Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Open Quantum Entanglement: A study of two atomic system in static patch of de Sitter space

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that two atoms in the static patch of de Sitter space, coupled to a massless scalar bath, develop late-time entanglement and violate the Bell-CHSH inequality.

desk verdict The 'simplifying' condition coth(πkω0)=0 makes the GKSL generator non-positive and the late-time equilibrium singular, so the central solution is not valid; this is a desk reject. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.09929 v4 pith:B45BTDJS submitted 2019-08-26 hep-th gr-qcquant-ph

Samim Akhtar , Sayantan Choudhury , Satyaki Chowdhury , Debopam Goswami , Sudhakar Panda , Abinash Swain This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qcquant-ph MSC 81P4081S2283C47 PACS 03.65.Ud03.65.Yz04.62.+v
keywords openquantumsystemsdeSitterspaceentanglementGSKLmasterequationBell-CHSHinequalitytwo-levelatomsWightmanfunctionsdiscord
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that the curvature of de Sitter space alone can generate long-range quantum correlations between two atoms. It models the atoms as an open quantum system: two identical two-level atoms weakly coupled to a massless scalar field acting as a thermal bath in the static patch of de Sitter spacetime. After tracing out the bath, the paper solves the Gorini-Kossakowski-Sudarshan-Lindblad (GSKL) master equation analytically and uses the resulting reduced density matrix to compute six entanglement measures. All of them start at zero, grow in time, and saturate at late times, and the correlation matrix after local filtering violates the Bell-CHSH inequality. If the calculation is right, de Sitter spacetime itself--without any axion or additional model--is sufficient to create nonlocal bipartite entanglement.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the GSKL master equation for the reduced two-atom density matrix, $\frac{d}{d\tau}\rho_{\rm System}=-i[H_{\rm eff},\rho_{\rm System}]+\mathcal{L}[\rho_{\rm System}]$, built from two components: an effective Lamb-shift Hamiltonian that takes the form of a Heisenberg spin chain, and a Lindbladian dissipator whose coefficient matrix $C^{\alpha\beta}_{ij}$ is fixed by the Wightman functions of a massless conformally coupled scalar in the static de Sitter patch. Those Wightman functions are Fourier- and Hilbert-transformed to produce the Hamiltonian and GSKL coefficient matrices; the equations are simplified by changing basis from $\{\sigma_1,\sigma_2,\sigma_3\}$ to $\{\sigma_+,\sigma_-,\sigma_3\}$; and the late-time equilibrium density matrix $\rho_{\rm System}(\infty)=e^{-\beta H_{\rm System}}/\mathrm{Tr}(e^{-\beta H_{\rm System}})$ supplies the boundary conditions. This machinery converts a large coupled set of Bloch-vector equations into an analytically solvable linear system whose three decay rates $f_1(\omega),f_2(\omega),f_3(\omega)$ control the approach to equilibrium.

What would settle it

Compute the eigenvalues of the GSKL coefficient matrix $C^{\alpha\beta}_{ij}$ with the adopted values $C_{++}=C_{--}=0$, $C_{-+}=-C_{+-}=\pm i\tilde B$; the matrix has the form $\begin{pmatrix}0&i\tilde B\\-i\tilde B&0\end{pmatrix}$, so its eigenvalues are $\pm|\tilde B|$, which means the generator is not completely positive. Equivalently, evolve the paper's Bloch-vector solution at an intermediate time and check whether the reduced density matrix remains positive semidefinite; a negative eigenvalue at any time would directly falsify the claim that this is a valid open-quantum-system evolution.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the reduced state of two atoms in the static patch of de Sitter space, evolved under the GSKL master equation with both the effective Lamb-shift Hamiltonian and the Lindbladian, has a late-time equilibrium form with Bloch-vector components $a_{03}(\infty)=a_{30}(\infty)=-\tanh(\pi k\omega)$, $a_{33}(\infty)=\tanh^2(\pi k\omega)$, and vanishing off-diagonal components. From that density matrix the paper derives Von Neumann entropy, Renyi entropy, logarithmic negativity, concurrence, entanglement of formation, and quantum discord, each increasing from zero and saturating at late time. It then shows that after passing the two detectors through local filters, the filtered correlation matrix satisfies $c'(c')^\dagger>1$, equivalently $(a_{+-}+|a_{--}|)^4>(1-a_{33})^2[(1+a_{33})^2-(a_{03}+a_{30})^2]$ in its notation, which the paper takes as the criterion for Bell-CHSH violation. The conclusion is that nonlocality is a generic feature of two-body correlation in de Sitter space, not a special property of a particular matter model.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's results stand on the condition $\coth(\pi k\omega_0)=0$, imposed purely to simplify the GSKL matrix, which forces the atomic frequency to be imaginary, $\omega_0=i(n+1/2)/k$, and makes the late-time equilibrium solution rely on $\tanh(\pi k\omega)$ at a singular value; if that simplification is removed, the analytical solution and all derived entanglement measures may collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the solution is correct, every computed entanglement measure rises from zero and saturates at late times, so de Sitter curvature acts as a persistent source of two-body quantum correlation rather than a transient effect.
  • The equilibrium temperature extracted by matching the late-time density matrix to a Gibbs state is $T=1/(2\pi k)=\sqrt{T_{\rm GH}^2+T_{\rm Unruh}^2}$, directly tying the generated entanglement to horizon temperature and curvature.
  • Bell-CHSH violation is obtained without invoking an axion or any specific nonlocal model, so the paper claims static-patch de Sitter spacetime is by itself sufficient for nonlocality.
  • In the flat-space limit $k\to\infty$ the entanglement measures drop toward zero, while in the zero-acceleration limit $r\to0$ the bath temperature reduces to the Gibbons-Hawking temperature, indicating that curvature and observer acceleration drive the effect.
  • The single-atom reduced state remains unentangled while the two-atom state is entangled, so the correlation is genuinely between the two atoms and not merely an artifact of each atom's interaction with the bath.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the simplification $\coth(\pi k\omega_0)=0$ forces the atomic frequency to be purely imaginary, $\omega_0=i(n+1/2)/k$, and with that choice the GSKL coefficient matrix has vanishing diagonal entries and off-diagonal entries $\pm i\tilde B$, so it is not positive semidefinite; a direct check would show whether the master equation is completely positive or whether the evolved de
  • Editorial extension: repeat the derivation with real $\omega_0$ while keeping the full $\coth(\pi k\omega_0)$ factors; if the saturation and Bell-CHSH violation persist for physical frequencies the result is robust, and if they vanish the curvature-generated nonlocality claim is an artifact of the simplification.
  • Editorial connection: in the inflationary (planar) patch of de Sitter, the same kind of imaginary-frequency structure is expected from conformal time dependence, so this calculation could be translated into a comparison with standard cosmological correlation functions.
  • Editorial note: the Bell test here is performed after local filtering and uses the necessary condition $cc^\dagger>1$; an independent check of the raw Bell-CHSH expectation value against the bound $|\langle B_{\rm CHSH}\rangle|\le2$ would clarify whether the filtered criterion coincides with genuine Bell violation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies two two-level atoms as an open quantum system in the static patch of de Sitter space, with the bath modeled by a massless conformally coupled scalar field. The authors compute the relevant Wightman functions, construct an effective Hamiltonian and a GKSL dissipator, and then solve the master equation for the Bloch-vector components under the condition coth(πkω0)=0. Using that solution, they evaluate von Neumann entropy, Rényi entropy, logarithmic negativity, concurrence, entanglement of formation, quantum discord, and Bell-CHSH violation, concluding that late-time entanglement saturates and that the Bell-CHSH inequality is violated in de Sitter space.

Significance. If the derivation were valid, the paper would provide a relatively model-independent demonstration that de Sitter curvature generates long-range quantum correlations in a two-atomic open quantum system. The manuscript contains substantial analytic work, including explicit Wightman functions, Hilbert-transform integrals, and a finite-time solution of the master equation, and it surveys several entanglement monotones. However, the central derivation depends on an ad hoc imaginary-frequency condition that makes the GKSL matrix non-positive and the late-time equilibrium singular. As written, the master equation is not completely positive and the resulting density matrix is not guaranteed to be a valid quantum state; consequently the entanglement measures and Bell-CHSH analysis built on it do not establish the paper's claims.

major comments (5)
  1. [§2, Eqs. (2.6)–(2.7); Appendix B] The condition coth(πkω0)=0 is imposed solely 'to simplify the mathematical form of GSKL matrix' and forces ω0=i(n+1/2)/k. This makes the atomic Hamiltonian in Eq. (2.2) non-Hermitian, since the level splitting is imaginary. All subsequent results—the coefficients in Appendix B, the integrals in Appendix D, and the finite-time solution in Section 6—are computed under this assumption. The sub-horizon remark in Appendix B does not justify an imaginary energy gap for a two-level atom. This is a load-bearing ad hoc assumption, not a derived or controlled limit, and it undermines the physical interpretation of the entire model.
  2. [§3, §5, and Appendix B, Eqs. (3.4), (5.3), (B.10)–(B.14)] With the imaginary-frequency condition, the GKSL coefficient matrix has diagonal entries A=0 and off-diagonal entries C_{+-}=-iB and C_{-+}=iB, with B=-µ²/(8πk)(n+1/2). For B≠0 this matrix is neither Hermitian nor positive semidefinite; its eigenvalues are ±B. Hence the generator in Eq. (3.4) is not a Lindblad generator and does not define a completely positive dynamical semigroup. The reduced density matrix obtained from this master equation therefore need not be a valid quantum state, and every entanglement measure and the Bell-CHSH analysis built on it lack a valid foundation.
  3. [§6.1, Eqs. (6.10)–(6.14)] The late-time fixed point is written in terms of tanh(πkω). At the half-integer imaginary values selected in Eq. (2.6), namely πkω=iπ(n+1/2), tanh has a pole, so the equilibrium density matrix in Eq. (6.12) is singular rather than a thermal state. If the renormalized frequency ω is intended to avoid these poles, the text must demonstrate this explicitly, since Eq. (2.5) defines ω through a complex Lamb-shift correction whose imaginary part is not computed. As written, the boundary conditions used to fix the constants g_i in Section 6.2 are not well-defined, and the temperature identification T=1/(2πk) in Eq. (6.14) is not justified.
  4. [§7.1, §7.5, and §9] The paper treats the von Neumann entropy of the reduced two-atom state and the quantum discord as entanglement witnesses and concludes in Section 9 that nonzero values of both imply quantum entanglement. This is incorrect: both quantities are positive for many separable mixed states, and discord measures nonclassical correlations rather than entanglement. The claim that these measures establish entanglement should be removed or replaced by statements about total correlations. The valid entanglement measures used elsewhere, namely logarithmic negativity and concurrence, should be the basis for any entanglement claim.
  5. [§8, Eqs. (8.12)–(8.13), Fig. 18] The Bell-CHSH violation is presented by plotting J1(t) and J2(t), but the text does not specify the initial state, parameter values, or normalization used in Fig. 18, and no explicit measurement directions (a,b,a',b') are provided. The eigenvalue criterion can establish violation in principle, but only if the eigenvalues of c'(c')† are correctly computed for the actual density matrix; the derivation in Steps 2–4 contains unexplained inequalities, and the plots compare normalized functions rather than the raw criterion. As it stands, the claim that the inequality is 'always satisfied' is not supported by the presented evidence.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Appendix D, Eqs. (D.6), (D.8), (D.14)] The labels for the integrals appear to be swapped: the text in Section D.1 refers to 'Integral I' as Θ2, while Section D.2 refers to 'Integral II' as Θ1. This makes the appendix difficult to follow.
  2. [§7.4, Eq. (7.27)] The expression for the entanglement of formation appears garbled: it does not match the standard formula h((1+√(1−C²))/2) and seems to contain sign errors. If this expression was used in the plots, the results for entanglement of formation should be recomputed.
  3. [§7.3, Eq. (7.13)] The logarithmic negativity expression contains an unexplained numerical factor 17/100 and mixes notations in a way that makes the formula difficult to verify; the authors should display the fully simplified eigenvalues and the trace norm explicitly.
  4. [Figures 3–18] The plots are not reproducible as presented: the parameter values, initial states, and normalization conventions are stated only vaguely in the captions, and several plots lack clear legends or axis labels. The authors should specify all parameters used in each figure.
  5. [Throughout] The acronym is written as GSKL in most places but GKSL in others; the standard ordering is GKSL (Gorini–Kossakowski–Sudarshan–Lindblad), and this should be made consistent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the two-atom GKSL solution and the entanglement measures are computed from the model's Wightman functions rather than being fed back as inputs.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained: the two-body Wightman functions (App. A), their Fourier/Hilbert transforms (Eqs. 4.13-4.15), the GSKL and effective-Hamiltonian coefficient matrices (Apps. B and C), the master equation (Eq. 3.4), and the finite-time Bloch-vector solutions (Eqs. 6.34-6.40) are algebraic consequences of the stated model. The entanglement measures (Eqs. 7.3, 7.6, 7.13, 7.26, 7.39) and the Bell-CHSH comparison functions (Eqs. 8.12-8.13) are evaluated from these Bloch coefficients, so the outputs are not equal to the inputs by definition. The equilibrium temperature T=1/(2πk) is extracted by comparing the solved late-time state with a Gibbs-ensemble form (Eqs. 6.12-6.14); this is a parameter identification or consistency check, not a fit to data that is later renamed as a prediction. The relation T=sqrt(T_GH^2+T_Unruh^2) is attributed to the same authors' earlier ref. [28], but the present paper already obtains 1/(2πk) directly, so the self-citation is not load-bearing. The imposed condition coth(πk omega0)=0 and the use of the large-time equilibrium as boundary data are genuine physical-correctness risks — the resulting Lindblad matrix may fail to be completely positive and tanh(πk omega) can become singular if pi k omega is a half-integer multiple of iπ — but those are validity concerns about an assumption, not circular reduction of the claimed results to their inputs. No step can be exhibited in which the paper derives X from Y while X was already used to define Y.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on standard OQS approximations, an ad hoc imaginary-frequency condition, and an inconsistent coupling choice (minimal vs conformal). No new particles or fields are introduced, but the central solution and all measures depend on the unphysical frequency choice.

free parameters (3)
  • imaginary frequency condition coth(πkω0)=0 = ω0 = i(n+1/2)/k for integer n
    Imposed ad hoc in Eq. (2.6)-(2.7) and Appendix B to simplify the GKSL matrix; it makes the diagonal dissipative coefficients vanish, changes the character of the master equation, and is responsible for the non-positive GSKL matrix.
  • coupling strength μ
    Appears in A1, B1, B2 and all entanglement measures; no value is fixed by external data, so the results are parametric in μ.
  • local filter parameter η = real parameter in Eq. (8.8)
    Introduced for the Bell-CHSH analysis; the violation condition is claimed for arbitrary real η but the final plots use specific values.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Born, Markov, and secular approximations hold for the two-atom system in de Sitter space.
    Standard OQS approximations invoked in Section 3; no quantitative justification is given for the de Sitter bath correlation time scales.
  • ad hoc to paper The bath scalar field is massless and conformally coupled.
    Appendix A solves the conformally coupled massless scalar equation, while Section 2 states the field is minimally coupled to gravity. This internal inconsistency changes the Wightman function used in the master equation.
  • ad hoc to paper coth(πkω0)=0 with ω0 imaginary.
    Imposed ad hoc to simplify the GKSL matrix; it forces an imaginary atomic frequency, makes the GKSL matrix non-positive, and causes the equilibrium solution tanh(πkω) to be singular.
  • domain assumption The large-time reduced density matrix is a thermal Gibbs state ρ=e^{-βH}/Z.
    Used in Eq. (6.13) to identify the equilibrium temperature T=1/(2πk) and to fix integration constants in the finite-time solution.
  • ad hoc to paper 2πkω >> 1 and ωc << ω0 limits used to evaluate integrals.
    The large kω expansion in Appendix D makes the thermal factor (1-e^{-2πkω})^{-1} reduce to unity; the Bethe cut-off ωc is later taken to zero, effectively removing the regulator.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Open Quantum Entanglement: A study of two atomic system in static patch of de Sitter space." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/B45BTDJS

@misc{pith2026190809929,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Open Quantum Entanglement: A study of two atomic system in static patch of de Sitter space},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/B45BTDJS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.09929}
}
abstract

In this work, our prime objective is to study non-locality and long-range effects of two-body correlation using quantum entanglement from the various information-theoretic measures in the static patch of de Sitter space using a two-body Open Quantum System (OQS). The OQS is described by a system of two entangled atoms, surrounded by a thermal bath, which is modelled by a massless probe scalar field. Firstly, we partially trace over the bath field and construct the Gorini Kossakowski Sudarshan Lindblad (GSKL) master equation, which describes the time evolution of the reduced subsystem density matrix. This GSKL master equation is characterized by two components, these are-Spin chain interaction Hamiltonian and the Lindbladian. To fix the form of both of them, we compute the Wightman functions for probe massless scalar field. Using this result along with the large time equilibrium behaviour we obtain the analytical solution for reduced density matrix. Further using this solution we evaluate various entanglement measures, namely Von-Neumann entropy, R$e'$nyi entropy, logarithmic negativity, entanglement of formation, concurrence and quantum discord for the two atomic subsystems on the static patch of De-Sitter space. Finally, we have studied the violation of Bell-CHSH inequality, which is the key ingredient to study non-locality in primordial cosmology.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An Open Effective Field Theory for light in a medium

    hep-th 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A dissipative open EFT for photons in a medium is constructed, featuring a deformed advanced gauge symmetry and a noise constraint vμ(jμ+ξμ)=0.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Lecture Notes on the Theory of Open Quantum Systems,

    Daniel A. Lidar “Lecture Notes on the Theory of Open Quantum Systems,” arXiv:1902.00967

    arXiv 1902

  2. [2]

    The Cosmological OTOC: Formulating new cosmological micro-canonical correlation functions for random chaotic fluctuations in Out-of-Equilibrium Quantum Statistical Field Theory

    S. Choudhury, “The Cosmological OTOC: Formulating new cosmological micro-canonical correlation functions for random chaotic fluctuations in Out-of-Equilibrium Quantum Statistical Field Theory,” [arXiv:2005.11750 [hep-th]]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2005

  3. [3]

    The Generalized OTOC from Supersymmetric Quantum Mechanics: Study of Random Fluctuations from Eigenstate Representation of Correlation Functions

    K. Y. Bhagat, B. Bose, S. Choudhury, S. Chowdhury, R. N. Das, S. G. Dastider, N. Gupta, A. Maji, G. D. Pasquino and S. Paul, “The Generalized OTOC from Supersymmetric Quantum Mechanics: Study of Random Fluctuations from Eigenstate Representation of Correlation Functions,” [arXiv:2008.03280 [hep-th]]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  4. [4]

    Dynamics of entanglement in Two-Qubit Open System Interacting with a Squeezed Thermal Bath via Dissipative interaction

    Subhashish Banerjee, V. Ravishankar and R. Srikanth, ”Dynamics of entanglement in two-qubit open quantum system interacting with a squeezed thermal bath via dissipative interaction,” Ann. of Phys. (NY).: 325, 816 (2010), eprint:arXiv:0901.0404

    work page Pith review arXiv 2010

  5. [5]

    Quantum entanglement

    R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki and K. Horodecki “Quantum entanglement” Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 (2009) 865 [quant-ph/0702225]

    arXiv 2009

  6. [6]

    Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels,

    C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Crepeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres and W. K. Wootters, “Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 1895. – 48 –

    work page 1993

  7. [7]

    Quantification of Entanglement of Teleportation in Arbitrary Dimensions

    Sk Sazim, S. Adhikari, Subhashish Banerjee and T. Pramanik, ”Quantification of Entanglement of Teleportation in Arbitrary Dimensions,” Quantum Information Processing13, 863 (2014), arXiv:1208.4200

    work page Pith review arXiv 2014

  8. [8]

    Quantum Error Correction for Beginners

    Simon J. Devitt, Kae Nemoto, William J. Munro “Quantum Error Correction for Beginners” Rep. Prog. Phys. 76 (2013) 076001,

    work page 2013

Show all 66 references
  1. [9]

    Omkar, R

    S. Omkar, R. Srikanth and Subhashish Banerjee, ”Characterization of quantum dynamics using quantum error correction,” Phys. Rev. A 91, 012324 (2015), Eprint:arXiv:1405.0964

    2015 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Entanglement, Nonlinear Dynamics, and the Heisenberg Limit,

    L. Pezze and A. Smerzi “Entanglement, Nonlinear Dynamics, and the Heisenberg Limit,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 100401

    2009

  3. [11]

    Introduction to Computational Chemistry

    Frank Jensen “ Introduction to Computational Chemistry. ” Wiley, 2007,

    2007

  4. [12]

    Quantum entanglement in photosynthetic light harvesting complexes

    Mohan Sarovar, Akihito Ishizaki, Graham R. Fleming, K. Birgitta Whaley “ Quantum entanglement in photosynthetic light harvesting complexes” arXiv:0905.3787

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    Entanglement between living bacteria and quantized light witnessed by Rabi splitting

    C Marletto and D M Coles and T Farrow and V Vedral “Entanglement between living bacteria and quantized light witnessed by Rabi splitting” Journal of Physics Communications

  6. [14]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang , ”Quantum Computation and Quantum Information”, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

    2000

  7. [15]

    Dynamics of quantum entanglement in de Sitter spacetime and thermal Minkowski spacetime,

    Z. Huang and Z. Tian, “Dynamics of quantum entanglement in de Sitter spacetime and thermal Minkowski spacetime,” Nucl. Phys. B 923 (2017) 458

    2017

  8. [16]

    Detecting the Curvature of de Sitter Universe with Two Entangled Atoms,

    Z. Tian, J. Wang, J. Jing and A. Dragan , “Detecting the Curvature of de Sitter Universe with Two Entangled Atoms,” Sci. Rep. 6, 35222 (2016) [arXiv:1605.07350 [quant-ph]]

    2016 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Entanglement dynamics for uniformly accelerated two-level atoms,

    J. Hu and H. Yu , “Entanglement dynamics for uniformly accelerated two-level atoms,” Phys. Rev. A 91, no. 1, 012327 (2015) [arXiv:1501.03321 [quant-ph]]

    2015 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Open quantum system approach to Gibbons-Hawking effect of de Sitter space-time,

    H. Yu, “Open quantum system approach to Gibbons-Hawking effect of de Sitter space-time,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 061101 [arXiv:1101.5235 [gr-qc]]

    2011 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Lindblad, ”On the Generators of Quantum Dynamical Semigroups”, Commun

    G. Lindblad, ”On the Generators of Quantum Dynamical Semigroups”, Commun. Math. Phys. 48 (1976) 119

    1976

  12. [20]

    Gorini, A

    V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski and E. C. G. Sudarshan , ”Completely Positive Dynamical Semigroups of N Level Systems”, J. Math. Phys. 17 (1976) 821

    1976

  13. [21]

    Ingemar Bengtsson, Karol yczkowski , ” Geometry of Quantum States: An Introduction to Quantum Entanglement”, Cambridge University Press

  14. [22]

    Petr Jizba, Toshihico Arimitsu , ”On observability of Renyi’s entropy”, arXiv:cond-mat/0307698

    arXiv

  15. [23]

    M. B. Plenio , ”Logarithmic Negativity: A Full Entanglement Monotone That is not Convex”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) no.9, 090503 [quant-ph/0505071]

    2005 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Wootters , ”Entanglement of formation and concurrence”, Journal Quantum Information & Computation

    William K. Wootters , ”Entanglement of formation and concurrence”, Journal Quantum Information & Computation

  17. [25]

    Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits,

    W. K. Wootters, “Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 2245

    1998

  18. [26]

    Shunlong Luo and Shuangshuang Fu , ”Geometric measure of quantum discord”, Phys. Rev. A 82, 034302

  19. [27]

    Kukita and Y

    S. Kukita and Y. Nambu , ”Entanglement dynamics in de Sitter spacetime”, Quant. Grav. 34 (2017) no.23, 235010 [arXiv:1706.09175 [gr-qc]]

    2017 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Relating the curvature of de Sitter Universe to Open Quantum Lamb Shift Spectroscopy,

    H. Bohra, S. Choudhury, P. Chauhan, A. Mukherjee, P. Narayan, S. Panda and A. Swain, “Relating the curvature of de Sitter Universe to Open Quantum Lamb Shift Spectroscopy,” arXiv:1905.07403 [physics.gen-ph]

    1905 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Birrell and P

    N. Birrell and P. Davies, ”Quantum Fields in Curved Space,” – 49 –

  22. [30]

    Consequences of field quantization in de Sitter type cosmological models,

    E. Tagirov, “Consequences of field quantization in de Sitter type cosmological models,” Annals Phys. 76, 561-579 (1973)

    1973

  23. [31]

    S., Davies P

    Bunch T. S., Davies P. C. W. and Penrose Roger Quantum field theory in de Sitter space: Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A360117134

  24. [32]

    Quantum instability of de Sitter spacetime

    Ford LH. Quantum instability of de Sitter spacetime. Phys Rev D Part Fields. 1985;31(4):710-717

    1985

  25. [33]

    Particle Creation in de Sitter Space,

    E. Mottola, “Particle Creation in de Sitter Space,” Phys. Rev. D 31, 754 (1985)

    1985

  26. [34]

    The Scalar Wave Equation on Static de Sitter and Anti-de Sitter Spaces,

    D. Polarski, “The Scalar Wave Equation on Static de Sitter and Anti-de Sitter Spaces,” Class. Quant. Grav. 6, 893-900 (1989)

    1989

  27. [35]

    Lecture notes on interacting quantum fields in de Sitter space,

    E. T. Akhmedov, “Lecture notes on interacting quantum fields in de Sitter space,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 23 (2014) 1430001 [arXiv:1309.2557 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Les Houches lectures on de Sitter space,

    M. Spradlin, A. Strominger and A. Volovich, “Les Houches lectures on de Sitter space,” hep-th/0110007

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    Inflation,

    D. Baumann, “Inflation,” arXiv:0907.5424 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  30. [38]

    CMB from EFT,

    S. Choudhury, “CMB from EFT,” Universe 5 (2019) no.6, 155 [arXiv:1712.04766 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Inflation to Structures: EFT all the way,

    A. Naskar, S. Choudhury, A. Banerjee and S. Pal, “Inflation to Structures: EFT all the way,” arXiv:1706.08051 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    Effective Field Theory of Dark Matter from membrane inflationary paradigm,

    S. Choudhury and A. Dasgupta, “Effective Field Theory of Dark Matter from membrane inflationary paradigm,” Phys. Dark Univ. 13 (2016) 35 [arXiv:1510.08195 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Lectures on Inflation,

    L. Senatore, “Lectures on Inflation,” arXiv:1609.00716 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    Chakrabarty, Subhashish Banerjee and N

    I. Chakrabarty, Subhashish Banerjee and N. Siddharth, ”A study of Quantum Correlations in Open Quantum Systems,” Quantum Information and Computation: 11, 0541 (2011), eprint:arXiv:1006.1856

    2011 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Subhashish Banerjee, ”Open Quantum Systems:Dynamics of Nonclassical Evolution”, Texts and Readings in Physical Sciences, Volume 20, Springer-Singapore, 2018, https: // doi.org/ 10.1007 /978-981-13-3182-4

    2018

  36. [44]

    Quantum Thermodynamics,

    R. Kosloff, “Quantum Thermodynamics,” Entropy 15 (2013) 2100 [arXiv:1305.2268 [quant-ph]]

    2013 arXiv

  37. [45]

    The Theory of Open Quantum Systems

    Breuer, Heinz-Peter; F. Petruccione “The Theory of Open Quantum Systems” Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-921390-0

  38. [46]

    The Lamb shift in de Sitter spacetime,

    W. Zhou and H. W. Yu , “The Lamb shift in de Sitter spacetime,” Phys. Rev. D 82, 124067 (2010) [arXiv:1012.4055 [hep-th]]

    2010 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Cosmological Event Horizons, Thermodynamics, and Particle Creation,

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking , “Cosmological Event Horizons, Thermodynamics, and Particle Creation,” Phys. Rev. D 15, 2738 (1977). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2738

    1977 doi

  40. [48]

    Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model,

    R. F. Werner, “Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model,” Phys. Rev. A 40 (1989) 4277

    1989

  41. [49]

    Choudhury and S

    S. Choudhury and S. Panda , ”Entangled de Sitter from stringy axionic Bell pair I: an analysis using BunchDavies vacuum”, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) no.1, 52 [arXiv:1708.02265 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Bell violation in the Sky,

    S. Choudhury, S. Panda and R. Singh “Bell violation in the Sky,” Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) no.2, 60 [arXiv:1607.00237 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Quantum entanglement in de Sitter space from stringy axion: An analysis using α vacua,

    S. Choudhury and S. Panda “Quantum entanglement in de Sitter space from stringy axion: An analysis using α vacua,” Nucl. Phys. B 943 (2019) 114606 [arXiv:1712.08299 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Spectrum of cosmological correlation from vacuum fluctuation of Stringy Axion in entangled de Sitter space,

    S. Choudhury and S. Panda, “Spectrum of cosmological correlation from vacuum fluctuation of Stringy Axion in entangled de Sitter space,” arXiv:1809.02905 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  45. [53]

    Bell violation in primordial cosmology,

    S. Choudhury, S. Panda and R. Singh, “Bell violation in primordial cosmology,” Universe 3 (2017) no.1, 13 [arXiv:1612.09445 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  46. [54]

    An accurate bound on tensor-to-scalar ratio and the scale of inflation,

    S. Choudhury and A. Mazumdar, “An accurate bound on tensor-to-scalar ratio and the scale of inflation,” Nucl. Phys. B 882 (2014) 386 [arXiv:1306.4496 [hep-ph]]. – 50 –

    2014 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Brane inflation: A field theory approach in background supergravity,

    S. Choudhury and S. Pal, “Brane inflation: A field theory approach in background supergravity,”

  48. [56]

    Brane inflation in background supergravity,

    S. Choudhury and S. Pal, “Brane inflation in background supergravity,” Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 043529 [arXiv:1102.4206 [hep-th]],

    2012 arXiv

  49. [57]

    DBI Galileon inflation in background SUGRA,

    S. Choudhury and S. Pal, “DBI Galileon inflation in background SUGRA,” Nucl. Phys. B 874 (2013) 85 [arXiv:1208.4433 [hep-th]],

    2013 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Quantum Out-of-Equilibrium Cosmology,

    S. Choudhury, A. Mukherjee, P. Chauhan and S. Bhattacherjee, “Quantum Out-of-Equilibrium Cosmology,” Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) no.4, 320 [arXiv:1809.02732 [hep-th]],

    2019 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Quantum randomness in the Sky,

    S. Choudhury and A. Mukherjee, “Quantum randomness in the Sky,” Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) no.7, 554 [arXiv:1812.04107 [physics.gen-ph]]

    2019 arXiv

  52. [60]

    ”Squashed Entanglement

    Matthias Christandl, Andreas Winter “”Squashed Entanglement” - An Additive Entanglement Measure” arXiv:quant-ph/0308088

    arXiv

  53. [61]

    Entanglement of Distillation and Conditional Mutual Information

    Robert R.Tucci “Entanglement of Distillation and Conditional Mutual Information” arXiv:quant-ph/0202144

    arXiv

  54. [62]

    Chaos and relative entropy,

    Y. O. Nakagawa, G. Srosi and T. Ugajin, “Chaos and relative entropy,” JHEP 1807 (2018) 002 [arXiv:1805.01051 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  55. [63]

    QMetrology from QCosmology: Study with Entangled Two Qubit Open Quantum System in De Sitter Space,

    S. Choudhury, S. Chowdhury, N. Gupta and A. Swain, “QMetrology from QCosmology: Study with Entangled Two Qubit Open Quantum System in De Sitter Space,” [arXiv:2005.13555 [hep-th]]

    2005 arXiv

  56. [64]

    https://www.oeaw.ac.at/en/detail/news/qutrit-complex-quantum-teleportation- achieved-for-the-first-time/

    See the web link: “https://www.oeaw.ac.at/en/detail/news/qutrit-complex-quantum-teleportation- achieved-for-the-first-time/”

  57. [65]

    Quantum teleportation in high dimensions,

    Yi-Han Luo, Han-Sen Zhong, Manuel Erhard, Xi-Lin Wang, Li-Chao Peng, Mario Krenn, Xiao Jiang, Li Li, Nai-Le Liu, Chao-Yang Lu, Anton Zeilinger, Jian-Wei Pan , “Quantum teleportation in high dimensions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 070505 (2019), [ arXiv:1906.09697 [quant-ph]]

    2019 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Banerjee, S

    S. Banerjee, S. Choudhury, S. Chowdhury, R. N. Das, N. Gupta, S. Panda and A. Swain, Indirect detection of Cosmological Constant from large N entangled open quantum system,” [arXiv:2004.13058 [hep-th]]. – 51 –

    2004 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.