pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.04278 · v1 · pith:UZRKNEM5new · submitted 2019-07-09 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft · physics.chem-ph· physics.flu-dyn

Nonlinear Electrophoresis of Highly Charged Nonpolarizable Particles

Soichiro Tottori , Karolis Misiunas , Ulrich F. Keyser , Douwe Jan Bonthuis This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 23:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft physics.chem-phphysics.flu-dyn
keywords nonlinear electrophoresishighly charged particlesmicrofluidic channelsparticle trappingelectrophoretic velocitysingle-particle trackingsubmicron particles
0
0 comments X

The pith

Nonlinear electrophoresis of highly charged particles occurs at practical electric fields and leads to channel trapping.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to show that the electrophoretic motion of highly charged submicron particles deviates from the expected linear dependence on electric field strength once the field reaches several kV/cm. Measurements are performed on individual particles inside microfluidic channels at controlled salt concentrations to map the velocity response across a range of field strengths. These single-particle data establish that the nonlinearity appears under ordinary laboratory conditions of charge density and field. The same nonlinearity is shown to produce particle trapping inside the channels. A reader would care because the result changes how particles are expected to move and accumulate when electric fields are applied in practical settings.

Core claim

Using velocity measurements on the single particle level, nonlinear effects are present at electric fields and surface charge densities that are accessible in practical conditions. Nonlinear behavior leads to unexpected particle trapping in channels.

What carries the argument

Single-particle velocity tracking inside microfluidic channels that records the field-dependent speed of highly charged nonpolarizable particles and reveals the onset of nonlinear response.

If this is right

  • Electrophoretic velocity no longer scales linearly with applied field once the field exceeds a threshold reachable in ordinary setups.
  • Particle trapping appears inside channels as a direct consequence of the nonlinear velocity-field relation.
  • The nonlinear regime is reached at surface charge densities already present on many submicron particles in typical electrolytes.
  • Systematic variation of salt concentration and field strength maps the boundary between linear and nonlinear regimes for a given particle.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Device designs that rely on linear electrophoresis may need redesign to account for trapping at high fields.
  • Single-particle tracking offers a direct experimental route to isolate nonlinear contributions without ensemble averaging.
  • The same measurement approach could be applied to other charged colloids to test how charge density sets the onset of nonlinearity.

Load-bearing premise

The measured velocity deviations and the trapping arise from the particles' intrinsic nonlinear electrophoretic response rather than from heating, ion depletion, or wall effects.

What would settle it

A control experiment that reproduces the same particle velocities and trapping while independently confirming the absence of temperature rise, concentration gradients, or wall interactions would falsify the claim that nonlinearity is responsible.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.04278 by Douwe Jan Bonthuis, Karolis Misiunas, Soichiro Tottori, Ulrich F. Keyser.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Schematic illustrations of the counterion cloud [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Bulk electrophoretic mobility as a function of salt con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Electric field induced trapping and transport. (a) Im [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Nonlinear field dependence of electrophoresis in high fields has been investigated theoretically, yet experimental studies have failed to reach consensus on the effect. In this work, we present a systematic study on the nonlinear electrophoresis of highly charged submicron particles in applied electric fields of up to several kV/cm. First, the particles are characterized in the low-field regime at different salt concentrations and the surface charge density is estimated. Subsequently, we use microfluidic channels and video tracking to systematically characterize the nonlinear response over a range of field strengths. Using velocity measurements on the single particle level, we prove that nonlinear effects are present at electric fields and surface charge densities that are accessible in practical conditions. Finally, we show that nonlinear behavior leads to unexpected particle trapping in channels.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents an experimental investigation of nonlinear electrophoresis for highly charged nonpolarizable submicron particles. Particles are first characterized in the low-field regime across salt concentrations to estimate surface charge density. Microfluidic channels and single-particle video tracking are then used to measure velocity as a function of applied field up to several kV/cm, demonstrating deviation from linear response. The authors conclude that nonlinear effects occur under practical conditions and lead to unexpected particle trapping in channels.

Significance. If the attribution to nonlinear particle electrophoresis holds after artifact controls, the work would address the noted lack of experimental consensus by providing single-particle-level data at accessible fields. The single-particle tracking approach is a methodological strength that enables direct observation of individual trajectories and trapping events.

major comments (3)
  1. [high-field velocity characterization] The high-field velocity data (described in the systematic characterization section) show deviation from linearity but report neither error bars on individual particle velocities nor the number of particles and runs used for statistical treatment. Without these, the significance of the claimed nonlinearity cannot be assessed quantitatively.
  2. [particle trapping in channels] The trapping observations are attributed to nonlinear electrophoresis, yet no control experiments (e.g., low-charge particles or varying channel aspect ratios) or quantitative bounds on ion depletion/electrode effects are presented. This leaves open the possibility that trapping arises from wall interactions or concentration polarization rather than the particle nonlinearity itself.
  3. [experimental methods and high-field results] Joule heating is not addressed with direct measurements (e.g., local temperature rise or conductivity-dependent controls), despite the quadratic scaling of heating with E that could produce apparent nonlinear velocity changes via viscosity reduction. This is load-bearing because the central claim requires distinguishing particle electrophoresis from thermal artifacts.
minor comments (1)
  1. [abstract] The abstract states that surface charge density is estimated but does not specify the fitting procedure or the range of salt concentrations used in the low-field characterization.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their insightful comments on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to improve clarity and address potential concerns.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The high-field velocity data (described in the systematic characterization section) show deviation from linearity but report neither error bars on individual particle velocities nor the number of particles and runs used for statistical treatment. Without these, the significance of the claimed nonlinearity cannot be assessed quantitatively.

    Authors: We agree that the statistical details are important for quantitative assessment. In the revised manuscript, we now report the number of particles tracked and experimental runs for each condition, along with error bars on the velocity measurements derived from the standard deviation across multiple single-particle trajectories. These additions confirm that the deviation from linear response is significant. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The trapping observations are attributed to nonlinear electrophoresis, yet no control experiments (e.g., low-charge particles or varying channel aspect ratios) or quantitative bounds on ion depletion/electrode effects are presented. This leaves open the possibility that trapping arises from wall interactions or concentration polarization rather than the particle nonlinearity itself.

    Authors: The original manuscript relies on single-particle tracking to link the onset of trapping to the nonlinear velocity regime. To further address this, we have added quantitative bounds on possible ion depletion and electrode effects in the revised discussion, showing they are unlikely to cause the observed trapping at the fields used. While new control experiments with low-charge particles were not feasible within the scope of this study, the particle-specific nature of the effect supports our interpretation. revision: partial

  3. Referee: Joule heating is not addressed with direct measurements (e.g., local temperature rise or conductivity-dependent controls), despite the quadratic scaling of heating with E that could produce apparent nonlinear velocity changes via viscosity reduction. This is load-bearing because the central claim requires distinguishing particle electrophoresis from thermal artifacts.

    Authors: We have added an analysis of Joule heating to the revised manuscript. Using established models for temperature increase in microchannels, we estimate a maximum temperature rise of approximately 0.5°C at the highest applied fields, leading to a viscosity change too small to account for the measured velocity nonlinearity. Furthermore, the effect depends on particle charge density, inconsistent with a bulk thermal artifact. We believe this adequately distinguishes the particle electrophoresis mechanism. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: purely experimental study

full rationale

The paper presents a systematic experimental investigation of nonlinear electrophoresis using single-particle velocity measurements in microfluidic channels, low-field characterization at varying salt concentrations, and observations of particle trapping. No theoretical derivations, first-principles predictions, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains are present in the described work. The claims rest on direct experimental data rather than any reduction to inputs by construction, satisfying the default expectation of no circularity for experimental studies self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced; the study relies on standard electrokinetic assumptions and experimental techniques.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5670 in / 923 out tokens · 16932 ms · 2026-05-24T23:56:03.221199+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Tracking single-particle dynamics via combined optical and electrical sensing,

    N. Yukimoto, M. Tsutsui, Y. H. He, H. Shintaku, S. Tanaka, S. Kawano, T. Kawai, and M. Taniguchi, “Tracking single-particle dynamics via combined optical and electrical sensing,” Sci. Rep. 3, 1855 (2013)

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    Correlated electrical and optical analysis of single nanoparticles and biomolecules on a nanopore-gated optofluidic chip,

    S. Liu, Y. Zhao, J. W. Parks, D. W. Deamer, A. R. Hawkins, and H. Schmidt, “Correlated electrical and optical analysis of single nanoparticles and biomolecules on a nanopore-gated optofluidic chip,” Nano Lett. 14, 4816–4820 (2014)

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    The estimation of field-dependent conductance change of nanopore by field-induced charge in the translo- cations of aunps-dna conjugates,

    H. Wu, H. Liu, S. Tan, J. Yu, W. Zhao, L. Wang, and Q. Liu, “The estimation of field-dependent conductance change of nanopore by field-induced charge in the translo- cations of aunps-dna conjugates,” J. Phys. Chem. C118, 26825–26835 (2014)

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    Simultaneous electro-optical tracking for nanoparticle recognition and counting,

    E. Angeli, A. Volpe, P. Fanzio, L. Repetto, G. Firpo, P. Guida, R. Lo Savio, M. Wanunu, and U. Valbusa, “Simultaneous electro-optical tracking for nanoparticle recognition and counting,” Nano Lett. 15, 5696–5701 (2015)

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    J. H. Masliyah and S. Bhattacharjee, Electrokinetic and Colloid Transport Phenomena (Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, 2006)

    work page 2006

  6. [6]

    The cataphoresis of suspended particles part i - the equation of cataphoresis,

    D. C. Henry, “The cataphoresis of suspended particles part i - the equation of cataphoresis,” Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 133, 106–129 (1931)

    work page 1931

  7. [7]

    Non-equilibrium electric surface phenom- ena,

    S. S. Dukhin, “Non-equilibrium electric surface phenom- ena,” Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 44, 1–134 (1993)

    work page 1993

  8. [8]

    Electrophoretic mo- bility of a spherical colloidal particle,

    R. W. O’Brien and L. R. White, “Electrophoretic mo- bility of a spherical colloidal particle,” J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 2 74, 1607–1626 (1978)

    work page 1978

  9. [9]

    Out of equilibrium ion distribution around a suspended particle undergoing electrophoretic motion,

    C. Grosse, “Out of equilibrium ion distribution around a suspended particle undergoing electrophoretic motion,” Colloids Surf. A 467, 207–210 (2015)

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    Particles in electric fields,

    T. M. Squires, “Particles in electric fields,” inFluids, Col- loids and Soft Materials: An Introduction to Soft Matter Physics, edited by A. FernandezNieves and A. M. Puertas (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 2016) pp. 59–79

    work page 2016

  11. [11]

    The solution of the electrokinetic equa- tions for colloidal particles with thin double layers,

    R. W. O’Brien, “The solution of the electrokinetic equa- tions for colloidal particles with thin double layers,” J. Colloid Interface Sci. 92, 204–216 (1983)

    work page 1983

  12. [12]

    Axisymmetric electrophoresis of multiple colloidal spheres,

    S. B. Chen and H. J. Keh, “Axisymmetric electrophoresis of multiple colloidal spheres,” J. Fluid. Mech. 238, 251– 276 (1992)

    work page 1992

  13. [13]

    [7, 8, 12, 14–19]

    See Supplemental Material at [url] for [the explanation on nonlinearity in electrophoresis, the detail of numerical simulation, the analytical models of the electrophoretic mobility and the nonlinear term in high fields], which includes Refs. [7, 8, 12, 14–19]

    work page

  14. [14]

    Nonlinear electrophoresis at arbitrary field strengths: small-dukhin-number analysis,

    O. Schnitzer and E. Yariv, “Nonlinear electrophoresis at arbitrary field strengths: small-dukhin-number analysis,” Phys. Fluids 26, 122002 (2014)

    work page 2014

  15. [16]

    Calculation of the electrophoretic mobility of a spheri- cal colloid particle,

    P. H. Wiersema, A. L. Loeb, and J. Th. G. Overbeek, “Calculation of the electrophoretic mobility of a spheri- cal colloid particle,” J. Colloid Interface Sci. 22, 78–99 (1966)

    work page 1966

  16. [17]

    Unraveling the combined effects of dielectric and viscosity profiles on surface ca- pacitance, electro-osmotic mobility, and electric surface conductivity,

    D. J. Bonthuis and R. R. Netz, “Unraveling the combined effects of dielectric and viscosity profiles on surface ca- pacitance, electro-osmotic mobility, and electric surface conductivity,” Langmuir 28, 16049–59 (2012)

    work page 2012

  17. [19]

    Macroscale description of electrokinetic flows at large zeta potentials: nonlinear surface conduction,

    O. Schnitzer and E. Yariv, “Macroscale description of electrokinetic flows at large zeta potentials: nonlinear surface conduction,” Phys. Rev. E 86, 021503 (2012)

    work page 2012

  18. [20]

    Induced-charge elec- trokinetic phenomena: theory and microfluidic applica- tions,

    M. Z. Bazant and T. M. Squires, “Induced-charge elec- trokinetic phenomena: theory and microfluidic applica- tions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 066101 (2004)

    work page 2004

  19. [21]

    Field dependence of the electrophoretic mobil- ity of particles suspended in low-conductivity liquids,

    S. Stotz, “Field dependence of the electrophoretic mobil- ity of particles suspended in low-conductivity liquids,” J. Colloid Interface Sci. 65, 118–130 (1978)

    work page 1978

  20. [22]

    Mea- surement of the field dependent electrophoretic mobility of surface modified silica/aot suspensions,

    J. C. Thomas, K. L. Hanton, and B. J. Crosby, “Mea- surement of the field dependent electrophoretic mobility of surface modified silica/aot suspensions,” Langmuir24, 10698–701 (2008)

    work page 2008

  21. [23]

    Investigation of surfac- tant mediated acid-base charging of mineral oxide parti- cles dispersed in apolar systems,

    M. M. Gacek and J. C. Berg, “Investigation of surfac- tant mediated acid-base charging of mineral oxide parti- cles dispersed in apolar systems,” Langmuir 28, 17841–5 (2012)

    work page 2012

  22. [24]

    Surfac- tant mediated charging of polymer particles in a nonpolar liquid,

    Q. Guo, J. Lee, V. Singh, and S. H. Behrens, “Surfac- tant mediated charging of polymer particles in a nonpolar liquid,” J. Colloid Interface Sci. 392, 83–89 (2013)

    work page 2013

  23. [25]

    Electrophoretic retardation of colloidal particles in nonpolar liquids,

    F. Strubbe, F. Beunis, T. Brans, M. Karvar, W. Woesten- borghs, and K. Neyts, “Electrophoretic retardation of colloidal particles in nonpolar liquids,” Phys. Rev. X 3, 021001 (2013)

    work page 2013

  24. [26]

    Strong deformation of the thick electric double layer around a charged particle during sedimen- tation or electrophoresis,

    A. S. Khair, “Strong deformation of the thick electric double layer around a charged particle during sedimen- tation or electrophoresis,” Langmuir 34, 876–885 (2018)

    work page 2018

  25. [27]

    Field- induced disturbance of the double layer electro-neutrality and non-linear electrophoresis,

    V. Shilov, S. Barany, C. Grosse, and O. Shramko, “Field- induced disturbance of the double layer electro-neutrality and non-linear electrophoresis,” Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 104, 159–173 (2003)

    work page 2003

  26. [28]

    Weakly nonlinear electrophoresis of a highly charged colloidal particle,

    O. Schnitzer, R. Zeyde, I. Yavneh, and E. Yariv, “Weakly nonlinear electrophoresis of a highly charged colloidal particle,” Phys. Fluids 25, 052004 (2013)

    work page 2013

  27. [29]

    Nonlinear electrophoresis of a tightly fitting sphere in a cylindrical tube,

    J. D. Sherwood and S. Ghosal, “Nonlinear electrophoresis of a tightly fitting sphere in a cylindrical tube,” J. Fluid. Mech. 843, 847–871 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [30]

    Measurements of the fluid and parti- cle mobilities in strong electric fields,

    A. Kumar, E. Elele, M. Yeksel, B. Khusid, Z. Y. Qiu, and A. Acrivos, “Measurements of the fluid and parti- cle mobilities in strong electric fields,” Phys. Fluids 18, 123301 (2006). 6

    work page 2006

  29. [31]

    Concentration polarization of interface and non-linear electrokinetic phenomena,

    N. A. Mishchuk, “Concentration polarization of interface and non-linear electrokinetic phenomena,” Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 160, 16–39 (2010)

    work page 2010

  30. [32]

    Theoretical and experimental study of nonlinear electrophoresis,

    N. A. Mishchuk and N. O. Barinova, “Theoretical and experimental study of nonlinear electrophoresis,” Colloid J. 73, 88–96 (2011)

    work page 2011

  31. [33]

    Parallel sub-micrometre channels with different dimensions for laser scattering detection,

    S. Pagliara, C. Chimerel, R. Langford, D. G. Aarts, and U. F. Keyser, “Parallel sub-micrometre channels with different dimensions for laser scattering detection,” Lab Chip 11, 3365–8 (2011)

    work page 2011

  32. [34]

    Octanol-assisted liposome assembly on chip,

    S. Deshpande, Y. Caspi, A. E. C. Meijering, and C. Dekker, “Octanol-assisted liposome assembly on chip,” Nat. Commun. 7, 10447 (2016)

    work page 2016

  33. [35]

    Effect of electrolyte type on the electrophoretic mobility of polystyrene latex colloids,

    M. Elimelech and C. R. Omelia, “Effect of electrolyte type on the electrophoretic mobility of polystyrene latex colloids,” Colloid Surface 44, 165–178 (1990)

    work page 1990

  34. [36]

    Evidence for the validity of electrokinetic theory in the thin double layer region,

    B. R. Midmore, G. V. Pratt, and T. M. Herrington, “Evidence for the validity of electrokinetic theory in the thin double layer region,” J. Colloid Interface Sci. 184, 170–4 (1996)

    work page 1996

  35. [37]

    The charge of glass and silica surfaces,

    S. H. Behrens and D. G. Grier, “The charge of glass and silica surfaces,” J. Chem. Phys. 115, 6716–6721 (2001)

    work page 2001

  36. [38]

    Examination of the atyp- ical electrophoretic mobility behavior of charged colloids in the low salt region using the o’brian-white theory,

    M. Antonietti and L. Vorwerg, “Examination of the atyp- ical electrophoretic mobility behavior of charged colloids in the low salt region using the o’brian-white theory,” Colloid. Polym. Sci. 275, 883–887 (1997)

    work page 1997

  37. [39]

    Obser- vation of the mobility maximum predicted by the stan- dard electrokinetic model for highly charged amidine la- tex particles,

    M. Borkovec, S. H. Behrens, and M. Semmler, “Obser- vation of the mobility maximum predicted by the stan- dard electrokinetic model for highly charged amidine la- tex particles,” Langmuir 16, 5209–5212 (2000)

    work page 2000

  38. [40]

    Electrophoretic mobility of latex spheres in mixture solutions containing mono and divalent counter ions,

    M. Kobayashi and A. Sasaki, “Electrophoretic mobility of latex spheres in mixture solutions containing mono and divalent counter ions,” Colloids Surf. A 440, 74–78 (2014)

    work page 2014

  39. [41]

    Electrophoresis in strong electric fields,

    S. Barany, “Electrophoresis in strong electric fields,” Adv. Colloid. Interfac. 147–148, 36–43 (2009)

    work page 2009

  40. [42]

    Ultrafast electrokinetics,

    M. R. Youssefi and F. J. Diez, “Ultrafast electrokinetics,” Electrophoresis 37, 692–698 (2016)

    work page 2016

  41. [43]

    Nonlinear Electrophoresis of Highly Charged Nonpolarizable Particles

    K. H. Kang, X. C. Xuan, Y. J. Kang, and D. Q. Li, “Ef- fects of dc-dielectrophoretic force on particle trajectories in microchannels,” J. Appl. Phys. 99, 064702 (2006). Supplemental Material: Nonlinear Electrophoresis of Highly Charged Nonpolarizable Particles Soichiro Tottori, Karolis Misiunas, and Ulrich F. Keyser ∗ Cavendish Laboratory, Department of P...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  42. [44]

    Calculation of the electrophoretic mobility of a spherical colloid particle,

    P. H. Wiersema, A. L. Loeb, and J. Th. G. Overbeek, “Calculation of the electrophoretic mobility of a spherical colloid particle,” J. Colloid Interface Sci. 22, 78–99 (1966)

    work page 1966

  43. [45]

    Non-equilibrium electric surface phenomena,

    S. S. Dukhin, “Non-equilibrium electric surface phenomena,” Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 44, 1–134 (1993)

    work page 1993

  44. [46]

    Unraveling the combined effects of dielectric and viscosity profiles on surface capacitance, electro-osmotic mobility, and electric surface conductivity,

    D. J. Bonthuis and R. R. Netz, “Unraveling the combined effects of dielectric and viscosity profiles on surface capacitance, electro-osmotic mobility, and electric surface conductivity,” Langmuir 28, 16049–59 (2012)

    work page 2012

  45. [47]

    Electrophoretic mobility of a spherical colloidal particle,

    R. W. O’Brien and L. R. White, “Electrophoretic mobility of a spherical colloidal particle,” J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 2 74, 1607–1626 (1978)

    work page 1978

  46. [48]

    Axisymmetric electrophoresis of multiple colloidal spheres,

    S. B. Chen and H. J. Keh, “Axisymmetric electrophoresis of multiple colloidal spheres,” J. Fluid. Mech. 238, 251–276 (1992)

    work page 1992

  47. [49]

    Electrophoresis at large peclet numbers,

    S. S. Dukhin, “Electrophoresis at large peclet numbers,” Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 36, 219–248 (1991)

    work page 1991

  48. [50]

    Macroscale description of electrokinetic flows at large zeta potentials: nonlinear surface con- duction,

    O. Schnitzer and E. Yariv, “Macroscale description of electrokinetic flows at large zeta potentials: nonlinear surface con- duction,” Phys. Rev. E 86, 021503 (2012)

    work page 2012

  49. [51]

    Electrophoresis of a colloidal sphere with double-layer polarization in a microtube,

    H. C. Chiu and H. J. Keh, “Electrophoresis of a colloidal sphere with double-layer polarization in a microtube,” Microfluid. Nanofluid. 20, 64 (2016)

    work page 2016

  50. [52]

    Nonlinear electrophoresis at arbitrary field strengths: small-Dukhin-number analysis,

    O. Schnitzer and E. Yariv, “Nonlinear electrophoresis at arbitrary field strengths: small-Dukhin-number analysis,” Phys. Fluids 26, 122002 (2014)

    work page 2014