On the modified logarithmic Sobolev inequality for the heat-bath dynamics for 1D systems

Angela Capel; Angelo Lucia; Cambyse Rouz\'e; David P\'erez-Garc\'ia; Ivan Bardet

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 38 references

On the modified logarithmic Sobolev inequality for the heat-bath dynamics for 1D systems

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read On one-dimensional chains, if the Gibbs state of a local commuting Hamiltonian satisfies a mixing condition and a strong quasi-factorization of relative entropy, the heat-bath dynamics has a strictly positive modified logarithmic Sobolev…

desk verdict A clean conditional reduction showing heat-bath MLSI positivity in 1D follows from a mixing condition plus a strong quasi-factorization, but the latter has no known nontrivial quantum instance, so the open problem remains open. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.09004 v2 pith:ZJJQDIS7 submitted 2019-08-23 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mechmath-phmath.MP

Ivan Bardet , Angela Capel , Angelo Lucia , David Pérez-García , Cambyse Rouzé This is my paper · ORCID

classification quant-phcond-mat.stat-mechmath-phmath.MP

keywords modifiedlogarithmicSobolevinequalityheat-bathdynamicsquantumGibbsstaterelativeentropyquasi-factorizationmixingconditionrapidcommutingHamiltonianMarkovchain

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tackles a specific question about how fast an open quantum many-body system reaches thermal equilibrium. It proves a conditional result: for a one-dimensional chain whose fixed point is the Gibbs state of a local commuting Hamiltonian, the heat-bath dynamics has a modified logarithmic Sobolev (MLSI) constant that is strictly positive and independent of chain length, provided the Gibbs state satisfies two static conditions — exponential decay of correlations (a mixing condition) and a strong quasi-factorization of relative entropy. The interest is that a positive MLSI constant yields a much stronger bound on the mixing time than a spectral gap alone, giving rapid mixing. The proof works by a five-step reduction: define a conditional MLSI constant, split the chain into overlapping fixed-size blocks, use quasi-factorization to bound global relative entropy by block conditional quantities, then show the conditional constants on blocks are uniformly positive. The paper also develops technical tools of independent interest, such as an equivalence between recovery on a region and recovery on each of its sites (Theorem 6).

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the conditional modified logarithmic Sobolev constant, $\alpha_\Lambda(L^*_A) = \inf_\rho \mathrm{EP}_A(\rho)/(2D_A(\rho\|\sigma_\Lambda))$, where $\mathrm{EP}_A$ is the entropy production of the heat-bath generator restricted to $A$ and $D_A$ is the conditional relative entropy. The proof machinery also rests on a geometric splitting of the one-dimensional chain into overlapping fixed-size segments $A_i, B_i$ whose pairwise intersections have length $l$, on a quasi-factorization inequality bounding $D(\rho\|\sigma)$ by $D_A + D_B$ times a factor controlled by the mixing condition, and on Lemma 4, which shows each single-site entropy production dominates the single-site conditional relative entropy. Theorem 6 shows that recovery on a region is equivalent to recovery on every site of that region, which is what lets the argument pass from block statements to per-site statements. These pieces combine to reduce a global inequality on a chain of arbitrary length to finitely many inequalities on blocks of fixed size.

What would settle it

Find one 1D commuting-Hamiltonian Gibbs state satisfying the mixing condition for which the strong quasi-factorization quotient $\sup_\rho D_{AB}(\rho\|\sigma_\Lambda)/(D_A(\rho\|\sigma_\Lambda)+D_B(\rho\|\sigma_\Lambda))$ is finite yet grows without bound as $|\Lambda|$ increases, with $A$ and $B$ adjacent fixed-size blocks; that would falsify Assumption 2 for that state while leaving the mixing condition intact. More directly, any explicit state $\rho$ violating inequality (37) for a commuting-Hamiltonian Gibbs state would show the theorem's hypothesis fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 7: for a finite chain $\Lambda$, a $k$-local commuting potential, and its Gibbs state $\sigma_\Lambda$, if the mixing condition (Assumption 1) and the strong quasi-factorization (Assumption 2) hold, then the modified logarithmic Sobolev constant $\alpha(L^*_\Lambda)$ of the heat-bath generator is strictly positive and independent of $|\Lambda|$. The heat-bath generator is the sum over sites of Petz recovery maps for the partial trace; the assumptions are static properties of the Gibbs state. The proof decomposes $\Lambda$ into two families of fixed-size overlapping segments, bounds the global relative entropy by a sum of conditional relative entropies on those segments using a quasi-factorization inequality with an error term controlled by the mixing condition, and then bounds each conditional relative entropy by the corresponding entropy production using Assumption 2 and a per-site data-processing inequality. The paper is explicit that the strong quasi-factorization is the part for which no non-trivial example is currently known.

Load-bearing premise

The argument stands or falls on Assumption 2, the strong quasi-factorization bound with a finite, size-independent constant $f_X(\sigma_\Lambda)$, for which the paper supplies no non-trivial example; the authors explicitly state that the only known case is the tensor-product fixed point, where the theorem was already known.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If Assumptions 1 and 2 hold, every initial state converges to the Gibbs state in trace norm with an exponential rate $\alpha$ independent of $|\Lambda|$; the paper recalls that this gives rapid mixing, an exponential improvement over the bound provided by a spectral gap.
Rapid mixing for the heat-bath dynamics implies, by previously known results cited in the paper, stability of the fixed point against perturbations and a mutual-information area law for the fixed point.
The proof shows the global MLSI constant is at least $\tilde K$ times the minimum conditional MLSI constant on fixed-size blocks, so checking positivity of MLSI becomes a finite, size-independent verification task.
As a byproduct, the paper's Theorem 6 gives a criterion: a state is recoverable from a region if and only if it is recoverable from each site in that region, which is a property of Gibbs states of commuting Hamiltonians.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The theorem is conditional in a way that matters: Section 5.2 and Question 1 concede that the only known instance of Assumption 2 is a tensor-product Gibbs state, for which MLSI positivity was already known; if no non-trivial commuting-Hamiltonian Gibbs state satisfies the assumption, Theorem 7 adds no new example.
Section 5.2 shows that nearby any state close to the identity, only an additive-error quasi-factorization follows; this suggests a testable route to counterexamples — numerically evaluate the quotient $D_{AB}/(D_A+D_B)$ for adjacent blocks in small non-trivial chains (for instance, transverse-field Ising or XXZ chains) to see whether the multiplicative bound can hold.
The dependence on the quantum Markov chain structure of Gibbs states, rather than on 1D geometry alone, suggests the same block-splitting strategy might transfer to other geometries where the Gibbs state has the shielding property; the obstruction to dimension two is the lack of a three-way quasi-factorization, which the authors note is open.
If a non-trivial example satisfying Assumption 2 is found, the five-step strategy would immediately give the first size-independent MLSI constant for heat-bath dynamics beyond the tensor-product case; the paper notes that a modified version of this strategy already worked for Schmidt generators.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: this is a solid conditional theorem, not a solution to the heat-bath MLSI problem. The proof of Theorem 7 looks right, and the paper is honest about its own limitations. The catch is Assumption 2: strong quasi-factorization of relative entropy currently has exactly one known instance, the tensor-product fixed point, where the result was already known. As of today, the theorem has no demonstrated application to a genuinely quantum, non-product Gibbs state.

The strategy is the real contribution. Defining a conditional MLSI constant that conditions on the whole exterior (because the DLR condition fails quantumly) is a useful move, and the five-step reduction is coherent: quasi-factorization from Capel–Lucia–Pérez-García, cancellation of log terms via the quantum Markov network property, a recursive geometric argument in 1D, and a final step that turns Assumption 2 into a positive conditional constant. The technical lemmas are useful beyond this application, especially Theorem 6 (equivalence of blockwise and site-wise fixed points of the conditional expectations) and the log-identity for quantum Markov chains. Step 3's constant bookkeeping checks out.

Soft spots, in proportion. Assumption 2 is the load-bearing wall. Section 5.2 explicitly says they lack a proof that the key inequality (37) holds in general, and Section 6 Question 1 records that the only example with f different from 1 is actually f = 1, the tensor-product case. That is not a flaw in the logic—the theorem is a theorem—but it is a real applicability gap. The abstract's 'In particular we show...' is literally conditional, yet a reader could easily infer there are examples beyond tensor products; the introduction does clearly say the manuscript does not solve the problem, which deserves credit. Assumption 1 also has limited examples: high-temperature proximity to identity and a defect-type construction. The paper acknowledges that the geometry forces many boundaries, so standard clustering tools do not directly apply.

Who this is for: researchers working on quantum functional inequalities and mixing times. The conditional framework and the technical lemmas are valuable even though the open problem remains open.

Recommendation: send it to peer review. It deserves referee time. A serious referee can verify the reduction and the lemmas. The appropriate outcome is likely acceptance with the abstract and introduction sharpened so the lack of non-trivial examples is front and center; the paper is publishable as a strategy paper if the editors accept that framing.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper develops a strategy for proving positivity of the modified logarithmic Sobolev (MLSI) constant for the heat-bath generator associated with a 1D commuting local Hamiltonian, conditional on two assumptions on the Gibbs state: an exponential clustering/mixing condition (Assumption 1) and a strong quasi-factorization of the conditional relative entropy (Assumption 2). Theorem 7 states that if both assumptions hold, the MLSI constant is strictly positive and independent of the chain length. The proof has four steps: a quasi-factorization bound in terms of conditional relative entropies on two overlapping regions, a decomposition of the conditional relative entropy into fixed-size regions using the quantum Markov network property, a comparison of the global entropy production with the conditional entropy productions under Assumption 1, and a lower bound on the conditional MLSI constants using Lemma 4 and Assumption 2. Section 5 discusses the two assumptions, and Section 6 lists open problems, including the lack of non-trivial examples for Assumption 2.

Significance. The four-step proof of Theorem 7 is careful and, as far as I can check, logically valid. The introduction of a conditional MLSI constant and the use of the quantum Markov network structure of commuting-Hamiltonian Gibbs states to cancel boundary logarithms are useful techniques that may be applicable beyond this setting. The technical results Theorem 6 and Corollary 3 are of independent interest. If Assumption 2 is ever verified for a genuinely quantum, non-product Gibbs state, the result would give the first size-independent positive MLSI constant for heat-bath dynamics in 1D, with implications for rapid mixing. However, the paper currently provides no such verification: Section 5.2 and Section 6, Question 1 state explicitly that the only known case is the tensor-product fixed point, for which the conclusion was already known from [8]. Thus the significance of the paper depends on an open assumption, and the advertised 1D result is not yet instantiated beyond the classical/tensor-product regime. The authors are honest about this limitation, but the abstract and title currently overstate what is demonstrated.

major comments (2)

[Section 5.2, Eq. (37); Section 6, Question 1] The central result is gated by Assumption 2, yet no non-tensor-product Gibbs state satisfying it is exhibited. The text explicitly states that 'we lack a proof that, in general, it satisfies the necessary conditions for (37) to hold' and Question 1 records that the only known example is a tensor-product fixed point with f=1, exactly the case where MLSI positivity was already established in [8]. Consequently, Theorem 7 does not currently apply to any genuinely quantum, non-product Gibbs state of a 1D commuting Hamiltonian, and the abstract's 'In particular ... for 1D systems' overstates what is established. I request either a non-trivial example, or a proof of (37) for a concrete class of commuting Hamiltonians, or a substantial reframing of the paper as a conditional strategy with the open status of Assumption 2 stated in the abstract.
[Section 5.2, final paragraph] The authors' own analysis shows that the high-temperature perturbation argument, which works for Assumption 1 in Proposition 6, fails for Assumption 2: it yields only an additive bound D_AB(rho||sigma) <= D_A(rho||sigma) + D_B(rho||sigma) + 3 log((1+epsilon)/(1-epsilon)), which the text correctly notes cannot be used to prove positivity of an MLSI constant. This reinforces Major Comment 1 and should be acknowledged prominently, so that readers do not infer that the assumptions are known to be satisfiable in the quantum regime.

minor comments (4)

[Step 4, p. 19] The sentence 'only depends on sigma_Lambda and does depend on the size of Lambda' appears to contain a typo; the context and the desired independence of |Lambda| indicate it should read 'does not depend on the size of Lambda'.
[Section 5.1, Proposition 7] The proof of Proposition 7 is sketched rather than fully rigorous; in particular, the derivation of the bounds on the normalization constant Z and the passage from (33) to (A1-weaker) via (34) are not displayed in detail. Since this is one of the few concrete illustrations of Assumption 1, an expanded proof would improve reproducibility.
[Introduction, p. 3] There is a typo: 'analyizing' should be 'analyzing'.
[General] The figures are referenced in the proof but the captions are minimal; defining the labels Ai, Bi, Ci, Di, Ei, Fi in the captions would make Sections 4 and 5 easier to follow.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: Theorem 7 is an explicit conditional theorem, and the admitted lack of nontrivial examples of Assumption 2 is an applicability gap, not a circular derivation.

full rationale

The derivation chain is non-circular. Theorem 7 states a conditional implication: if the Gibbs state satisfies Assumption 1 (mixing condition) and Assumption 2 (strong quasi-factorization), then the heat-bath MLSI constant is positive and size-independent. The proof proceeds by four explicit steps: Step 1 bounds the global relative entropy by two conditional relative entropies using a quasi-factorization inequality from [8]/[9]; Step 2 decomposes a conditional relative entropy over a fixed-size partition using the quantum Markov chain structure of commuting-Hamiltonian Gibbs states (Corollary 1 and Proposition 5); Step 3 converts the conditional relative entropy bounds into a lower bound on the global MLSI constant using Assumption 1; Step 4 lower-bounds the conditional MLSI constant on each fixed-size region via Lemma 4 (which follows from data processing) together with Assumption 2. None of these steps assumes the positivity of the global MLSI constant; Assumption 2 is an explicitly stated hypothesis, not a re-labeling of the conclusion. The self-citations to [8] and [9] are load-bearing in Step 1, but they are independent published mathematical results with their own proofs and do not contain the target theorem; they are not invoked as a uniqueness theorem or as an unverified ansatz. The paper is transparent that Assumption 2 is not known to hold in interesting quantum cases: Section 5.2 states 'we lack a proof that, in general, it satisfies the necessary conditions for (37) to hold' and defers examples to future work, and Section 6, Question 1 records that the only known instance is a tensor-product fixed point. This is an honest limitation about instantiation, not a circularity: the conditional logic remains valid. Therefore no step reduces, by the paper's own equations or by self-citation, to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central theorem is a reduction: it does not prove MLSI positivity for any concrete nontrivial Hamiltonian; it shows that two unproven static conditions (one of which lacks known instances) imply the desired bound. The proof additionally imports the quantum Markov network structure of commuting-Hamiltonian Gibbs states and a Dirichlet form equivalence from prior work.

assumptions (5)

ad hoc to paper Assumption 1 (Mixing condition): for C,D unions of disjoint finite segments, ||sigma_C^{-1/2} tensor sigma_D^{-1/2} sigma_CD sigma_C^{-1/2} tensor sigma_D^{-1/2} - 1_CD||_inf <= K1 e^{-K2 d(C,D)} with K1,K2 independent of Lambda.
Hypothesis of Theorem 7. Sufficient conditions are discussed in Section 5.1 (high temperature, a defect model), but the exponential decay bound itself is assumed.
ad hoc to paper Assumption 2 (Strong quasi-factorization): for every X subset Lambda and every state rho_Lambda, D_X(rho||sigma) <= f_X(sigma) sum_{x in X} D_x(rho||sigma), with f_X finite and independent of |Lambda|.
Hypothesis of Theorem 7. No nontrivial example is known; Section 5.2 leaves the question open, and Section 6 notes only tensor-product states satisfy it.
domain assumption Gibbs states of k-local commuting Hamiltonians are quantum Markov networks (Theorem 3 of [6]): for disjoint A,B,C with B shielding A from C and d(A,C)>k, I_sigma(A:C|B)=0.
Imported from prior literature; used in Step 2 and Proposition 5 to cancel sums of logarithms.
domain assumption Equivalence of Dirichlet forms for heat-bath generators (Lemma 5 of [27]): constants c_A,C_A independent of Lambda satisfy c_A sum_x <f, f-E_x f>_sigma <= <f, f-E_A f>_sigma <= C_A sum_x <f, f-E_x f>_sigma.
Imported from prior literature; used in Theorem 6 to characterize common fixed points of L_A and the single-site generators.
standard math Standard quantum information facts: strong subadditivity of von Neumann entropy, data processing inequality, Petz recovery map and equality conditions, additivity and superadditivity of relative entropy.
Invoked in Lemma 4, Corollary 2, Step 2, and Step 4 without proof.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the modified logarithmic Sobolev inequality for the heat-bath dynamics for 1D systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZJJQDIS7

@misc{pith2026190809004,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the modified logarithmic Sobolev inequality for the heat-bath dynamics for 1D systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZJJQDIS7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.09004}
}

read the original abstract

The mixing time of Markovian dissipative evolutions of open quantum many-body systems can be bounded using optimal constants of certain quantum functional inequalities, such as the modified logarithmic Sobolev constant. For classical spin systems, the positivity of such constants follows from a mixing condition for the Gibbs measure, via quasi-factorization results for the entropy. Inspired by the classical case, we present a strategy to derive the positivity of the modified logarithmic Sobolev constant associated to the dynamics of certain quantum systems from some clustering conditions on the Gibbs state of a local, commuting Hamiltonian. In particular we show that for the heat-bath dynamics for 1D systems, the modified logarithmic Sobolev constant is positive under the assumptions of a mixing condition on the Gibbs state and a strong quasi-factorization of the relative entropy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.09004 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Splitting of Λ in fixed-sized subsets Ai and Bi , of which we just show the first four terms. We reduce for simplicity to the case k = 2, l = 1. More specifically, fix l ∈ N so that K1e −K2l < 1 2 , for K1 and K2 the constants appearing in the mixing condition, and consider the splitting of Λ given in terms of A and B verifying the following conditions (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Splitting of A in fixed-sized subsets Ai so that their boundaries do not overlap. For simplicity we restrict to the case k = 2, l = 1. in [8], and recalling the definition for the conditional relative entropy in XZ and ZY , respectively, this inequality can be rewritten as D(ρXZY ||σXZY ) ≤ 1 1 − 2kh(σXY )k∞ [DXZ(ρXZY ||σXZY ) + DZY (ρXZY ||σXZY )] . Finally, inequality (18) follows just by replacing in this express… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Notation introduced in the splitting of Λ into size-fixed Ai and Bi for the discussion in Assumption 1. For simplicity we restrict to the case k = 2, l = 1. for every x ∈ X. Furthermore, because of Assumption 2, we obtain the following lower bound for the conditional MLSI constant αΛ(L ∗ X) ≥ 1 2fX(σΛ) , (27) which is strictly positive, only depends on σΛ and does depend on the size of Λ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/fu… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Decomposition of σΛ into the product of commuting terms for k = 3 and l = 5, assuming that Λ is decomposed only into A1, B1 and A2 for simplification. Next, with a much more elaborate but similar in spirit proof, we can show that states with a defect at site i so that …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

[8]

Capel, A

A. Capel, A. Lucia, and D. P´ erez-Garc´ ıa. Quantum conditional relative entropy and quasi-factorization of the relative entropy. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. , 51:484001, 2018

work page 2018
[1]

I. Bardet. Estimating the decoherence time using non-commutative functional inequalities. preprint, arxiv:1710.01039, 2017

arXiv 2017
[2]

Approximate tensorization of the relative entropy for noncommuting conditional expectations

I. Bardet, A. Capel, and C. Rouz´ e. Approximate tensorization of the relative entropy for noncommut- ing conditional expectations. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2001.07981 , 2020

work page Pith review arXiv 2001
[3]

Beigi, N

S. Beigi, N. Datta, and C. Rouz´ e. Quantum reverse hypercontractivity: its tensorization and applica- tion to strong converses. Commun. Math. Phys. , 376(2):753–794, 2020

work page 2020
[4]

Bertini, N

L. Bertini, N. Cancrini, and F. Cesi. The spectral gap for a glauber-type dynamics in a continuous gas. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare , 38:91171908, 2002

work page 2002
[5]

F. G. S. L. Brandao, T. S. Cubitt, A. Lucia, S. Michalakis, and D. Perez-Garcia. Area law for ﬁxed points of rapidly mixing dissipative quantum systems. J. Math. Phys. , 56:102202, Oct 2015

work page 2015
[6]

Brown and D

W. Brown and D. Poulin. Quantum markov networks and commuting hamiltonians. preprint, arXiv:1206.0755, 2012

arXiv 2012
[7]

A. Capel. Quantum Logarithmic Sobolev Inequalities for Quantum Many-Body Systems: An approach via Quasi-Factorization of the Relative Entropy . Ph.D. thesis at Universidad Aut´ onoma de Madrid, 2019

work page 2019

Show all 38 references

[9]

Capel, A

A. Capel, A. Lucia, and D. P´ erez-Garc´ ıa. Superadditivity of quantum relative entropy for general states. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory , 64(7):4758–4765, 2018

2018
[10]

Capel, C

A. Capel, C. Rouz´ e, and D. Stilck Fran¸ ca. The modiﬁed logarithmic Sobolev inequality for quantum spin systems: classical and commuting nearest neighbour interactions. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2009.11817, 2020. ON THE MLSI FOR THE HEAT-BATH DYNAMICS FOR 1D SYSTEMS 27

2009 arXiv
[11]

F. Cesi. Quasi-factorization of the entropy and logarithmic sobolev inequalities for gibbs random ﬁelds. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields , 120:569–584, 2001

2001
[12]

T. S. Cubitt, A. Lucia, S. Michalakis, and D. Perez-Garcia. Stability of Local Quantum Dissipative Systems. Commun. Math. Phys. , 337(3):1275–1315, apr 2015

2015
[13]

Dai Pra, A

P. Dai Pra, A. M. Paganoni, and G. Posta. Entropy inequalities for unbounded spin systems. Ann. Probab., 30(4):1959–1976, 10 2002

1959
[14]

E. B. Davies. Generators of dynamical semigroups. J. Funct. Anal. , 34(3):421–432, 1979

1979
[15]

Dobrushin

R. Dobrushin. Description of a random ﬁeld by means of conditional probabilities and the conditions governing its regularity. Theor. Probab. Appl. , 13:1977224, 1968

1968
[16]

Dobrushin and S

R. Dobrushin and S. B. Shlosman. Constructive criterion for the uniqueness of gibbs ﬁeld. Statistical Physics and Dynamical Systems , pages 347–370, 1985

1985
[17]

Dobrushin and S

R. Dobrushin and S. B. Shlosman. Complete analytical interactions: Constructive description. J. Stat. Phys., 46:983–1014, 1987

1987
[18]

Fannes and R

M. Fannes and R. Werner. Boundary conditions for quantum lattice systems. preprint, arXiv:9504090, 1995

1995
[19]

Gorini, A

V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski, and E. C. G. Sudarshan. Complete positive dynamical semigroups of n-level systems. J. Math. Phys. , 17:821, 1976

1976
[20]

Hayden, R

P. Hayden, R. Jozsa, D. Petz, and A. Winter. Structure of states which satisfy strong subadditivity of quantum entropy with equality. Commun. Math. Phys. , 246(2):359–374, Apr 2004

2004
[21]

M. J. Kastoryano and F. G. S. L. Brand˜ ao. Quantum Gibbs samplers: The commuting case.Commun. Math. Phys. , 344(3):915–957, Jun 2016

2016
[22]

M. J. Kastoryano and K. Temme. Quantum logarithmic Sobolev inequalities and rapid mixing. J. Math. Physics , 54(5), 2013

2013
[23]

Kraus, H

B. Kraus, H. B¨ uchler, S. Diehl, A. Kantian, A. Micheli, and P. Zoller. Preparation of entangled states by quantum markov processes. Phys. Rev. A , 78:042307, 2013

2013
[24]

Lanford and D

O. Lanford and D. Ruelle. Observables at inﬁnity and states with short range correlations in statistical mechanics. Commun. Math. Phys. , 13:19417215, 1969

1969
[25]

E. H. Lieb and M. B. Ruskai. Proof of the strong subadditivity of quantum mechanical entropy. J. Math. Phys. , 14:1938–1941, 1973

1938
[26]

Lindblad

G. Lindblad. On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups. Commun. Math. Phys. , 48(2):119– 130, 1976

1976
[27]

Majewski, R

A. Majewski, R. Olkiewicz, and B. Zegarlinski. Dissipative dynamics for quantum spin systems on a lattice. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. , 31:2045, 1998

1998
[28]

Martinelli

F. Martinelli. Lectures on glauber dynamics for discrete spin models. Lectures on Probability Theory and Statistics. Lecture Notes in Math , 1717:93–191, 1999

1999
[29]

Martinelli and E

F. Martinelli and E. Olivieri. Approach to equilibrium of glauber dynamics in the one phase region i: The attractive case. Commun. Math. Phys. , 161:447, 1994

1994
[30]

Michalakis and J

S. Michalakis and J. Pytel. Stability of frustration free hamiltonians. Commun. Math. Phys. , 332(2):277–302, 2013

2013
[31]

Mueller, E

M. Mueller, E. Adlam, L. Masanes, and N. Wiebe. Thermalization and canonical typicality in trans- lationinvariant quantum lattice systems. Commun. Math. Phys. , 340(2):499–561, 2015

2015
[32]

Ohya and D

M. Ohya and D. Petz. Quantum Entropy and Its Use . Springer Verlag, Berlin, texts and monographs in physics edition, 1993

1993
[33]

D. Petz. Suﬃcient subalgebras and the relative entropy of states of a von neumann algebra. Commun. Math. Phys. , 105(1):123–131, 1986

1986
[34]

D. Petz. Monotonicity of quantum relative entropy revisited. Rev. Math. Phys. , 15:79–91, 2003

2003
[35]

Riera, C

A. Riera, C. Gogolin, and J. Eisert. Thermalization in nature and on a quantum computer. Phys. Rev. Lett., 108:080402, 2012

2012
[36]

Temme, M

K. Temme, M. J. Kastoryano, M. B. Ruskai, M. M. Wolf, and F. Verstraete. The χ2-divergence and mixing times of quantum Markov processes. J. Math. Phys. , 51(12), 2010

2010
[37]

Verstraete, M

F. Verstraete, M. Wolf, and J. Cirac. Quantum computation, quantum state engineering, and quantum phase transitions driven by dissipation. Nat. Phys. , 5:633–636, 2009

2009
[38]

A. Wehrl. General properties of entropy. Rev. Mod. Phys. , 50(2):221–260, 1978. (Bardet) Inria Paris, France Email address : bardetivan@gmail.com 28 BARDET, CAPEL, LUCIA, P ´EREZ-GARC´IA, AND ROUZ ´E (Capel) Instituto de Ciencias Matem´aticas (CSIC-UAM-UC3M-UCM), C/ Nicol ´as ...

1978

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [8]

Capel, A

A. Capel, A. Lucia, and D. P´ erez-Garc´ ıa. Quantum conditional relative entropy and quasi-factorization of the relative entropy. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. , 51:484001, 2018

work page 2018

[2] [1]

I. Bardet. Estimating the decoherence time using non-commutative functional inequalities. preprint, arxiv:1710.01039, 2017

arXiv 2017

[3] [2]

Approximate tensorization of the relative entropy for noncommuting conditional expectations

I. Bardet, A. Capel, and C. Rouz´ e. Approximate tensorization of the relative entropy for noncommut- ing conditional expectations. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2001.07981 , 2020

work page Pith review arXiv 2001

[4] [3]

Beigi, N

S. Beigi, N. Datta, and C. Rouz´ e. Quantum reverse hypercontractivity: its tensorization and applica- tion to strong converses. Commun. Math. Phys. , 376(2):753–794, 2020

work page 2020

[5] [4]

Bertini, N

L. Bertini, N. Cancrini, and F. Cesi. The spectral gap for a glauber-type dynamics in a continuous gas. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare , 38:91171908, 2002

work page 2002

[6] [5]

F. G. S. L. Brandao, T. S. Cubitt, A. Lucia, S. Michalakis, and D. Perez-Garcia. Area law for ﬁxed points of rapidly mixing dissipative quantum systems. J. Math. Phys. , 56:102202, Oct 2015

work page 2015

[7] [6]

Brown and D

W. Brown and D. Poulin. Quantum markov networks and commuting hamiltonians. preprint, arXiv:1206.0755, 2012

arXiv 2012

[8] [7]

A. Capel. Quantum Logarithmic Sobolev Inequalities for Quantum Many-Body Systems: An approach via Quasi-Factorization of the Relative Entropy . Ph.D. thesis at Universidad Aut´ onoma de Madrid, 2019

work page 2019