Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Generalized KS transformations, $ND$ singular oscillator and generalized MICZ-Kepler system

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A generalized Kustaanheimo-Stiefel transformation makes the $N=2n$-dimensional singular oscillator and the $(n+1)$-dimensional generalized MICZ-Kepler system dual in every such dimension, with exact spectra and a quadratic Hahn hidden…

desk verdict The paper's central generalization of the KS duality to arbitrary n is unsupported—the required Clifford matrices do not exist for n=3, and Section 3's block form is even inconsistent with the known n=4 case—so the believable content is confined to the n=1,2,4,8 cases where most results are known. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03572 v1 pith:NF2EYZBG submitted 2019-08-09 math-ph math.MPquant-ph

A. Lavrenov This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.MPquant-ph MSC 81Q0581R0533C45
keywords generalizedKustaanheimo-StiefeltransformationsingularoscillatorMICZ-KeplersystemquadraticHahnalgebraHiggsHowedualityquasi-exactlysolvablemodelshiddensymmetry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper's central claim is an all-dimensions version of the classic oscillator–Kepler duality: the $N=2n$-dimensional singular oscillator and the $(n+1)$-dimensional generalized MICZ-Kepler system are dual partners, connected by the generalized Kustaanheimo-Stiefel (KS) transformation. It shows that both Hamiltonians separate in double, spherical, and parabolic coordinates, derives their exact discrete spectra, and identifies the hidden symmetry as the quadratic Hahn algebra $QH(3)$, equivalently a Higgs algebra realized as a commutant in $U(2n)$ through Howe duality. It then extends the scheme to four quasi-exactly solvable families with anisotropic and nonlinear anharmonic terms. A reader should care because the mechanism is uniform: the same transformation and the same hidden algebra organize an entire ladder of dual quantum models in arbitrary even dimension.

What carries the argument

The central object is the generalized Kustaanheimo-Stiefel transformation: real symmetric $2n\times 2n$ matrices $\Gamma_\lambda$ ($\lambda=1,\dots,n+1$) with zero trace and anticommutation relations $\Gamma_\lambda\Gamma_\mu+\Gamma_\mu\Gamma_\lambda=2\delta_{\lambda\mu}I$; these define quadratic coordinates $x_\lambda=(\Gamma_\lambda)_{st}u_su_t$ such that $x_\lambda x_\lambda=(u_su_s)^2$ and $r=u_su_s$. The paper combines this map with the addition rule for two metaplectic representations of $SU(1,1)$: splitting the $2n$ oscillator modes into two $n$-mode sets produces integrals $K_1,K_2$ whose commutation relations are the quadratic Hahn algebra $QH(3)$. The same operators appear as commutants of $O(n)\oplus O(n)$ in $U(2n)$, which yields the Higgs algebra and connects the construction to Howe duality.

What would settle it

A concrete existence check would settle the generality claim: for each $n=3,5,6,7,\ldots$, determine whether real symmetric $n\times n$ matrices $\gamma_\lambda$ ($\lambda=1,\ldots,n$) can satisfy $\gamma_\lambda\gamma_\mu+\gamma_\mu\gamma_\lambda=2\delta_{\lambda\mu}I$; if even one of these block systems fails, the block form of the KS map used in the paper does not exist in that dimension and the dual spectra for that $n$ are not established.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that the $N=2n$-dimensional singular oscillator and the $(n+1)$-dimensional generalized MICZ-Kepler system are dual, with the duality carried by the generalized KS map $x_\lambda=(\Gamma_\lambda)_{st}u_su_t$ and the identity $x_\lambda x_\lambda=(u_su_s)^2$. Under this map the oscillator eigenvalue $Z$ becomes the Coulomb charge in the Kepler Hamiltonian, while the oscillator frequency fixes the Kepler energy through $E=-\omega^2/8$. The Schr\"odinger equations separate in double, spherical, and parabolic coordinates, giving the discrete spectra (24) for the oscillator and (30)/(36) for the MICZ-Kepler system, with angular-momentum-like quantum numbers shifted by the noncentral coupling constants. The same quadratic Hahn algebra $QH(3)$ appears as hidden symmetry under every decomposition of $\mathbb{R}^{2n}$ into two components, and the Higgs-algebra form is recovered as the commutant of $O(n)\oplus O(n)$ in the universal algebra of $U(2n)$, in the sense of Howe duality.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the generalized KS transformation exists for every $n$; the paper cites a construction only for $n=2^h$ and gives no proof for arbitrary $n$, so if the required real symmetric anticommuting matrices $\Gamma_\lambda$ fail for some intermediate dimension, the claimed duality and spectra do not follow in that dimension.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The exact energy formulas for the double singular oscillator (24) and for the generalized MICZ-Kepler system (30)/(36) hold in every dimension $N=2n$ where the generalized KS matrices exist, extending the familiar low-dimensional cases.
  • Separation of variables yields complete sets of exact wavefunctions in double, spherical, and parabolic coordinates, and the overlaps between spherical and parabolic bases are $SU(1,1)$ Clebsch-Gordan coefficients expressed by Hahn polynomials.
  • The hidden symmetry algebra is the quadratic Hahn algebra $QH(3)$ regardless of how $\mathbb{R}^{2n}$ is decomposed into two $n$-dimensional components; the Higgs form follows as a commutant via Howe duality.
  • A dimensional reduction produces a two-dimensional singular oscillator whose two radial coordinates are the $n$-dimensional hyperradii, with Hahn-algebra integrals of motion.
  • Four quasi-exactly solvable generalizations—anisotropic oscillators with $1/r$, $\sqrt{r}$, $r^4$, and $r^6$ anharmonic terms—remain solvable on the MICZ-Kepler side in parabolic coordinates.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the stability of $QH(3)$ under different decompositions suggests that splitting $\mathbb{R}^{2n}$ into more than two oscillator blocks would generate higher-rank Hahn or Racah hidden algebras; the paper does not pursue that step.
  • Editorial inference: because the KS map sends $u_iu_i$ and $v_iv_i$ to the two parabolic variables $u,v$, any perturbation that separates into functions of these two norms will inherit quasi-exact solvability, so the four QES models are examples of a broader family.
  • Editorial inference: if the required Clifford-like block matrices exist only for $n=2^h$, the duality might still be realized by non-block generalized KS maps in other dimensions, but then the block-based derivation of the hidden symmetry would need to be redone.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper claims a duality between an N=2n dimensional double singular oscillator and an (n+1)-dimensional generalized MICZ-Kepler system, mediated by generalized Kustaanheimo-Stiefel transformations for arbitrary n. It derives exact separated solutions in double, spherical, and parabolic coordinates, identifies hidden symmetry algebras (QH(3), and Higgs/Hahn algebras via SU(1,1) addition and Howe duality), performs a dimensional reduction to a two-dimensional singular oscillator, and extends the discussion to quasi-exactly solvable models. The central mathematical object is an (n+1)-tuple of real symmetric N×N matrices satisfying the anticommutation relations in Eq. (3), with N=2n.

Significance. If the results held for all n, the paper would provide a unified treatment of oscillator/Kepler dualities in arbitrary dimensions, with explicit spectra and hidden symmetry algebras, extending the known cases n=2,4,8 from Hopf fibrations and the n=2^h cases of Ref. [33]. The algebraic machinery in Sections 4 and 5—the QH(3)/Higgs algebra identifications and the SU(1,1) addition/Howe duality computations—is largely standard and could be useful when restricted to the dimensions in which the KS construction exists. However, the unrestricted claim for arbitrary n is not supported by the cited work and is false for n=3, and the spectrum in Eq. (30) does not reduce correctly to the Coulomb spectrum in the λ1=λ2=0 limit.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2, Eq. (3); Section 3, Eq. (13); Introduction] The paper assumes that real symmetric 2n×2n matrices Γλ satisfying ΓλΓμ+ΓμΓλ=2δλμI exist for every n. The only construction cited, the Proposition from Ref. [33], is explicitly restricted to n=2^h (h=0,1,2,...), and the Introduction answers 'the answer is YES' for the general case without proof. This is not a minor gap: for n=3, Eq. (3) would require four anticommuting real symmetric 6×6 involutions, i.e., a six-dimensional real representation of Cl_{4,0}≅M_2(H). The irreducible real modules of M_2(H) have real dimension 8, so no such 6-dimensional representation exists. Consequently the block form in Eq. (13) and all subsequent dual-model, spectral, and symmetry claims in Sections 3–7 inherit an unsupported and, for general n, false existence step. The paper must either prove existence for all n, restrict all claims to n=2^h, or substantially revise the central assertion.
  2. [Section 3.2, Eq. (30); Section 3.3, Eq. (36)] In the limit λ1=λ2=0, Eq. (25) is the ordinary Coulomb problem in n+1 dimensions and Eq. (27) is its standard radial equation with Λ=λ(λ+n-1). The standard bound-state spectrum is E=-Z²/[2(n_r+λ+n/2)²]. With J'=L'=L in that limit and using the angular quantum number λ=n_θ+L for the separated solutions of Eqs. (28)–(29), Eq. (30) gives E=-Z²/[2(n_r+n_θ+n+L)²], which is too large by n/2. The same discrepancy appears in the parabolic-coordinate formula Eq. (36). This is a quantitative error in the central spectral claim, not a reparametrization issue.
  3. [Section 3.2, Eq. (30)] The symbol Q is never defined in the manuscript, although it appears in the principal quantum number k=n_r+n_θ+(J'+L'-Q)/2 and in the denominator k+n+Q/2. If Q is a monopole charge or another quantum number, its definition and quantization condition must be stated. As written, the two Q terms cancel, so the displayed spectrum is independent of Q, which is inconsistent with the surrounding claim that the formula 'coincides with [27] in appearance only' and requires a nontrivial identification of quantum numbers.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Title and Abstract] The title uses 'ND singular oscillator' instead of 'N-dimensional singular oscillator', and the abstract contains several typos ('quasy-exactly', 'discused', 'Schr¨odinger'); the manuscript needs careful proofreading.
  2. [Eq. (17)] There is an unbalanced parenthesis in Eq. (17): the displayed Hamiltonian has an extra closing parenthesis after the second noncentral term.
  3. [Eqs. (30) and (36)] The quantum numbers n_r, n_θ, n_1, and n_2 are not defined before they are used. Their definitions and allowed ranges should be stated explicitly.
  4. [Section 3.2, after Eq. (30)] The sentence 'coincides with [27] in appearance only' should be expanded: the reader needs to see exactly which quantum numbers are being relabelled and how the λ1=λ2=0 limit is recovered.
  5. [Section 3, after Eq. (13)] The text says the off-diagonal blocks γλ must be anticommuting n×n matrices with γλ²=I, but for a real symmetric Γλ the general block form is [[0,γλ],[γλ^T,0]]. The paper should state explicitly whether γλ is assumed symmetric, since the stronger condition is not forced by the symmetry of Γλ.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the central spectra and algebra claims are computed from standard input; the only self-citation is a peripheral negative result.

  1. other [Section 7, QES class, after Eq. (62)]
    "However, the analysis performed in [45] showed the absence of new solvable models for the dual partner or the general MICZ-Kepler system in this generalization for the spherical coordinates. Therefore, it is not considered further and the solvability of the Schr¨ odinger equation of the MICZ-Kepler problems by the variables separation method will be discussed only in QES class for parabolic coordinates."

    This is the only self-citation in the paper: [45] is the author's companion work. It is used to support a negative statement that spherical-coordinate QES dual partners have no new solvable models, and thus to restrict the QES analysis to parabolic coordinates. It is not a circular reduction of a prediction to an input: the exact spectra in Sections 3 and the QH(3)/Higgs algebra derivations do not depend on [45]. It is counted only as a minor, non-load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The paper's claimed derivation chain is not circular. The duality is assembled by applying the external generalized KS transformation of [33] to a double singular oscillator; the transformed potential gives the generalized MICZ-Kepler Hamiltonian (17), and the energies (23), (30), and (36) come from solving the separated equations with standard confluent hypergeometric functions. No parameter is fitted and then renamed as a prediction. The QH(3) and Higgs/Hahn algebra identifications are imported from external algebraic works ([34], [37]) or obtained by explicit commutator calculations in Section 5. The only self-citation is [45], used in Section 7 to state that the spherical-coordinate QES dual partner has no new solvable models; this only narrows the QES discussion to parabolic coordinates and is not load-bearing for the central duality or exact spectra. The unsupported extension of the Gamma-lambda-existence proposition from n=2^h to arbitrary n is a serious correctness risk, not a circular step: it is an unproved premise about the Clifford-like matrices (3), and for n=3 the required real representation does not exist, but the subsequent algebra does not assume the conclusion it is meant to prove.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the unproven existence of generalized KS transformations for all n, plus standard results on Hahn/Higgs algebras and QES potentials borrowed from the literature. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • c1, c2 (or λ1, λ2) = arbitrary nonnegative constants
    Introduced in Eq. (15) to define the double singular oscillator and the dual noncentral MICZ-Kepler terms (Eq. 17); they are model parameters, not fitted to data.
  • QES parameters a_i, b_i, c_i = not specified in the paper
    Taken from Turbiner's QES potentials (Eqs. 54 and 56) and used in the four models (63)-(66); chosen by hand to ensure quasi-exact solvability.
assumptions (5)
  • ad hoc to paper Existence of generalized KS transformation for arbitrary n
    The paper assumes real symmetric matrices Γλ satisfying the Clifford relations in Eqs. (2)-(3) for every n, but the only cited construction [33] proves this for n=2^h. No proof is given.
  • domain assumption The KS transformation maps oscillator solutions to Kepler-type solutions
    Taken from Ref. [33]; the paper relies on this mapping to identify the dual Hamiltonian in Eq. (17).
  • standard math Hahn algebra QH(3) and its isomorphism with Higgs algebra
    Commutator relations (9)-(12) are taken from Refs. [34] and [37] and used to identify the hidden symmetry.
  • standard math QES solutions of one-dimensional potentials (54) and (56)
    The eigenfunctions (55) and (57) are cited from Ref. [42] and used to build the four QES models in Section 7.
  • standard math Howe duality pairing between SU(1,1) and U(2n)
    Used in Section 5.1 to connect the Hahn algebra commutant with the SU(1,1) addition rule, following Refs. [40], [41].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Generalized KS transformations, $ND$ singular oscillator and generalized MICZ-Kepler system." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NF2EYZBG

@misc{pith2026190803572,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Generalized KS transformations, $ND$ singular oscillator and generalized MICZ-Kepler system},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NF2EYZBG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03572}
}
abstract

The description of number of dual (quasy)-exactly solvable models with its hidden symmetry algebra has been given at different levels of analysis within the framework of generalized Kustaanheimo-Stiefel (KS)-transformations. It's shown that N-dimensionall singular oscillator and (n+1)-dimensional generalized MICZ-Kepler system are dual to each other and the duality transformation is the generalized version of the KS transformation. The solvability of the Schrodinger equation of these problems by the variables separation method is given in a double, spherical and parabolic coordinates. The quadratic Hahn algebra QH(3) as a hidden symmetry remains unchanged with different decomposition of the original real space ${\rm I \!R}^{N}$ into components in the framework of addition rule for SU(1,1) algebra. Also the hidden symmetry algebra as Higgs/Hahn algebras is clearly shown by the commutant approach in the sense of Howe duality. A dimensional reduction is carried out to a singular oscillator of two dimensions where every variable is the n-dimensional hyper-radius r. The dual connection with (N=2n)-dimensional singular oscillator and the (n+1) general MICZ-Kepler system in the class of quasi-exact (QE) problems also are considered. The certain generalization both of harmonic oscillator model by anisotropic and nonlinear inharmonic terms and its dual analog is shown and analyzed in the framework of generalized KS transformations. The exact analytical solutions of the Schrodinger equation for abovementioned problems for QE class are discused and given for four series of dual quasi-exact solvable models. In particular, a comparison with similar results in lower dimensions and its generalization are given.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Generalized MICZ-Kepler systems on three-dimensional sphere and hyperboloid

    math-ph 2026-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Curved-space analogs of the generalized MICZ-Kepler system on S³ and the 3D hyperboloid are solved exactly, with two-quantum-number spectra and normalized wavefunctions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [33]

    and Komarov L I 1993 Phys

    Le V.-H. and Komarov L I 1993 Phys. Lett. A , 177, 121

    work page 1993

  2. [27]

    Nguyen T.-S., Le D.-N., Thoi T.-Q. N. and Le V.-H. 2015 J. Math. Phys. , 56, no. 5, 052103

    work page 2015

  3. [1]

    Kustaanheimo, Stiefel E 1965 J.Reine Angew.Math., 218, 204 -219

    work page 1965

  4. [2]

    Bergrnann P, Frishman Y 1965 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. , 6, 1855 - 1856

    work page 1965

  5. [3]

    Boiteux M 1973 J Physica, 65, 381 - 395

    work page 1973

  6. [4]

    Seria phys.-math

    Komarov L I, Romanova T S 1982 Vesti AN BSSR. Seria phys.-math. nauk , 2, 98 -103

    work page 1982

  7. [5]

    Hopf H, ” ¨Uber die Abbildungen der dreidimensionalen Sph¨ are auf die Kugelfl¨ ac he” 1931 Mathematische Annalen (Berlin: Springer) , 104, 637665

    work page 1931

  8. [6]

    Nersessian A, Ter-Antonian V and Tsulaia M M 1996 Mod. Phys. Lett. , A11, 1605

    work page 1996

Show all 46 references
  1. [7]

    Bellucci S, Toppan J and Yeghikyan V 2010 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. , 43, 045205

    2010

  2. [8]

    Davtyan L S, Mardoyan L G, Pogosyan G S, Sissakian A N and Ter-A ntonyan V M 1987 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. , 20, 6121

    1987

  3. [9]

    Iwai T and Uwano Y 1986 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. , 27, 1523

    1986

  4. [10]

    Mardoyan L G, Sissakian A N and Ter-Antonyan V M 1996 JINR, Dubna, Preprint E2 , 96, 24

    1996

  5. [11]

    Mardoyan L G, Sissakian A N and Ter-Antonyan V M 1998 Phys. Atom. Nucl. , 61, 1746

    1998

  6. [12]

    Mardoyan L G, Sissakian A N and Ter-Antonyan V M 1999 Mod. Phys. Lett. A , 14, 1303

    1999

  7. [13]

    Mardoyan L G, Sissakian A N and Ter-Antonyan V M 2000 Theor. Math. Phys. , 123, 451

    2000

  8. [14]

    Atomic Nuclei

    Mardoyan L G 2002 Phys. Atomic Nuclei. , 65, 1096

    2002

  9. [15]

    Mardoyan L G 2003 J. Math. Phys. , 44, 4981

    2003

  10. [16]

    Hidden symmetry of th e Yang-Coulomb monopole, arXiv:quant-ph/0302162

    Mardoyan L 2003 Dyon-oscillator duality. Hidden symmetry of th e Yang-Coulomb monopole, arXiv:quant-ph/0302162

    2003 arXiv

  11. [17]

    Mardoyan L G and Petrosyan M G 2007 Phys. Atom. Nucl. , 70, 572

    2007

  12. [18]

    Marquette I 2012 J. Math. Phys. , 53, 022103

    2012

  13. [19]

    Pletyukhov M V and Tolkochev E M 1999 J. Math. Phys. , 40, 93

    1999

  14. [20]

    Pletyukhov M V and Tolkachev E A 1999 Rep. Math. Phys. , 43, 303

    1999

  15. [21]

    Pletyukhov M V and Tolkachev E A 1999 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. , 32, L249

    1999

  16. [22]

    Pletyukhov M V and Tolkachev E A 2000 J. Math. Phys. , 41, 187

    2000

  17. [23]

    and Phan N.-H

    Le V.-H., Nguyen T.-S. and Phan N.-H. 2009 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. , 42, 175204 Generalized KS transformations,ND singular oscillator and generalized MICZ-Kepler system 21

    2009

  18. [24]

    and Nguyen T.-S

    Le V.-H. and Nguyen T.-S. 2011 J. Math. Phys. , 52, 032105

    2011

  19. [25]

    and Phan T.-T

    Le V.-H., Truong C.-T. and Phan T.-T. 2011 J. Math. Phys. , 52 (7) , 072101

    2011

  20. [26]

    and Le V.-H

    Phan N.-H. and Le V.-H. 2012 Journal of Mathematical Physics , 53 (8) , 082103

    2012

  21. [28]

    Phan N.-H., Le D.-N., Thoi T.-Q. N. and Le V.-H. 2018 J. Math. Phys. 59, no. 3, 032102

    2018

  22. [29]

    Komarov L I, Romanova T S, and Chan Za An 1987 Vestsi Akad. Navuk B. SSR, Ser. Fiz. Mat. Navuk., No. 1, 90

    1987

  23. [30]

    Fiz., 54, 962

    Pris’ I E and Tolkachev E A 1991 Yad. Fiz., 54, 962

    1991

  24. [31]

    Jaroszkiewicz G A and McHale G 1987 Ann. Phys. (N. Y.) , 175, 267

    1987

  25. [32]

    Cordani B 1989 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. , 22, 2441

    1989

  26. [34]

    Zhedanov A S 1993 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. , 26, 46334641

    1993

  27. [35]

    Higgs P W 1979 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. , 12, no. 4, 309-323

    1979

  28. [36]

    Leemon H I 1979 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 12, no. 4, 489501

    1979

  29. [37]

    Frappat L, Gaboriaud J, Vinet L, Vinet S and Zhedanov A S 2018 T he Higgs and Hahn algebras from a Howe duality perspective arXiv:1811.09359 [math-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Gaboriaud J, Vinet L, Vinet S and Zhedanov A S 2018 The generaliz ed Racah algebra as a commutant arXiv:1808.09518 [math-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Gaboriaud J, Vinet L, Vinet S and Zhedanov A S 2018 The Racah alg ebra as a commutant and Howe duality arXiv:1808.05261 [math-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Howe R 1989 Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , 313(2), 539-570

    1989

  33. [41]

    Rowe D J, Carvalho M J and Repka J 2012 Reviews of Modern Physics, , 84(2), 711757

    2012

  34. [42]

    Turbiner A V 1988 Funct. Anal. Appl. 22, 163

    1988

  35. [43]

    Turbiner A V 1994 Phys. Rev. A , 50, 5335

    1994

  36. [44]

    Turbiner A V and Escobar-Ruiz M A 2013 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. , 46, 295204

    2013

  37. [45]

    Lavrenov A and Lavrenov I 2019 16 D anisotropic inharmonic oscillator and 9 D related (MICZ-) Kepler-like systems arXiv:1903.10847 [math-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Nersessian A and Yeghikyan V 2008 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. , 41, 155203

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.