Branching random graph model of rough surfaces describes thermal properties of the effective molecular potential

Aleksey Khlyupin; Timur Aslyamov

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 47 references

Branching random graph model of rough surfaces describes thermal properties of the effective molecular potential

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The effective interaction between a fluid molecule and a rough solid surface gains a low-temperature topology term that depends on the hierarchical branching structure of the roughness, not just on local height fluctuations.

desk verdict Nice idea and a plausible-looking final formula, but the paper never actually derives the sparse-coupling model from the branching-tree ensemble it claims to simulate — Eq. (9) has the wrong scaling for tree pairs, so the topology term is, as written, unsupported. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08002 v2 pith:TEN2YC5R submitted 2019-08-21 cond-mat.dis-nn cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.stat-mechmath-phmath.MP

Aleksey Khlyupin , Timur Aslyamov This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.stat-mechmath-phmath.MP

keywords effectivemolecularpotentialroughsurfacesbranchingrandomgraphsfree-energyaveragingreplicamethodultrametriccorrelationsfluid-solidinteractionquencheddisorder

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the temperature dependence of the effective force a fluid molecule feels near a rough solid surface includes a contribution from the hierarchical organization of the roughness, not just from its local fluctuations. The authors encode the surface's island structure as a branching random tree, express the averaged single-molecule free energy as a statistical model of virtual clusters with random ultrametric pair couplings, and derive a closed formula for the effective potential, $U_{\mathrm{eff}}(\beta)=U_0-\beta\sigma^2/2+\frac{\bar{\alpha}}{\beta}\left(\frac{2m_0}{Z_0}e^{-\beta^2\sigma^2/2}-\frac{1}{\beta}\frac{m_0^2}{Z_0^2}e^{-\beta^2\sigma^2}\right)$. The formula adds a 'topology' term to the standard Gaussian free-energy-averaging result. They compare the formula with direct Monte Carlo simulations on random branching graphs and report agreement, including cases where the Gaussian term alone would predict identical behavior for different surface topologies. If the claim holds, the result gives a practical route to low-temperature fluid-solid potentials for rough materials.

What carries the argument

The central object is a branching random tree (BRT) whose vertices are the 'islands' of the rough surface at successive layers, with the field $U_i$ in island $i$ written as a sum of independent random vertex contributions along the unique branch from the root to leaf $i$. Pairwise correlations are then determined by the common path depth $Q_{ij}$, so the effective distances between islands are ultrametric rather than Euclidean. Averaging the free energy with replicas converts the problem into a statistical model of virtual clusters with random pair couplings drawn from a multimodal distribution; finite connectivity forces a replica-symmetric ansatz and a self-consistent equation for the local-field distribution $W(h)$, which is solved numerically by population dynamics. The final effective potential assembles $U_0$, the Gaussian fluctuation term $-\beta\sigma^2/2$, and the topology term built from $W_0(h)$ and the averaged structure parameter $\bar{\alpha}$.

What would settle it

Generate two ensembles of random branching graphs that share the same pair-depth distribution $\rho(Q_{ij})$ but differ in triplet correlations, for example one enforcing the ultrametric inequality $Q_{ij}\ge\min(Q_{ik},Q_{jk})$ and one not, then compute the free energy by direct Monte Carlo at low temperature with fixed field variance and connectivity and compare with $U_{\mathrm{eff}}(\beta)$ from equation (32); if the two ensembles give different free energies while the formula gives the same value, the factorization assumption fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the free-energy-averaged solid-fluid interaction for a single molecule at inverse temperature $\beta$ is $U_{\mathrm{eff}}(\beta)=U_0-\beta\sigma^2/2+\frac{\bar{\alpha}}{\beta}\left(\frac{2m_0}{Z_0}e^{-\beta^2\sigma^2/2}-\frac{1}{\beta}\frac{m_0^2}{Z_0^2}e^{-\beta^2\sigma^2}\right)$, where the first two terms are the standard Gaussian fluctuation result and the last term, the topology term, arises from the branching-random-tree representation of the rough surface. The material-dependent quantity $\bar{\alpha}$ is an average over the graph generation pattern, and $m_0$ is an integral of the replica-symmetric local-field distribution $W_0(h)$ obtained from a self-consistent equation. The paper argues that at low temperature this topology term is substantial and carries the influence of the hierarchical structure of random geometry, and that the predictions coincide with direct Monte Carlo simulations on random branching graphs with different generation patterns. It also demonstrates on a realistic carbon-surface model that deeper slices inside the rough solid have approximately Gaussian energy distributions, while slices near the surface become asymmetric, supporting the model's use of a multivariate Gaussian field deep in the solid.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the common-path depths between different pairs of branches are independent across pairs, so the random couplings become independent and identically distributed; real branching trees impose ultrametric constraints among triplets, and if those constraints matter for rough-surface geometry, the product measure and the resulting topology term lose their justification.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

At low temperatures the effective fluid-solid potential depends on the branching topology of surface roughness, so two surfaces with the same height variance and correlation length can produce different adsorption thermodynamics.
The derived effective potential supplies a temperature-dependent input for density-functional or molecular-dynamics treatments of adsorption, extending earlier high-temperature FEA potentials into the strongly heterogeneous regime.
Once the graph generation statistics are specified, the population-dynamics solution of the self-consistent equation yields $U_{\mathrm{eff}}(\beta)$ without direct simulation of the fluid.
The model predicts that interaction-energy distributions deep inside a rough solid are close to Gaussian, while distributions near the surface become asymmetric, matching the authors' realistic surface calculations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

An unstated but testable consequence is that isosteric heats of adsorption at cryogenic temperatures should distinguish two adsorbents with identical statistical roughness parameters but different hierarchical branching patterns; a calorimetric series on engineered porous carbons could separate the fluctuation and topology contributions without simulation.
The same replica-plus-branching-tree construction could be applied to other quenched-disorder systems whose disorder is hierarchical, such as transport through disordered porous media or random-field spin models; the paper gestures at this but does not work out concrete cross-system predictions.
The factorization assumption behind the independent pair couplings can be tested directly by generating branching graphs with prescribed triplet constraints $Q_{ij}\ge\min(Q_{ik},Q_{jk})$ and checking whether the Monte Carlo free energy follows the product-measure prediction.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: the paper has a real target and an inventive formalism, but the bridge from the branching-tree ensemble to the sparse-coupling replica model is missing. Eq. (9) is not a counting formula for the trees they simulate, so the topology term in Eq. (32) is, as written, unsupported.

What is genuinely new: the authors identify the high-temperature limitation of FEA potentials and propose a low-temperature correction with an explicit topology term. The replica finite-connectivity machinery and population-dynamics solution are interesting, and the Monte Carlo comparison in Figs. 7-8 does show that a topology-dependent term can capture differences between two graph patterns that the Gaussian fluctuation term alone misses. The realistic-surface section is a reasonable recipe for extracting U0(z) and sigma(z) from a Gaussian-field surface ensemble.

Where it falls down: the stress-test note holds. In any rooted branching tree with leaves at depth H, every pair of leaves shares at least the root-to-branch path, and the fraction of pairs whose last common ancestor sits at a shallow level is O(1), not O(1/N). Eq. (9) instead sets p_k = a_k/N, which is the scaling for a sparse random graph with O(1) connections per site. That is a different ensemble. The product measure in Eq. (8) also discards ultrametric constraints, so the multivariate Gaussian (7) is not the distribution generated by the tree. Thus the Hamiltonian in Eqs. (19)-(20) and the self-consistent equation (26) are not derived from the model introduced in Sec. II.A. The MC validation compares Eq. (32) against an ensemble the derivation does not describe; without reporting a_l and alpha_bar values, the agreement could come from fitting. The truncation to a single exponential and reintroduction of averaged alpha_bar is another uncontrolled step, though secondary.

To be fair, the paper does not hide that it is making approximations. But Eq. (9) is presented as a counting formula, and it is wrong for the stated ensemble. This is the load-bearing bridge, not a minor technicality. If the authors either derive the sparse model from actual tree marginals (with the common-root component explicitly removed) or simulate the sparse model directly, the paper could be worth revisiting.

Bottom line: this deserves a serious referee — the problem is real and the approach is inventive — but I would not cite Eq. (32) as it stands. I'd bring it to reading group mainly as a case study in how replica sparse-graph approximations can drift from the original stochastic process.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a theoretical model for the temperature-dependent effective fluid-solid interaction near rough surfaces. A branching random tree is introduced to represent the hierarchical geometry of the solid, and the single-molecule free energy averaged over random field configurations is computed with a replica calculation. The main result is the effective potential in Eq. (32), which adds a "topology" term to the standard Gaussian fluctuation term and is claimed to capture the low-temperature contribution of hierarchical roughness. The authors solve the replica-symmetric self-consistency equation by population dynamics, compare the resulting effective potential with Monte Carlo simulations on random branching-tree ensembles, and also apply the formula to a realistic corrugated carbon surface using fitted U0(z) and sigma(z). The paper ends with a discussion of broader applications to social and biological networks.

Significance. The intended contribution is potentially significant: a closed-form effective potential with an explicit topology-dependent term would be useful for density functional theory and molecular dynamics studies of adsorption on rough materials. The paper also contains useful numerical machinery (population dynamics for finite-connectivity replica equations) and a physically motivated Monte Carlo validation protocol. However, the significance is not established as written, because the model that is actually solved in the replica calculation is a sparse random-network model, not the branching-tree model that motivates the paper and that is used in the Monte Carlo comparisons. The central claim that hierarchical tree geometry induces the low-temperature topology term is therefore unsupported by the derivation presented.

major comments (4)

[Section II.A, Eqs. (8)-(9) and Eq. (18)] The sparse normalization p_k = a_k/N is incompatible with the branching-tree ensemble. In any rooted tree with N leaves, all N^2 leaf pairs share the root-to-first-divergence path, so the probability mass at the shallowest intersection levels is O(1), not O(1/N); the same is true for any level separating a subtree that contains a finite fraction of the leaves. Equation (9), which implies that only O(N) pairs share any given intersection depth, cannot be derived from the tree ensemble, and the coupling distribution (18), which connects each cluster to O(1) others, does not describe the covariance generated by the tree. The replica-symmetric solution (26) and the topology term in Eq. (32) are therefore derived from a different, sparse random-network model.
[Section II.A, Eq. (8)] The product measure P(Q)=prod rho(Q_ij) discards the ultrametric constraints that any tree imposes. For any three leaves i,j,k in a tree, the two smallest values among Q_ij, Q_ik, Q_jk are equal; independent sampling from rho assigns zero probability to this constraint. Thus the averaged Gaussian measure in Eq. (10) is not the joint distribution of fields generated by the branching-tree model, and the paper gives no argument that the independent-pair marginal statistics suffice. This is a load-bearing issue because the entire replica calculation and the resulting topology term rest on this factorized representation.
[Section II.B, Eqs. (20)-(32)] The truncation of the multi-scale pair potential (20) to a single exponential J(sigma,tau)=c(e^{beta alpha sigma tau}-1), followed by the reintroduction of the averaged alpha_bar in Eq. (32), is uncontrolled. The text states only that the principal term is kept; no estimate of the omitted terms is provided, and the connection between the single c_max used in the replica solution and the alpha_bar used in the final free energy is not derived. In addition, the manuscript does not report the numerical values of a_l, c_l, alpha_l, alpha_bar, or c used in the comparisons, so the theoretical curves in Figs. 7-8 cannot be reproduced.
[Section III.B, Figs. 7-8] The Monte Carlo validation is not quantitative as reported. The tree generating patterns, the resulting a_l and alpha_bar values, and the coupling constant c used in Eq. (26) are not given, and no error bars or statistical uncertainties are provided. More importantly, because the theory is derived from the sparse random-coupling model of Eq. (18) rather than from the tree ensemble used in the simulations, agreement in Figs. 7-8, even if visually good, does not validate the branching-tree derivation. The comparison therefore does not support the paper's central claim that the hierarchical structure of random tree geometry controls the low-temperature behavior.

minor comments (5)

[Section II.A] There is a typo in "Lenndrd-Jones" in the first paragraph, and the abbreviations RBT and BRT are used interchangeably for the branching random tree.
[Page 8, text near Fig. 3] The sentence "Figure 10 demonstrates schematic illustration..." appears to refer to Fig. 3; no Figure 10 exists in the manuscript.
[Eq. (32)] The units and dimensions of sigma, alpha_bar, and m0 are not defined consistently; the text switches between kelvin and reduced units without stating how Eq. (32) is converted.
[Figs. 5-6] The captions and text do not fully define the axes and parameters of the plotted distributions, in particular the ordinate of W(h) and the meaning of the discrete peaks in the distributions.
[Section III.C] The topology term is dropped for the realistic surface model, so this section does not test the central claim; the manuscript should state explicitly that the realistic-surface application uses only the Gaussian fluctuation term and therefore cannot validate the topology contribution.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central effective-potential result is a replica calculation checked against direct Monte Carlo, not a restatement of its inputs.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained and non-circular. The branching-tree ensemble (Sec. II.A) defines random fields via sums along tree branches (Eq. 5); the replica calculation (Eqs. 11-16) transforms the averaged free energy into a finite-connectivity cluster model (Eqs. 18-20); the RS self-consistency condition (Eq. 26) is solved numerically; and the final U_eff formula (Eq. 32) contains a fluctuation term and a topology term whose temperature dependence is not fixed by the input U0 or sigma. The validation in Sec. III.B compares Eq. (32) with direct Monte Carlo on tree ensembles with different variances and generation patterns (Figs. 7-8); the topology term is the only source of pattern dependence, so the test is non-vacuous. alpha_bar is stated to be obtained from the graph generation pattern, and no fitted alpha_bar values are reported, so there is no exhibited reduction of a prediction to a fitted parameter. Self-citations [3,4,22] are used only to motivate the FEA mapping and prior high-T limit, not as the proof of the new topology term; the finite-connectivity and RS machinery is taken from external references [28-30]. The concern raised about Eq. (9) (p_k = a_k/N vs. O(1) pair fractions in a real tree) is a modeling-consistency issue, not circularity: even if the sparse-coupling limit fails to match the simulated tree ensemble, that would be a wrong-model problem, not an identity between the derivation and its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central derivation rests on a chain of modeling choices rather than on measured physical inputs alone. The branching-tree representation and the independent-pair factorization are introduced in this paper, and the final topology term depends on the averaged coupling alpha_bar whose numerical value is not reported in the validation section. The physical inputs U0 and sigma are fitted from Monte Carlo energy samples in the realistic surface application. No new physical entities are postulated; the virtual clusters and effective fields are formal devices.

free parameters (3)

U0(z) = estimated from Monte Carlo energy samples for each slice
Mean solid-fluid interaction energy at height z; enters Eq. (32) as the baseline potential and is extracted from the generated surface ensemble, not from theory.
sigma(z) = estimated from Monte Carlo energy samples for each slice
Standard deviation of the interaction energy fluctuations; determines the Gaussian correction U_fluct = -beta sigma^2/2 in Eq. (32) and is fitted from surface energy samples.
alpha_bar (average connectivity-coupling product) = not reported in the text
The topology term U_topology is proportional to alpha_bar = sum a_l alpha_l / sum a_l. For the graph-model validation, the a_l and c_l should be computed from the tree ensemble statistics, but the text does not show the numerical values used for the plotted theory curves, so the reader cannot tell whether alpha_bar was computed or adjusted.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption The Free Energy Averaging (FEA) mapping from [21,22] defines the effective 1D potential by equating the disorder-averaged free energy to that of a reference system in an external field U_eff.
Used throughout to define the object of study, Eq. (3). It inherits the validity of the FEA approximation from prior work.
domain assumption The solid-fluid interaction energy at a location can be represented as a sum of independent random contributions along a path in a branching tree, Eq. (5).
This is the core modeling step connecting surface geometry to Gaussian random fields with ultrametric covariance, stated in Section II.A.
ad hoc to paper The joint distribution of tree intersection depths factorizes into independent per-pair distributions, Eq. (8).
This ignores ultrametric constraints and is introduced solely to make the replica calculation tractable; its validity is not tested.
ad hoc to paper The coupling distribution (18) treats all pairs as independent discrete random couplings, mapping the problem to a union of finite-connectivity small-world networks.
This goes beyond the tree model; pairs in a tree are strongly constrained by the shared hierarchy, and the product structure is a mean-field-like approximation.
ad hoc to paper The pair potential (20) is truncated to its leading exponential term J(sigma,tau)=c(e^{beta alpha sigma tau}-1) with alpha=beta c_max/2, and later the averaged alpha_bar is used in the final free energy.
The text states this simplification without a controlled expansion; the relation between the truncated c and the averaged alpha_bar in Eq. (32) is not derived.
domain assumption The replica-symmetric ansatz (24) holds for the solution of the self-consistent equation (26).
The replica-symmetric ansatz is standard in the cited spin-glass literature, but its validity for this model is not checked by investigating replica symmetry breaking.

invented entities (2)

Virtual clusters (phi_i)
purpose: Auxiliary occupation numbers appearing in the replicated partition function (16), representing 'clusters' in the transformed model.
Mathematical device from the replica and multinomial expansion; no direct physical observable.
Effective random fields (theta_i)
purpose: Gaussian fields introduced via the Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation to decouple pair interactions, Eq. (19).
Mathematical device; no independent falsifiable handle outside the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Branching random graph model of rough surfaces describes thermal properties of the effective molecular potential." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TEN2YC5R

@misc{pith2026190808002,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Branching random graph model of rough surfaces describes thermal properties of the effective molecular potential},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TEN2YC5R}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08002}
}

read the original abstract

Fluid properties near rough surfaces are crucial in describing fundamental surface phenomena and modern industrial material design implementations. One of the most powerful approaches to model real rough materials is based on the surface representation in terms of random geometry. Understanding the influence of random solid geometry on the low-temperature fluid thermodynamics is a cutting edge problem. Therefore this work extends recent studies bypassing high-temperature expansion and small heterogeneity scale. We introduce random branching trees whose topology reflects the hierarchical properties of a random solid geometry. This mathematical representation allows us to obtain averaged free energy using a statistical model of virtual clusters interacting through random ultrametric pairwise potentials. Our results demonstrate that a significant impact to fluid-solid interface energy is induced by the hierarchical structure of random geometry at low temperature. These calculations coincide with direct Monte Carlo simulations. Due to the study's interdisciplinary nature, the developed approach can be applied to a wide range of quenched disorder systems on random graphs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.08002 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. Schematic illustration of a branching random graph and the process of summing random [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. Schematic illustration of several different realizations of hierarchical solid surface and a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (8 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Schematic illustration of the different distances between the vertices of the graph - euclidean [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Different solutions of the integral equation for the distribution function of local fields in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Different solutions of the integral equation for the distribution function of local fields for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. The temperature dependence of the effective potential is presented for different variances [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8. The dependence of the effective potential on temperature is presented for graphs with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: FIG. 9. Illustration of 3D rough solid surface molecular model geometry (a). Gray balls illustrate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png]

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: B shows histograms of the interaction energy values in these layers, taking into account the modeling over the entire ensemble of surface realizations. Naturally, the average energy value is less when the fluid molecule moves away from the surface (z2 > z1). Of greate…

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: FIG. 11. The behaviour of the effective potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

[1]

Quenched solid density functional theory and pore size analysis of micro-mesoporous carbons

Alexander V Neimark, Yangzheng Lin, Peter I Ravikovitch, and Matthias Thommes. Quenched solid density functional theory and pore size analysis of micro-mesoporous carbons. Carbon, 47(7):1617–1628, 2009

work page 2009
[2]

Density functional theory model of adsorption on amorphous and microporous silica materials

Peter I Ravikovitch and Alexander V Neimark. Density functional theory model of adsorption on amorphous and microporous silica materials. Langmuir, 22(26):11171–11179, 2006

work page 2006
[3]

Density functional theory formulation for ﬂuid ad- sorption on correlated random surfaces

Timur Aslyamov and Aleksey Khlyupin. Density functional theory formulation for ﬂuid ad- sorption on correlated random surfaces. The Journal of chemical physics , 147(15):154703, 2017

work page 2017
[4]

Random surface statistical associat- ing ﬂuid theory: Adsorption of n-alkanes on rough surface

Timur Aslyamov, Vera Pletneva, and Aleksey Khlyupin. Random surface statistical associat- ing ﬂuid theory: Adsorption of n-alkanes on rough surface. The Journal of chemical physics , 150(5):054703, 2019

work page 2019
[5]

Heat of adsorption, adsorption stress, and optimal storage of methane in slit and cylindrical carbon pores predicted by classical density functional theory

Stepan Hlushak. Heat of adsorption, adsorption stress, and optimal storage of methane in slit and cylindrical carbon pores predicted by classical density functional theory. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics , 20(2):872–888, 2018

work page 2018
[6]

Density functional theory meth- ods for characterization of porous materials

John Landers, Gennady Yu Gor, and Alexander V Neimark. Density functional theory meth- ods for characterization of porous materials. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 437:3–32, 2013

work page 2013
[7]

Carbon slit pore model incorporating surface energetical heterogeneity and geometrical corrugation

Jacek Jagiello and James P Olivier. Carbon slit pore model incorporating surface energetical heterogeneity and geometrical corrugation. Adsorption, 19(2-4):777–783, 2013

work page 2013
[8]

Theoretical approach to rough surfaces characterization for silica materials

Timur Aslyamov, Aleksey Khlyupin, Vera Pletneva, and Iskander S Akhatov. Theoretical approach to rough surfaces characterization for silica materials. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2019

work page 2019

Show all 47 references

[9]

Eﬀects of smooth random surface on ﬂuid monolayer thermodynamics

AN Khlyupin. Eﬀects of smooth random surface on ﬂuid monolayer thermodynamics. Journal 24 of Physics: Conference Series , 774(1):012024, 2016

2016
[10]

Wetting transition of nonpolar neutral molecule system on a neutral and atomic length scale roughness substrate

Shiqi Zhou. Wetting transition of nonpolar neutral molecule system on a neutral and atomic length scale roughness substrate. Journal of Statistical Physics , 170(5):979–998, 2018

2018
[11]

Mechanisms for enhanced hydrophobicity by atomic-scale roughness

Yumi Katasho, Yunfeng Liang, Sumihiko Murata, Yasuhiro Fukunaka, Toshifumi Matsuoka, and Satoru Takahashi. Mechanisms for enhanced hydrophobicity by atomic-scale roughness. Scientiﬁc reports, 5:13790, 2015

2015
[12]

Universal phase diagram for wetting on mesoscale roughness

Stephan Herminghaus. Universal phase diagram for wetting on mesoscale roughness. Physical review letters, 109(23):236102, 2012

2012
[13]

Classical density functional study of wetting transitions on nanopatterned surfaces

P Yatsyshin, AO Parry, C Rasc´ on, and S Kalliadasis. Classical density functional study of wetting transitions on nanopatterned surfaces. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter , 29(9):094001, 2017

2017
[14]

Molecular dynamics simulation of frictional properties of couette ﬂow with striped superhydrophobic surfaces under diﬀerent loads

Chengzhi Hu, Dawei Tang, Jizu Lv, Minli Bai, and Xiaoliang Zhang. Molecular dynamics simulation of frictional properties of couette ﬂow with striped superhydrophobic surfaces under diﬀerent loads. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics , 2019

2019
[15]

Investigating the asymmetry in the edl response of c 60/graphene supercapacitors

Eudes E Fileti and Guilherme Colherinhas. Investigating the asymmetry in the edl response of c 60/graphene supercapacitors. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics , 2019

2019
[16]

The model thin ﬁlm alumina catalyst support suitable for catalysis-oriented surface science studies

Anna V Nartova, Andrey V Bukhtiyarov, Ren I Kvon, and Valerii I Bukhtiyarov. The model thin ﬁlm alumina catalyst support suitable for catalysis-oriented surface science studies. Ap- plied Surface Science, 349:310–318, 2015

2015
[17]

Molecular dy- namics investigation of surface roughness scale eﬀect on interfacial thermal conductance at solid-liquid interfaces

Donatas Surblys, Yoshiaki Kawagoe, Masahiko Shibahara, and Taku Ohara. Molecular dy- namics investigation of surface roughness scale eﬀect on interfacial thermal conductance at solid-liquid interfaces. The Journal of chemical physics , 150(11):114705, 2019

2019
[18]

Adsorption, intrusion and freezing in porous silica: the view from the nanoscale

Benoit Coasne, Anne Galarneau, Roland JM Pellenq, and Francesco Di Renzo. Adsorption, intrusion and freezing in porous silica: the view from the nanoscale. Chemical Society Reviews, 42(9):4141–4171, 2013

2013
[19]

Geometric control of bacterial surface accu- mulation

Rachel Mok, J¨ orn Dunkel, and Vasily Kantsler. Geometric control of bacterial surface accu- mulation. Physical Review E, 99(5):052607, 2019

2019
[20]

Bottom-up approach to the coarse-grained surface model: Eﬀective solid–ﬂuid potentials for adsorption on heterogeneous surfaces

Kaihang Shi, Erik E Santiso, and Keith E Gubbins. Bottom-up approach to the coarse-grained surface model: Eﬀective solid–ﬂuid potentials for adsorption on heterogeneous surfaces. Lang- muir, 35(17):5975–5986, 2019

2019
[21]

Eﬀective coarse-grained 25 solid–ﬂuid potentials and their application to model adsorption of ﬂuids on heterogeneous surfaces

Esther Forte, Andrew J Haslam, George Jackson, and Erich A M¨ uller. Eﬀective coarse-grained 25 solid–ﬂuid potentials and their application to model adsorption of ﬂuids on heterogeneous surfaces. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics , 16(36):19165–19180, 2014

2014
[22]

Random process theory approach to geometric hetero- geneous surfaces: Eﬀective ﬂuid–solid interaction

Aleksey Khlyupin and Timur Aslyamov. Random process theory approach to geometric hetero- geneous surfaces: Eﬀective ﬂuid–solid interaction. Journal of Statistical Physics, 167(6):1519– 1545, 2017

2017
[23]

Deter- mination of isosteric heat of adsorption by quenched solid density functional theory.Langmuir, 33(8):1769–1779, 2017

Richard T Cimino, Piotr Kowalczyk, Peter I Ravikovitch, and Alexander V Neimark. Deter- mination of isosteric heat of adsorption by quenched solid density functional theory.Langmuir, 33(8):1769–1779, 2017

2017
[24]

Spin glass theory and beyond: An Intro- duction to the Replica Method and Its Applications , volume 9

Marc M´ ezard, Giorgio Parisi, and Miguel Virasoro. Spin glass theory and beyond: An Intro- duction to the Replica Method and Its Applications , volume 9. World Scientiﬁc Publishing Company, 1987

1987
[25]

Random-ﬁeld instability of the ferromagnetic state

T Schneider and Erling Pytte. Random-ﬁeld instability of the ferromagnetic state. Physical Review B, 15(3):1519, 1977

1977
[26]

Solvable model of a spin-glass

David Sherrington and Scott Kirkpatrick. Solvable model of a spin-glass. Physical review letters, 35(26):1792, 1975

1975
[27]

The bethe lattice spin glass revisited.The European Physical Journal B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems , 20(2):217–233, 2001

Marc M´ ezard and Giorgio Parisi. The bethe lattice spin glass revisited.The European Physical Journal B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems , 20(2):217–233, 2001

2001
[28]

Replicated transfer matrix analysis of ising spin models on ‘small world’lattices

T Nikoletopoulos, ACC Coolen, I P´ erez Castillo, NS Skantzos, JPL Hatchett, and B Wem- menhove. Replicated transfer matrix analysis of ising spin models on ‘small world’lattices. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General , 37(25):6455, 2004

2004
[29]

Phase transitions in the three-state ising spin-glass model with ﬁnite connectivity

R Erichsen Jr and WK Theumann. Phase transitions in the three-state ising spin-glass model with ﬁnite connectivity. Physical Review E, 83(6):061126, 2011

2011
[30]

Multicritical points and topology- induced inverse transition in the random-ﬁeld blume-capel model in a random network

R Erichsen Jr, Amanda Azevedo Lopes, and SG Magalhaes. Multicritical points and topology- induced inverse transition in the random-ﬁeld blume-capel model in a random network. Phys- ical Review E, 95(6):062113, 2017

2017
[31]

Spectra of sparse random matrices

Reimer K¨ uhn. Spectra of sparse random matrices. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 41(29):295002, 2008

2008
[32]

Cavity approach to the spectral density of sparse symmetric random matrices

Tim Rogers, Isaac P´ erez Castillo, Reimer K¨ uhn, and Koujin Takeda. Cavity approach to the spectral density of sparse symmetric random matrices. Physical Review E, 78(3):031116, 2008

2008
[33]

Spectral density of random graphs with topological constraints

Tim Rogers, Conrad P´ erez Vicente, Koujin Takeda, and Isaac P´ erez Castillo. Spectral density of random graphs with topological constraints. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and 26 Theoretical, 43(19):195002, 2010

2010
[34]

An approximation scheme for the density of states of the laplacian on random graphs

DS Dean. An approximation scheme for the density of states of the laplacian on random graphs. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General , 35(12):L153, 2002

2002
[35]

Thermodynamics of small systems

Terrell L Hill. Thermodynamics of small systems . Courier Corporation, 1994

1994
[36]

Exactly solvable models: The road towards a rigorous treatment of phase transitions in ﬁnite systems

Kyrill A Bugaev. Exactly solvable models: The road towards a rigorous treatment of phase transitions in ﬁnite systems. Physics of Particles and Nuclei , 38(4):447–468, 2007

2007
[37]

Complex pole approach in thermodynamic description of ﬂuid mixtures with small number of molecules

Timur Aslyamov and Oleg Dinariev. Complex pole approach in thermodynamic description of ﬂuid mixtures with small number of molecules. Physics Letters A , 378(47):3497–3500, 2014

2014
[38]

On some thermodynamic eﬀects in small molecular systems

TF Aslyamov and O Yu Dinariev. On some thermodynamic eﬀects in small molecular systems. JETP letters, 99(8):452–455, 2014

2014
[39]

Functional control of network dynamics using designed laplacian spectra

Aden Forrow, Francis G Woodhouse, and J¨ orn Dunkel. Functional control of network dynamics using designed laplacian spectra. Physical Review X, 8(4):041043, 2018

2018
[40]

Thermodynamics of evolutionary games

Christoph Adami and Arend Hintze. Thermodynamics of evolutionary games. Physical Review E, 97(6):062136, 2018

2018
[41]

Evolution arrests invasions of cooperative populations

Kirill S Korolev. Evolution arrests invasions of cooperative populations. Physical review letters, 115(20):208104, 2015

2015
[42]

Model of col- lective ﬁsh behavior with hydrodynamic interactions

Audrey Filella, Fran¸ cois Nadal, Cl´ ement Sire, Eva Kanso, and Christophe Eloy. Model of col- lective ﬁsh behavior with hydrodynamic interactions. Physical review letters, 120(19):198101, 2018

2018
[43]

Large-scale patterns in a minimal cognitive ﬂock- ing model: incidental leaders, nematic patterns, and aggregates

Lucas Barberis and Fernando Peruani. Large-scale patterns in a minimal cognitive ﬂock- ing model: incidental leaders, nematic patterns, and aggregates. Physical review letters , 117(24):248001, 2016

2016
[44]

Statistical analysis of loopy belief propagation in random ﬁelds

Muneki Yasuda, Shun Kataoka, and Kazuyuki Tanaka. Statistical analysis of loopy belief propagation in random ﬁelds. Physical Review E, 92(4):042120, 2015

2015
[45]

Finite connectivity attractor neural networks

B Wemmenhove and ACC Coolen. Finite connectivity attractor neural networks. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General , 36(37):9617, 2003

2003
[46]

Determining computational complexity from characteristic ‘phase transitions’

R´ emi Monasson, Riccardo Zecchina, Scott Kirkpatrick, Bart Selman, and Lidror Troyan- sky. Determining computational complexity from characteristic ‘phase transitions’. Nature, 400(6740):133, 1999

1999
[47]

Euclidean random matrices, the glass transition and the boson peak

Parisi G. Euclidean random matrices, the glass transition and the boson peak. The European Physical Journal E , 9(3):213–218, 2002. 27

2002

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Quenched solid density functional theory and pore size analysis of micro-mesoporous carbons

Alexander V Neimark, Yangzheng Lin, Peter I Ravikovitch, and Matthias Thommes. Quenched solid density functional theory and pore size analysis of micro-mesoporous carbons. Carbon, 47(7):1617–1628, 2009

work page 2009

[2] [2]

Density functional theory model of adsorption on amorphous and microporous silica materials

Peter I Ravikovitch and Alexander V Neimark. Density functional theory model of adsorption on amorphous and microporous silica materials. Langmuir, 22(26):11171–11179, 2006

work page 2006

[3] [3]

Density functional theory formulation for ﬂuid ad- sorption on correlated random surfaces

Timur Aslyamov and Aleksey Khlyupin. Density functional theory formulation for ﬂuid ad- sorption on correlated random surfaces. The Journal of chemical physics , 147(15):154703, 2017

work page 2017

[4] [4]

Random surface statistical associat- ing ﬂuid theory: Adsorption of n-alkanes on rough surface

Timur Aslyamov, Vera Pletneva, and Aleksey Khlyupin. Random surface statistical associat- ing ﬂuid theory: Adsorption of n-alkanes on rough surface. The Journal of chemical physics , 150(5):054703, 2019

work page 2019

[5] [5]

Heat of adsorption, adsorption stress, and optimal storage of methane in slit and cylindrical carbon pores predicted by classical density functional theory

Stepan Hlushak. Heat of adsorption, adsorption stress, and optimal storage of methane in slit and cylindrical carbon pores predicted by classical density functional theory. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics , 20(2):872–888, 2018

work page 2018

[6] [6]

Density functional theory meth- ods for characterization of porous materials

John Landers, Gennady Yu Gor, and Alexander V Neimark. Density functional theory meth- ods for characterization of porous materials. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 437:3–32, 2013

work page 2013

[7] [7]

Carbon slit pore model incorporating surface energetical heterogeneity and geometrical corrugation

Jacek Jagiello and James P Olivier. Carbon slit pore model incorporating surface energetical heterogeneity and geometrical corrugation. Adsorption, 19(2-4):777–783, 2013

work page 2013

[8] [8]

Theoretical approach to rough surfaces characterization for silica materials

Timur Aslyamov, Aleksey Khlyupin, Vera Pletneva, and Iskander S Akhatov. Theoretical approach to rough surfaces characterization for silica materials. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2019

work page 2019