REVIEW 2 cited by
Curriculum based Dropout Discriminator for Domain Adaptation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Domain adaptation is essential to enable wide usage of deep learning based networks trained using large labeled datasets. Adversarial learning based techniques have shown their utility towards solving this problem using a discriminator that ensures source and target distributions are close. However, here we suggest that rather than using a point estimate, it would be useful if a distribution based discriminator could be used to bridge this gap. This could be achieved using multiple classifiers or using traditional ensemble methods. In contrast, we suggest that a Monte Carlo dropout based ensemble discriminator could suffice to obtain the distribution based discriminator. Specifically, we propose a curriculum based dropout discriminator that gradually increases the variance of the sample based distribution and the corresponding reverse gradients are used to align the source and target feature representations. The detailed results and thorough ablation analysis show that our model outperforms state-of-the-art results.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
U-CAM: Visual Explanation using Uncertainty based Class Activation Maps
U-CAM uses gradients of aleatoric and predictive uncertainty losses to sharpen visual attention maps and improve VQA accuracy over standard baselines.
-
CLPSTNet: A Progressive Multi-Scale Convolutional Steganography Model Integrating Curriculum Learning
A progressive multi-scale convolutional block with growing dilation rates, placed in an encoder-decoder-critic steganography network, is claimed to improve image quality metrics; no steganalysis scores are reported.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.