pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.07636 · v1 · pith:IK64O5UQnew · submitted 2019-07-17 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.mtrl-sci· cond-mat.quant-gas· cond-mat.stat-mech· cond-mat.str-el

Laser control of magnonic topological phases in antiferromagnets

Kouki Nakata , Se Kwon Kim , Shintaro Takayoshi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 20:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-el
keywords magnon topological phasesantiferromagnetsFloquet theoryAharonov-Casher effectlaser controlspin Nernst effectthermal Hall effectedge magnon states
0
0 comments X

The pith

A linearly polarized laser generates helical edge magnon states in antiferromagnets while circular polarization generates chiral edge states whose direction reverses with laser handedness.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies Floquet theory to the Aharonov-Casher effect in insulating antiferromagnets to derive an effective Hamiltonian under high-frequency laser driving. It shows that linear laser polarization produces helical edge magnon modes and a magnonic spin Nernst effect, while circular polarization produces chiral edge modes and a magnonic thermal Hall effect. The sign of the thermal Hall effect flips when the circular polarization changes from left to right. A sympathetic reader would care because this offers optical control over nonequilibrium magnon transport and topology without needing adiabatic conditions.

Core claim

Using the effective Floquet Hamiltonian obtained from the high-frequency inverse frequency expansion, a linearly polarized laser can generate helical edge magnon states and induce the magnonic spin Nernst effect, whereas a circularly polarized laser can generate chiral edge magnon states and induce the magnonic thermal Hall effect. In particular, the direction of the magnon chiral edge modes and the resulting thermal Hall effect can be controlled by the chirality of the circularly polarized laser through the change from left-circular to right-circular polarization.

What carries the argument

Effective Floquet Hamiltonian obtained via inverse-frequency expansion of the time-periodic laser electric field acting through the Aharonov-Casher effect on magnons.

If this is right

  • Linear polarization produces helical edge magnon states that support a spin Nernst effect.
  • Circular polarization produces chiral edge magnon states that support a thermal Hall effect.
  • Reversing the handedness of circular polarization reverses the direction of chiral edge modes and the sign of the thermal Hall effect.
  • Nonequilibrium magnon dynamics away from the adiabatic limit can be used to control topological transport.
  • Laser polarization provides a handle to design and switch magnon topological properties in antiferromagnets.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same polarization-control mechanism might be testable in thin-film antiferromagnets by measuring transverse heat flow under focused laser spots of varying polarization.
  • If the high-frequency approximation holds, the approach could be extended to time-dependent polarization patterns to create dynamically reconfigurable magnon waveguides.
  • The results suggest that similar Floquet driving could be applied to other insulating magnets where the Aharonov-Casher phase is present.

Load-bearing premise

The laser electric field can be treated as a clean time-periodic perturbation whose high-frequency inverse-frequency expansion yields a valid effective Floquet Hamiltonian without additional damping or heating channels.

What would settle it

Measuring whether the magnonic thermal Hall conductivity reverses sign when the driving laser is switched from left-circular to right-circular polarization at fixed frequency and intensity, or whether helical versus chiral edge magnon modes appear under linear versus circular polarization.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.07636 by Kouki Nakata, Se Kwon Kim, Shintaro Takayoshi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Schematic representation of magnon states in two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the laser control of magnon topological phases induced by the Aharonov-Casher effect in insulating antiferromagnets (AFs). Since the laser electric field can be considered as a time-periodic perturbation, we apply the Floquet theory and perform the inverse frequency expansion by focusing on the high frequency region. Using the obtained effective Floquet Hamiltonian, we study nonequilibrium magnon dynamics away from the adiabatic limit and its effect on topological phenomena. We show that a linearly polarized laser can generate helical edge magnon states and induce the magnonic spin Nernst effect, whereas a circularly polarized laser can generate chiral edge magnon states and induce the magnonic thermal Hall effect. In particular, in the latter, we find that the direction of the magnon chiral edge modes and the resulting thermal Hall effect can be controlled by the chirality of the circularly polarized laser through the change from the left-circular to the right-circular polarization. Our results thus provide a handle to control and design magnon topological properties in the insulating AF.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper applies Floquet theory with a high-frequency inverse-frequency expansion to the magnon Hamiltonian of an insulating antiferromagnet, where the laser electric field couples via the Aharonov-Casher phase. It claims that a linearly polarized laser generates helical edge magnon states and induces the magnonic spin Nernst effect, while a circularly polarized laser generates chiral edge magnon states and induces the magnonic thermal Hall effect whose sign is controllable by the laser handedness.

Significance. If the effective Floquet Hamiltonian and its topological consequences are valid, the work supplies a concrete mechanism for all-optical control of magnon edge modes and associated thermal responses in antiferromagnets, extending Floquet engineering to magnonics with potential implications for dissipationless magnon transport.

major comments (2)
  1. [Floquet theory and effective Hamiltonian section (near the inverse-frequency expansion)] The central claim that the inverse-frequency expansion yields edge states and quantized thermal responses rests on the assumption that the high-frequency effective Hamiltonian remains valid in the presence of realistic damping and heating channels; however, no estimate is given for the laser frequency window relative to the exchange J, Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya strength, or Gilbert damping rate, nor is any check performed on the quasienergy spectrum under finite damping.
  2. [Nonequilibrium magnon dynamics and transport calculations] The derivation of the magnonic spin Nernst and thermal Hall conductivities from the effective Floquet bands is presented without explicit comparison to the adiabatic limit or to the scale of magnon-phonon scattering; this leaves open whether the nonequilibrium steady state required for the claimed transport survives beyond the clean, undamped model.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Model Hamiltonian] Notation for the Aharonov-Casher phase and the resulting vector potential in the magnon Hamiltonian should be defined explicitly with a reference equation number.
  2. [Figures showing edge modes and transport] Figure captions for the edge-state dispersions and thermal Hall conductivity plots should state the laser amplitude and frequency values used.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and the constructive comments on the applicability of the high-frequency Floquet approach. We address each major point below and indicate where revisions have been made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Floquet theory and effective Hamiltonian section (near the inverse-frequency expansion)] The central claim that the inverse-frequency expansion yields edge states and quantized thermal responses rests on the assumption that the high-frequency effective Hamiltonian remains valid in the presence of realistic damping and heating channels; however, no estimate is given for the laser frequency window relative to the exchange J, Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya strength, or Gilbert damping rate, nor is any check performed on the quasienergy spectrum under finite damping.

    Authors: We agree that explicit estimates strengthen the presentation. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph in the Floquet-theory section stating the validity window: the inverse-frequency expansion requires ω ≫ J, D (with J, D the exchange and DM scales). For typical insulating antiferromagnets this places the driving in the THz range. Gilbert damping rates satisfy αJ with α ∼ 10^{-3}–10^{-2}, so the damping frequency remains well below J and the high-frequency condition is preserved. A full numerical diagonalization of the damped quasienergy spectrum lies outside the effective-Hamiltonian framework employed here; we therefore limit the claim to the weak-damping regime where topological gaps remain open. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Nonequilibrium magnon dynamics and transport calculations] The derivation of the magnonic spin Nernst and thermal Hall conductivities from the effective Floquet bands is presented without explicit comparison to the adiabatic limit or to the scale of magnon-phonon scattering; this leaves open whether the nonequilibrium steady state required for the claimed transport survives beyond the clean, undamped model.

    Authors: The manuscript explicitly targets the high-frequency regime away from the adiabatic limit, as stated in the abstract and introduction. The conductivities are obtained from the effective static Floquet Hamiltonian via the Kubo formula in the clean limit. We have added a short discussion in the transport section noting that the laser-induced gap must exceed typical magnon-phonon scattering rates (which are small at low T in insulators) for the nonequilibrium steady state to be maintained. Direct comparison with the adiabatic (ω → 0) limit is omitted because that regime lies outside the high-frequency expansion used throughout the work. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in standard Floquet application to magnon model

full rationale

The derivation applies Floquet theory and high-frequency inverse-frequency expansion to a time-periodic laser perturbation (via Aharonov-Casher phase) on the AF magnon Hamiltonian. The resulting effective Hamiltonian's edge modes and transport responses (spin Nernst, thermal Hall) are obtained directly from the quasienergy spectrum without any reduction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations. The chain is a standard, externally verifiable application of established methods; no quoted steps exhibit the enumerated circular patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the Floquet high-frequency expansion and the Aharonov-Casher coupling for magnons; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Laser electric field acts as a clean time-periodic perturbation amenable to inverse-frequency Floquet expansion
    Invoked to obtain the effective Hamiltonian that controls the topological phases

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5735 in / 1224 out tokens · 24341 ms · 2026-05-24T20:14:55.427110+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

118 extracted references · 118 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    This strategy is applicable to general time-periodic systems

    Floquet Hamiltonian and high frequency expansion First let us explain the derivation of the Floquet ef- fective model and the high frequency expansion. This strategy is applicable to general time-periodic systems. Assume that the Hamiltonian has a temporal periodicity H(t) =H(t +T ), whereT is the period. We can perform the Fourier transform on the time-d...

    work page

  2. [2]

    1 to the insulating AF with the laser application

    Application to the insulating AF Next we apply the Floquet theory described in Sec. 1 to the insulating AF with the laser application. Section III A in the main text: Each Fourier compo- nentHm [Eq. (A.1)] for the periodic AC vector potential of Am(t) = (E/c)(0,x cos(Ωt), 0) becomes H0 = 1 2m [ p2 x +p2 y + 1 2 (gµB c )2(E c )2 x2 ] + ∆, H1 =H−1 =σ 1 2m g...

    work page

  3. [3]

    A. V. Chumak, V. I. Vasyuchka, A. A. Serga, and B. Hillebrands, Nat. Phys. 11, 453 (2015)

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Nakata, P

    K. Nakata, P. Simon, and D. Loss, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 50, 114004 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Jungwirth, X

    T. Jungwirth, X. Marti, P. Wadley, and J. Wunderlich, Nat. Nanotech. 11, 231 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    E. V. Gomonaya and V. M. Loktev, Low Temp. Phys. 40, 17 (2014)

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    Baltz, A

    V. Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono, and Y. Tserkovnyak, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015005 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    S. O. Demokritov, V. E. Demidov, O. Dzyapko, G. A. Melkov, A. A. Serga, B. Hillebrands, and A. N. Slavin, Nature 443, 430 (2006)

    work page 2006

  9. [9]

    Shindou, R

    R. Shindou, R. Matsumoto, S. Murakami, and J. Ohe, Phys. Rev. B 87, 174427 (2013)

    work page 2013

  10. [10]

    Shindou, J

    R. Shindou, J. Ohe, R. Matsumoto, S. Murakami, and E. Saitoh, Phys. Rev. B 87, 174402 (2013)

    work page 2013

  11. [11]

    Nakata, S

    K. Nakata, S. K. Kim, J. Klinovaja, and D. Loss, Phys. Rev. B 96, 224414 (2017)

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Proskurin, R

    I. Proskurin, R. L. Stamps, A. S. Ovchinnikov, and J. Kishine, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 177202 (2017)

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    Proskurin, A

    I. Proskurin, A. S. Ovchinnikov, J. Kishine, and R. L. Stamps, Phys. Rev. B 98, 134422 (2018)

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    M. W. Daniels, R. Cheng, W. Yu, J. Xiao, and D. Xiao, Phys. Rev. B 98, 134450 (2018)

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    Aharonov and A

    Y. Aharonov and A. Casher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 319 (1984)

    work page 1984

  16. [16]

    Nakata, J

    K. Nakata, J. Klinovaja, and D. Loss, Phys. Rev. B 95, 125429 (2017)

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    S. Iwai, M. Ono, A. Maeda, H. Matsuzaki, H. Kishida, H. Okamoto, and Y. Tokura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 057401 (2003)

    work page 2003

  18. [18]

    Ishikawa, Y

    T. Ishikawa, Y. Sagae, Y. Naitoh, Y. Kawakami, H. Itoh, K. Yamamoto, K. Yakushi, H. Kishida, T. Sasaki, S. Ishihara, et al., Nat. Comm. 5, 5528 (2014)

    work page 2014

  19. [19]

    Oka and H

    T. Oka and H. Aoki, Phys. Rev. B79, 081406(R) (2009)

    work page 2009

  20. [20]

    Kitagawa, T

    T. Kitagawa, T. Oka, A. Brataas, L. Fu, and E. Demler, Phys. Rev. B 84, 235108 (2011)

    work page 2011

  21. [21]

    Mikami, S

    T. Mikami, S. Kitamura, K. Yasuda, N. Tsuji, T. Oka, and H. Aoki, Phys. Rev. B 93, 144307 (2016)

    work page 2016

  22. [22]

    Klinovaja, P

    J. Klinovaja, P. Stano, and D. Loss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 176401 (2016)

    work page 2016

  23. [23]

    Thakurathi, D

    M. Thakurathi, D. Loss, and J. Klinovaja, Phys. Rev. B 95, 155407 (2017)

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    Kimel, A

    A. Kimel, A. Kirilyuk, P. Usachev, R. Pisarev, A. Bal- bashov, and T. Rasing, Nature 435, 655 (2005). 9

    work page 2005

  25. [25]

    Kirilyuk, A

    A. Kirilyuk, A. V. Kimel, and T. Rasing, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2731 (2010)

    work page 2010

  26. [26]

    Takayoshi, H

    S. Takayoshi, H. Aoki, and T. Oka, Phys. Rev. B 90, 085150 (2014)

    work page 2014

  27. [27]

    Takayoshi, M

    S. Takayoshi, M. Sato, and T. Oka, Phys. Rev. B 90, 214413 (2014)

    work page 2014

  28. [28]

    M. Sato, S. Takayoshi, and T. Oka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 147202 (2016)

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    Kosen, R

    S. Kosen, R. G. E. Morris, A. F. van Loo, and A. D. Karenowska, Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 012402 (2018)

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    Nakata, P

    K. Nakata, P. Simon, and D. Loss, Phys. Rev. B 92, 134425 (2015)

    work page 2015

  31. [31]

    Adachi, K

    H. Adachi, K. Uchida, E. Saitoh, J. Ohe, S. Takahashi, and S. Maekawa, Apply. Phys. Lett. 97, 252506 (2010)

    work page 2010

  32. [32]

    Prasai, B

    N. Prasai, B. A. Trump, G. G. Marcus, A. Akopyan, S. X. Huang, T. M. McQueen, and J. L. Cohn, Phys. Rev. B 95, 224407 (2017)

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    Bukov, L

    M. Bukov, L. D. Alessio, and A. Polkovnikov, Adv. Phys. 64, 139 (2015)

    work page 2015

  34. [34]

    Katsura, N

    H. Katsura, N. Nagaosa, and P. A. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 066403 (2010)

    work page 2010

  35. [35]

    Matsumoto and S

    R. Matsumoto and S. Murakami, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 197202 (2011)

    work page 2011

  36. [36]

    Matsumoto and S

    R. Matsumoto and S. Murakami, Phys. Rev. B 84, 184406 (2011)

    work page 2011

  37. [37]

    Murakami and A

    S. Murakami and A. Okamoto, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 86, 011010 (2017)

    work page 2017

  38. [38]

    Ohnuma, H

    Y. Ohnuma, H. Adachi, E. Saitoh, and S. Maekawa, Phys. Rev. B 87, 014423 (2013)

    work page 2013

  39. [39]

    Cheng, S

    R. Cheng, S. Okamoto, and D. Xiao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 217202 (2016)

    work page 2016

  40. [40]

    V. A. Zyuzin and A. A. Kovalev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 217203 (2016)

    work page 2016

  41. [41]

    Bloch, Z

    F. Bloch, Z. Physik 61, 206 (1930)

    work page 1930

  42. [42]

    Kittel, Phys

    C. Kittel, Phys. Rev. 73, 155 (1948)

    work page 1948

  43. [43]

    Holstein and H

    T. Holstein and H. Primakoff, Phys. Rev. 58, 1098 (1940)

    work page 1940

  44. [44]

    P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. 86, 694 (1952)

    work page 1952

  45. [45]

    Kubo, Phys

    R. Kubo, Phys. Rev. 87, 568 (1952)

    work page 1952

  46. [46]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010)

    work page 2010

  47. [47]

    X. L. Qi and S. C. Zhang, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011)

    work page 2011

  48. [48]

    [113] for a magnonic TI in insulating ferrimag- nets

    See Ref. [113] for a magnonic TI in insulating ferrimag- nets

    work page

  49. [49]

    Mignani, J

    R. Mignani, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 24, L421 (1991)

    work page 1991

  50. [50]

    A. V. Balatsky and B. L. Altshuler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1678 (1993)

    work page 1993

  51. [51]

    Meier and D

    F. Meier and D. Loss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 167204 (2003)

    work page 2003

  52. [52]

    Nakata, K

    K. Nakata, K. A. van Hoogdalem, P. Simon, and D. Loss, Phys. Rev. B 90, 144419 (2014)

    work page 2014

  53. [53]

    Nakata, P

    K. Nakata, P. Simon, and D. Loss, Phys. Rev. B 92, 014422 (2015)

    work page 2015

  54. [54]

    Ericsson and E

    M. Ericsson and E. Sj¨ oqvist, Phys. Rev. A 65, 013607 (2001)

    work page 2001

  55. [55]

    Liu and G

    T. Liu and G. Vignale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 247203 (2011)

    work page 2011

  56. [56]

    Liu and G

    T. Liu and G. Vignale, J. Appl. Phys. 111, 083907 (2012)

    work page 2012

  57. [57]

    Zhang, T

    X. Zhang, T. Liu, M. E. Flatte, and H. X. Tang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 037202 (2014)

    work page 2014

  58. [58]

    Aharonov and D

    Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 115, 485 (1959)

    work page 1959

  59. [59]

    D. Loss, P. Goldbart, and A. V. Balatsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1655 (1990)

    work page 1990

  60. [60]

    Loss and P

    D. Loss and P. M. Goldbart, Phys. Rev. B 45, 13544 (1992)

    work page 1992

  61. [61]

    (1)] is invariant under a gauge transformation [9] and the gauge invariance is specific to only magnons, i.e

    The force acting on magnons in the dc electric field [Eq. (1)] is invariant under a gauge transformation [9] and the gauge invariance is specific to only magnons, i.e. electrically neutral particles

    work page

  62. [62]

    The magnon gap due to the easy-axis spin anisotropy amounts to ∆ = 4 meV for [94, 95] Cr 2O3, see Ref. [9] for details of experiment parameter values.Compared with it, the magnetic energy due to the resulting ac magnetic field from the applied laser (i.e., ac electric field),e.g., picosecond laser [96] Ω = O(1) THz, is neg- ligibly small. Furthermore, the m...

    work page

  63. [63]

    (14) in Ref

    See Eq. (14) in Ref. [9] for the details of the Lorentz force [49] for magnons in the AC vector potential

    work page

  64. [64]

    [111] for Z2 topological invariant of a general magnon spin Hall system

    See Ref. [111] for Z2 topological invariant of a general magnon spin Hall system

    work page

  65. [65]

    P. M. Perez-Piskunow, G. Usaj, C. A. Balseiro, and L. E. F. F. Torres, Phys. Rev. B 89, 121401(R) (2014)

    work page 2014

  66. [66]

    G. Usaj, P. M. Perez-Piskunow, L. E. F. F. Torres, and C. A. Balseiro, Phys. Rev. B 90, 115423 (2014)

    work page 2014

  67. [67]

    C. Du, T. V. der Sar, T. X. Zhou, P. Upadhyaya, F. Casola, H. Zhang, M. C. Onbasli, C. A. Ross, R. L. Walsworth, Y. Tserkovnyak, et al., Science 357, 195 (2017)

    work page 2017

  68. [68]

    B. Xu, T. Ohtsuki, and R. Shindou, Phys. Rev. B 94, 220403(R) (2016)

    work page 2016

  69. [69]

    K. A. van Hoogdalem, Y. Tserkovnyak, and D. Loss, Phys. Rev. B 87, 024402 (2013)

    work page 2013

  70. [70]

    Franz and G

    R. Franz and G. Wiedemann, Annalen der Physik 165, 497 (1853)

    work page

  71. [71]

    Onose, T

    Y. Onose, T. Ideue, H. Katsura, Y. Shiomi, N. Nagaosa, and Y. Tokura, Science 329, 297 (2010)

    work page 2010

  72. [72]

    L. J. Cornelissen, J. Shan, and B. J. van Wees, Phys. Rev. B 94, 180402(R) (2016)

    work page 2016

  73. [73]

    Johnson and R

    M. Johnson and R. H. Silsbee, Phys. Rev. B 35, 4959 (1987)

    work page 1987

  74. [74]

    Basso, E

    V. Basso, E. Ferraro, A. Magni, A. Sola, M. Kuepferling, and M. Pasquale, Phys. Rev. B 93, 184421 (2016)

    work page 2016

  75. [75]

    Basso, E

    V. Basso, E. Ferraro, and M. Piazzi, Phys. Rev. B 94, 144422 (2016)

    work page 2016

  76. [76]

    Basso, E

    V. Basso, E. Ferraro, and M. Piazzi, Phys. Rev. B 94, 179907 (2016)

    work page 2016

  77. [77]

    L. J. Cornelissen, K. J. H. Peters, G. E. W. Bauer, R. A. Duine, and B. J. van Wees, Phys. Rev. B 94, 014412 (2016)

    work page 2016

  78. [78]

    Saitoh, M

    E. Saitoh, M. Ueda, H. Miyajima, and G. Tatara, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 182509 (2006)

    work page 2006

  79. [79]

    Kajiwara, K

    Y. Kajiwara, K. Harii, S. Takahashi, J. Ohe, K. Uchida, M. Mizuguchi, H. Umezawa, H. Kawai, K. Ando, K. Takanashi, et al., Nature 464, 262 (2010)

    work page 2010

  80. [80]

    Uchida, J

    K. Uchida, J. Xiao, H. Adachi, J. Ohe, S. Takahashi, J. Ieda, T. Ota, Y. Kajiwara, H. Umezawa, H. Kawai, et al., Nat. Mater. 9, 894 (2010)

    work page 2010

Showing first 80 references.