Momentum space approach to crossing symmetric CFT correlators II: General spacetime dimension

Gary Shiu; Hiroshi Isono; Toshifumi Noumi

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Momentum space approach to crossing symmetric CFT correlators II: General spacetime dimension

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper constructs a manifestly crossing-symmetric basis for scalar conformal four-point functions in arbitrary spacetime dimension, extending the earlier three-dimensional construction to general dimension.

desk verdict A genuine general-dimensional extension of momentum-space Polyakov blocks with explicit spinning formulas, but the load-bearing factorization is only cited from prior work and one equation has a z^s typo that needs fixing. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.04572 v1 pith:K6NLJORO submitted 2019-08-13 hep-th cond-mat.stat-mechmath-phmath.MP

Hiroshi Isono , Toshifumi Noumi , Gary Shiu This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-thcond-mat.stat-mechmath-phmath.MP

keywords conformalfieldtheorycrossingsymmetryPolyakovblockmomentumspacesphericalharmonicsFunk-HeckeformulaWittenexchangediagrambootstrap

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that the manifestly crossing-symmetric basis for scalar conformal four-point functions, previously available in three spacetime dimensions, can be built in any spacetime dimension $d$. The construction expresses each exchanged primary operator of spin $s$ through a helicity decomposition on the sphere $S^{d-2}$, and uses spherical harmonics to sum over helicities. The result is an explicit $s$-channel Polyakov block, Eq. (4.11): a scalar Witten-exchange integral dressed by differential operators and weighted by Gegenbauer polynomials. If correct, any scalar four-point function in a $d$-dimensional CFT can be expanded as the sum of $s$-, $t$-, and $u$-channel Polyakov blocks plus analytic terms, so crossing symmetry is manifest by construction while the OPE is hidden.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the Funk-Hecke formula on the unit sphere. It states that any scalar function of two unit vectors $\hat w, \hat z$ in $D$ dimensions expands as $f(\hat w\cdot\hat z)=\sum_m \lambda_m \Pi_m(\hat w,\hat z)$, where $\Pi_m(\hat w,\hat z)=\sum_n Y_{mn}(\hat w)Y_{mn}^*(\hat z)=\dim Y_m^D\, P_m^{(D)}(\hat w\cdot\hat z)$ is the projector onto the spin-$m$ sector and $P_m^{(D)}$ is a normalized Gegenbauer polynomial. The paper uses this to decompose symmetric traceless tensor operators into helicity components labeled by the little-group spin $m$ of a fixed momentum, turning the two- and three-point functions into scalar functions on $S^{d-2}$ whose helicity coefficients are extracted by the integral (2.11). The addition theorem then resums the helicity sum in the four-point block, yielding Eq. (4.11).

What would settle it

Evaluate both sides of Eq. (3.29) for a concrete case outside $d=3$, for example $d=4$ with an intermediate spin $s=2$ operator and generic external dimensions; if the discontinuity of the three bulk-to-boundary integral does not factor with the stated prefactor, the cubic vertex (3.31) and the Polyakov block (4.11) fail the defining factorization (4.5). A complementary check is to compute the block (4.11) and verify directly that it has no $t$- or $u$-channel discontinuities.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the Polyakov block for external scalars with an intermediate symmetric traceless operator of arbitrary spin $s$ takes the explicit form in Eq. (4.11): $$$W_O^{{(s)}}$ = \sum_{m=0}^s \dim $Y_m^{{d-1}}$\, (k_2\sin\theta_2\, k_4\sin\theta_4)^m $P_m^{{(d-1)}}$(\hat\kappa_2\cdot\hat\kappa_4)\, $A^{{(m)}}$_{12O}\, \frac{\left($A^{{(m)}}$_{34O}\right)^*}{a_{\nu_O,s}(m)} \int \frac{dz_1}{$z_1^{{d+1-s}}$} \int \frac{dz_2}{$z_2^{{d+1-s}}$} B_{\nu_1}B_{\nu_2}G_{\nu_O}B_{\nu_3}B_{\nu_4},$$ where $P_m^{(d-1)}$ is a normalized Gegenbauer polynomial, $A^{(m)}_{12O}$ are differential operators built from cubic-vertex data, $G_{\nu_O}$ is the scalar bulk-to-bulk propagator, and the integral is the scalar Witten exchange. The block is constructed to satisfy the factorization criterion (4.5) and to have no non-analyticity beyond the $s$-channel cut. The paper further claims that summing over intermediate operators in all channels gives a basis of the form (4.4), so crossing symmetry is automatic.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a specific identity about how a three-point momentum-space integral behaves at its branch cut holds in every dimension, not just $d=3$; if that identity fails, the cubic vertex and the explicit Polyakov block are not justified.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Any scalar CFT four-point function in general dimension admits a crossing-symmetric expansion as a sum of $s$, $t$, and $u$ Polyakov blocks plus analytic terms, so crossing symmetry is manifest by construction.
Each Polyakov block is the momentum-space avatar of a Witten exchange diagram, so in holographic theories the basis organizes the correlator into bulk exchanges with analytic terms playing the role of contact interactions.
Because the expansion hides the OPE, demanding consistency with the OPE constrains the analytic terms and the spectrum; this is a concrete bootstrap condition in general $d$.
The same spherical-harmonic technology is pointed to as the route to four-point functions involving external conserved currents and the stress tensor, with no conceptual obstruction expected.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A purely momentum-space bootstrap program could be built on this basis: treat the undetermined analytic terms as free parameters and fix them by OPE consistency or dispersion relations.
The explicit spin dependence in Eq. (4.11) makes it possible to test the basis in weakly coupled large-$N$ theories by checking whether the summed blocks reproduce tree-level Witten diagrams to all spins; this would be a numerical check the paper does not perform.
The same helicity/Funk-Hecke decomposition should extend to de Sitter and inflationary correlators, where a crossing-symmetric basis might simplify the study of non-Gaussianities; the paper lists this as a direction but does not develop it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper generalizes the authors' d=3 momentum-space Polyakov block construction to arbitrary spacetime dimension. The new ingredient is the use of Funk-Hecke / spherical harmonic decomposition on the little group S^{d-2} to handle symmetric traceless operators of arbitrary spin. That part is worked out cleanly: the two-point helicity coefficients (3.14) and three-point vertex (3.26) are derived in appendices and are checkable. If you work on conformal bootstrap or cosmological correlators in momentum space, this is a useful technical tool.

The main result, Eq. (4.11), gives an explicit s-channel Polyakov block for scalar four-point functions with an intermediate spin-s operator. It has the correct structure: two differential operators A(m) act on a scalar Witten exchange diagram, and the addition theorem sums the helicity indices. The logic is sound.

The soft spots are real but fixable. First, the central factorization of the three-point discontinuity, Eq. (3.29), is load-bearing; it is simply cited to Ref. [1] ("see Sec. 3 of Ref. [1] for details"). In a paper whose whole point is extending to general d, the dimension-dependence of that discontinuity is exactly what must be shown. It probably carries over, but as written the reader cannot verify it without going to the previous paper and doing the matching. Second, and more concrete: Eq. (3.31), the cubic vertex, omits the z^s factor that appears in (3.29) and is needed to match the measure z^{d+1-s} in (4.9)/(4.11). As printed, (3.31) and (4.9) are mutually inconsistent. That looks like a typo, but it sits in the central derivation and a reader who tries to reproduce the factorization from (3.31) will fail. Third, the claim that the differential operators A(m) do not change non-analytic properties is asserted rather than proved; this is the step that guarantees the block has only the s-channel discontinuity. Probably true, but it deserves a few sentences.

None of this shakes the central construction. The paper is a genuine extension, not a repackaging. It deserves a serious referee: the referee should ask for the missing derivation of (3.29), the z^s fix, and a more careful run-through of the analyticity argument. After those revisions it will be a solid reference.

I'd bring it to the reading group if anyone cares about momentum-space bootstrap; otherwise a skim suffices. I'd accept it for review.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper extends the authors' earlier d=3 construction of a manifestly crossing-symmetric basis for scalar CFT four-point functions to general spacetime dimension d. The technical novelty is a helicity decomposition of symmetric traceless operators using spherical harmonics on S^{d-2}, which replaces the Fourier expansion used in the d=3 paper. After reviewing the Funk-Hecke formula and its derivation, the paper writes momentum-space two- and three-point functions in helicity form (Sections 3.1-3.3), derives explicit integral expressions in Appendices A and B, and then uses the factorization of three-point discontinuities (Section 3.4) to define cubic vertices. These vertices are assembled into the s-channel Polyakov block in Section 4, with the final general-spin formula given by Eq. (4.11); t- and u-channel blocks are defined analogously. The paper has no fitted parameters and the main formulas are explicit and checkable.

Significance. If the construction is correct, it provides a manifestly crossing-symmetric basis of scalar four-point functions in arbitrary dimension, with Polyakov blocks built from scalar Witten-exchange integrals dressed by explicit differential operators. This would be a useful technical tool for conformal bootstrap and holographic applications, and it generalizes a nontrivial result from d=3 to general d. The paper is commendably explicit in Sections 2-3: the spherical-harmonic formalism, the two-point coefficient (3.14), and the three-point helicity amplitude (3.26) are derived in detail, with the integral identities proven in Appendices A and B. However, the load-bearing factorization identity (3.29) is imported from the d=3 paper rather than derived, and there is a z^s mismatch between (3.31) and (4.9) as printed. These issues affect the central claim and require repair before the construction can be considered established.

major comments (3)

[§3.4, Eq. (3.29)] The general-dimensional factorization of the three-point discontinuity is stated with the justification 'see Sec. 3 of Ref. [1] for details,' but Ref. [1] treats d=3. This identity is load-bearing: it defines the cubic vertex (3.31) and, through (4.2) and (4.5), fixes the s-channel Polyakov block (4.9)/(4.11). If the relative coefficients, the k3^{-ν3} Iν3 kernel, or the z^s weight differ for general d, the block will not reproduce the required s-channel discontinuity and the claimed crossing-symmetric basis is not established. Please supply a derivation of (3.29) in general dimension, or a precise statement of which theorem in Ref. [1] already covers general d.
[Eqs. (3.31) and (4.9)] As printed, the cubic vertex in Eq. (3.31) omits the z^s factor that appears in the factorization (3.29) and that is needed to match the measure z1^{-(d+1-s)} z2^{-(d+1-s)} in Eq. (4.9). With (3.31) taken literally, the s-channel block constructed in (4.9) has the wrong weight in the radial coordinates and does not reproduce the discontinuity (3.29). This is not a mere typo in an auxiliary formula; it is an inconsistency between two formulas that must be consistent for the construction to work. Please correct (3.31) and verify the overall power counting in z in (4.9).
[§4.2, Eqs. (4.8)-(4.9)] The assertion that the differential operators A^{(m)}_{12O} and their conjugates 'do not change the non-analytic properties' is not demonstrated. The argument in Section 3.4 establishes only that k3 D12O is polynomial in the momenta and that the prefactors in (3.27) are polynomial in k2 and cosθ; it does not show that A^{(m)} commutes with the discontinuity in k12^2, nor that applying the operator to the scalar Witten exchange does not introduce t- or u-channel discontinuities. These properties are precisely property 2 of the Polyakov block in (4.5), so this gap affects the load-bearing claim that W^{(s)}_O has no non-analyticity other than that required by s-channel factorization. A proof, or a precise reference containing the proof, is required.

minor comments (5)

[Notation, §2] The paper uses d for the spacetime dimension and D for the dimension of the sphere S^{D-1} in Section 2; please clarify this distinction in one place, since D is also used for the differential operator D12O in Section 3.
[Page 1 affiliations] The affiliations contain line-break artifacts: 'Chulalongkorn U niversity', 'Ja pan', and 'M adison' appear in the header; these should be fixed.
[Eq. (2.2)] In Eq. (2.2), SO(2) has an unintended space, and the phases of Y_{m\pm} are not specified; please define them explicitly so that the sign conventions in (2.5) are unambiguous.
[Eqs. (3.29)-(3.33)] The notation Disck2_3 is used for the discontinuity but is not defined; please state explicitly that it denotes the discontinuity across the branch cut in k3^2, and similarly for the s-channel discontinuity in Section 4.
[§5, Conclusion] The statement that there is 'no conceptual obstruction' to generalizing to external conserved currents is stronger than what is demonstrated here; please soften it or cite Ref. [40] more precisely as a first step.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the construction is an explicit ansatz-based derivation with no fitted inputs.

full rationale

The paper does not fit any parameter to data and then rename it as a prediction. Its central object, the s-channel Polyakov block W_O^(s), is constructed from the stated factorization requirement (4.2) and the cubic vertex (3.31), and it is verified by construction to reproduce the required discontinuity through the non-analytic part of the bulk-to-bulk propagator (4.7). The expansion (1.1) is explicitly labeled Polyakov's ansatz, and the factorization property (3.29) is imported from the authors' previous work [1]; although this is a self-citation, it is a mathematical identity that can be independently verified and is not defined in terms of the target block. The reliance on [1] for the factorization and for the helicity-independent three-point function is a correctness dependency, not a circular reduction: no central formula is equivalent to its own input by construction. The apparent inconsistency between the z^s factor in (3.29)/(4.9) and its omission in (3.31) is a consistency concern rather than circularity. Overall the derivation is self-contained in the sense that the block is built explicitly from the stated ingredients and no 'prediction' secretly coincides with a fitted quantity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on Polyakov's ansatz, the factorization of three-point discontinuities imported from the authors' prior work, the standard Funk-Hecke machinery, and the asserted uniqueness criteria of the block construction. No free parameters are fitted and no new entities are postulated.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The Polyakov ansatz: any scalar four-point function admits an expansion into s, t, u Polyakov blocks plus analytic terms (Eq. 1.1).
This is the founding assumption of Polyakov's crossing-symmetric basis [2], adopted without proof. The paper builds on it.
domain assumption The non-analytic part of the three-point function factorizes as in Eq. (3.29), with the same form in general dimension as in d=3.
Quoted from the authors' prior work [1], Section 3.4: 'see Sec. 3 of Ref. [1] for details'. If this factorization fails for general d, the cubic vertex (3.31) and the Polyakov block (4.9) are not defined as stated.
standard math The Funk-Hecke formula and addition theorem for spherical harmonics on S^{d-2}, with the O(d-1) little group decomposition of helicity operators.
Section 2, standard mathematical background; cited to references [6-8].
domain assumption The criteria defining the Polyakov block (factorization in one channel, analyticity elsewhere) determine the block up to analytic terms.
Section 4.2 states the two criteria and asserts they specify the form up to analytic terms; this uniqueness is not proven but is standard in the bootstrap literature.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Momentum space approach to crossing symmetric CFT correlators II: General spacetime dimension." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/K6NLJORO

@misc{pith2026190804572,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Momentum space approach to crossing symmetric CFT correlators II: General spacetime dimension},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/K6NLJORO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.04572}
}

read the original abstract

Our previous work [1] constructed, in three-dimensional momentum space, a manifestly crossing symmetric basis for scalar conformal four-point functions, based on the factorization property proposed by Polyakov. This work extends this construction to general dimensional conformal field theory. To facilitate the treatment of symmetric traceless tensors, we exploit techniques of spherical harmonics in general dimensions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Conformal 3-point functions and the Lorentzian OPE in momentum space
hep-th 2019-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

The paper derives a closed Appell F4 expression for the Wightman 3-point function of scalar operators and for two scalars with one traceless symmetric tensor in Lorentzian momentum space.
EFT Perspective On de-Sitter S-Matrix
hep-th 2026-01 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

In a carefully chosen limit, the de Sitter scattering amplitude is written as an integral transform of the flat-space amplitude, and requiring energy conservation on exceptional de Sitter scalars reproduces DBI and Sp...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

[1]

Isono, T

H. Isono, T. Noumi and G. Shiu, Momentum space approach to crossing symmetric CFT correlators, JHEP 07 (2018) 136 [ 1805.11107]

arXiv 2018
[2]

A. M. Polyakov, Nonhamiltonian approach to conformal quantum ﬁeld theory , Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 66 (1974) 23–42 [Sov. Phys. JETP39, 9 (1974)]

work page 1974
[3]

Gopakumar, A

R. Gopakumar, A. Kaviraj, K. Sen and A. Sinha, Conformal Bootstrap in Mellin Space , Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017), no. 8, 081601 [ 1609.00572]

arXiv 2017
[4]

Gopakumar, A

R. Gopakumar, A. Kaviraj, K. Sen and A. Sinha, A Mellin space approach to the conformal bootstrap, JHEP 05 (2017) 027 [ 1611.08407]

arXiv 2017
[5]

Arkani-Hamed and J

N. Arkani-Hamed and J. Maldacena, Cosmological Collider Physics , 1503.08043

arXiv
[6]

Bateman and A

Bateman Manuscript Project, H. Bateman and A. Erd´ elyi, Higher Transcendental Functions Volume II, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. (1953) Chapter XI

work page 1953
[7]

N. Ja. Vilenkin, Special Functions and the Theory of Group Representations , American Mathematical Society (1968)

work page 1968
[8]

Atkinson and W

K. Atkinson and W. Han, Spherical Harmonics and Approximations on the Unit Sphere: An Introduction, Springer (2010). 12 Here we used the fact that any spherical harmonic on the unit s phere SD−1 is the restriction of a harmonic polynomial in RD (i.e. a homogeneous polynomial annihilated by the Laplacia n in RD) to SD−1. The spin of the spherical harmonic ...

work page 2010

Show all 47 references

[9]

Ferrara, A

S. Ferrara, A. F. Grillo, R. Gatto and G. Parisi, Analyticity properties and asymptotic expansions of conformal covariant green’s functions , Nuovo Cim. A19 (1974) 667–695

1974
[10]

G. M. Sotkov and R. P. Zaikov, Conformal Invariant Two Point and Three Point Functions for Fields with Arbitrary Spin , Rept. Math. Phys. 12 (1977) 375

1977
[11]

G. M. Sotkov and R. P. Zaikov, On the Structure of the Conformal Covariant N Point Functions, Rept. Math. Phys. 19 (1984) 335

1984
[12]

Antoniadis, P

I. Antoniadis, P. O. Mazur and E. Mottola, Conformal Invariance, Dark Energy, and CMB Non-Gaussianity, JCAP 1209 (2012) 024 [ 1103.4164]

2012 arXiv
[13]

J. M. Maldacena and G. L. Pimentel, On graviton non-Gaussianities during inﬂation , JHEP 09 (2011) 045 [ 1104.2846]

2011 arXiv
[14]

Coriano, L

C. Coriano, L. Delle Rose and M. Serino, Three and Four Point Functions of Stress Energy Tensors in D=3 for the Analysis of Cosmological Non-Gaussia nities, JHEP 12 (2012) 090 [1210.0136]

2012 arXiv
[15]

Chowdhury, S

D. Chowdhury, S. Raju, S. Sachdev, A. Singh and P. Strack, Multipoint correlators of conformal ﬁeld theories: implications for quantum critica l transport, Phys. Rev. B87 (2013), no. 8, 085138 [ 1210.5247]

2013 arXiv
[16]

Bzowski, P

A. Bzowski, P. McFadden and K. Skenderis, Holography for inﬂation using conformal perturbation theory, JHEP 04 (2013) 047 [ 1211.4550]

2013 arXiv
[17]

I. Mata, S. Raju and S. Trivedi, CMB from CFT , JHEP 07 (2013) 015 [ 1211.5482]

2013 arXiv
[18]

Coriano, L

C. Coriano, L. Delle Rose, E. Mottola and M. Serino, Solving the Conformal Constraints for Scalar Operators in Momentum Space and the Evaluation of Fey nman’s Master Integrals, JHEP 07 (2013) 011 [ 1304.6944]

2013 arXiv
[19]

Bzowski, P

A. Bzowski, P. McFadden and K. Skenderis, Implications of conformal invariance in momentum space, JHEP 03 (2014) 111 [ 1304.7760]

2014 arXiv
[20]

Y. Huh, P. Strack and S. Sachdev, Conserved current correlators of conformal ﬁeld theories in 2+1 dimensions , Phys. Rev. B88 (2013) 155109 [ 1307.6863], [Erratum: Phys. Rev.B90,no.19,199902(2014)]

2013 arXiv
[21]

Ghosh, N

A. Ghosh, N. Kundu, S. Raju and S. P. Trivedi, Conformal Invariance and the Four Point Scalar Correlator in Slow-Roll Inﬂation , JHEP 07 (2014) 011 [ 1401.1426]

2014 arXiv
[22]

Kundu, A

N. Kundu, A. Shukla and S. P. Trivedi, Constraints from Conformal Symmetry on the Three Point Scalar Correlator in Inﬂation , JHEP 04 (2015) 061 [ 1410.2606]

2015 arXiv
[23]

Kundu, A

N. Kundu, A. Shukla and S. P. Trivedi, Ward Identities for Scale and Special Conformal Transformations in Inﬂation , JHEP 01 (2016) 046 [ 1507.06017]

2016 arXiv
[24]

Sen and A

K. Sen and A. Sinha, On critical exponents without Feynman diagrams , J. Phys. A49 (2016), no. 44, 445401 [ 1510.07770]

2016 arXiv
[25]

Bzowski, P

A. Bzowski, P. McFadden and K. Skenderis, Scalar 3-point functions in CFT: renormalisation, beta functions and anomalies , JHEP 03 (2016) 066 [ 1510.08442]

2016 arXiv
[26]

Bzowski, P

A. Bzowski, P. McFadden and K. Skenderis, Evaluation of conformal integrals , JHEP 02 (2016) 068 [ 1511.02357]

2016 arXiv
[27]

V. P. J. Jacobs, P. Betzios, U. Gursoy and H. T. C. Stoof, Electromagnetic response of interacting Weyl semimetals , Phys. Rev. B93 (2016), no. 19, 195104 [ 1512.04883]. – 17 –

2016 arXiv
[28]

R. C. Myers, T. Sierens and W. Witczak-Krempa, A Holographic Model for Quantum Critical Responses, JHEP 05 (2016) 073 [ 1602.05599], [Addendum: JHEP09,066(2016)]

2016 arXiv
[29]

Lucas, S

A. Lucas, S. Gazit, D. Podolsky and W. Witczak-Krempa, Dynamical response near quantum critical points, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017), no. 5, 056601 [ 1608.02586]

2017 arXiv
[30]

Lucas, T

A. Lucas, T. Sierens and W. Witczak-Krempa, Quantum critical response: from conformal perturbation theory to holography , JHEP 07 (2017) 149 [ 1704.05461]

2017 arXiv
[31]

Bzowski, P

A. Bzowski, P. McFadden and K. Skenderis, Renormalised 3-point functions of stress tensors and conserved currents in CFT , JHEP 11 (2018) 153 [ 1711.09105]

2018 arXiv
[32]

Corian` o and M

C. Corian` o and M. M. Maglio, Exact Correlators from Conformal Ward Identities in Momentum Space and the Perturbative T J J Vertex, Nucl. Phys. B938 (2019) 440–522 [1802.07675]

2019 arXiv
[33]

Bzowski, P

A. Bzowski, P. McFadden and K. Skenderis, Renormalised CFT 3-point functions of scalars, currents and stress tensors , JHEP 11 (2018) 159 [ 1805.12100]

2018 arXiv
[34]

Gillioz, Momentum-space conformal blocks on the light cone , JHEP 10 (2018) 125 [1807.07003]

M. Gillioz, Momentum-space conformal blocks on the light cone , JHEP 10 (2018) 125 [1807.07003]

2018 arXiv
[35]

Corian` o and M

C. Corian` o and M. M. Maglio, The general 3-graviton vertex ( T T T) of conformal ﬁeld theories in momentum space in d = 4, Nucl. Phys. B937 (2018) 56–134 [ 1808.10221]

2018 arXiv
[36]

Albayrak and S

S. Albayrak and S. Kharel, Towards the higher point holographic momentum space amplitudes, JHEP 02 (2019) 040 [ 1810.12459]

2019 arXiv
[37]

Arkani-Hamed, D

N. Arkani-Hamed, D. Baumann, H. Lee and G. L. Pimentel, The Cosmological Bootstrap: Inﬂationary Correlators from Symmetries and Singularitie s, 1811.00024

arXiv
[38]

Skvortsov, Light-Front Bootstrap for Chern-Simons Matter Theories , JHEP 06 (2019) 058 [1811.12333]

E. Skvortsov, Light-Front Bootstrap for Chern-Simons Matter Theories , JHEP 06 (2019) 058 [1811.12333]

2019 arXiv
[39]

J. A. Farrow, A. E. Lipstein and P. McFadden, Double copy structure of CFT correlators , JHEP 02 (2019) 130 [ 1812.11129]

2019 arXiv
[40]

Isono, T

H. Isono, T. Noumi and T. Takeuchi, Momentum space conformal three-point functions of conserved currents and a general spinning operator , JHEP 05 (2019) 057 [ 1903.01110]

2019 arXiv
[41]

Corian` o and M

C. Corian` o and M. M. Maglio, On Some Hypergeometric Solutions of the Conformal Ward Identities of Scalar 4-point Functions in Momentum Space , 1903.05047

1903 arXiv
[42]

Sleight, A Mellin Space Approach to Cosmological Correlators , 1906.12302

C. Sleight, A Mellin Space Approach to Cosmological Correlators , 1906.12302

1906 arXiv
[43]

Sleight and M

C. Sleight and M. Taronna, Bootstrapping Inﬂationary Correlators in Mellin Space , 1907.01143

1907 arXiv
[44]

Albayrak and S

S. Albayrak and S. Kharel, Towards the higher point holographic momentum space amplitudes II: Gravitons , 1908.01835

1908 arXiv
[45]

Bargmann and I

V. Bargmann and I. T. Todorov, Spaces of Analytic Functions on a Complex Cone as Carries for the Symmetric Tensor Representations of SO(N) , J. Math. Phys. 18 (1977) 1141–1148

1977
[46]

M. S. Costa, J. Penedones, D. Poland and S. Rychkov, Spinning Conformal Correlators , JHEP 11 (2011) 071 [ 1107.3554]

2011 arXiv
[47]

I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series and Products, Seventh Edition , Elsevier, Academic Press (2007). – 18 –

2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Isono, T

H. Isono, T. Noumi and G. Shiu, Momentum space approach to crossing symmetric CFT correlators, JHEP 07 (2018) 136 [ 1805.11107]

arXiv 2018

[2] [2]

A. M. Polyakov, Nonhamiltonian approach to conformal quantum ﬁeld theory , Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 66 (1974) 23–42 [Sov. Phys. JETP39, 9 (1974)]

work page 1974

[3] [3]

Gopakumar, A

R. Gopakumar, A. Kaviraj, K. Sen and A. Sinha, Conformal Bootstrap in Mellin Space , Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017), no. 8, 081601 [ 1609.00572]

arXiv 2017

[4] [4]

Gopakumar, A

R. Gopakumar, A. Kaviraj, K. Sen and A. Sinha, A Mellin space approach to the conformal bootstrap, JHEP 05 (2017) 027 [ 1611.08407]

arXiv 2017

[5] [5]

Arkani-Hamed and J

N. Arkani-Hamed and J. Maldacena, Cosmological Collider Physics , 1503.08043

arXiv

[6] [6]

Bateman and A

Bateman Manuscript Project, H. Bateman and A. Erd´ elyi, Higher Transcendental Functions Volume II, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. (1953) Chapter XI

work page 1953

[7] [7]

N. Ja. Vilenkin, Special Functions and the Theory of Group Representations , American Mathematical Society (1968)

work page 1968

[8] [8]

Atkinson and W

K. Atkinson and W. Han, Spherical Harmonics and Approximations on the Unit Sphere: An Introduction, Springer (2010). 12 Here we used the fact that any spherical harmonic on the unit s phere SD−1 is the restriction of a harmonic polynomial in RD (i.e. a homogeneous polynomial annihilated by the Laplacia n in RD) to SD−1. The spin of the spherical harmonic ...

work page 2010