Steinle, M.S. Wallace, R.B. Wilson, C. Wilson-Hodge, ApJ 702, 791 (2009). DOI 10.1088/0004-637X/702/1/791

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/702/1/791 2009

  41. [41]

    Abell, J

    LSST Science Collaboration, P.A. Abell, J. Allison, S.F. Anderson, J.R. Andrew, J.R.P. Angel, L. Ar- mus, D. Arnett, S.J. Asztalos, T.S. Axelrod, et al., arXiv e-prints (2009)

    work page 2009