Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 52 references

The influence of impurities on the charge carrier mobility of small molecule organic semiconductors

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Multiscale simulations identify molecular oxygen—not water–oxygen complexes—as the source of deep electron traps that limit electron mobility in amorphous small-molecule organic semiconductors.

desk verdict A strong multiscale simulation paper that makes a specific, testable chemical claim--O2 alone, not the water-oxygen complex, is the universal electron trap--but the claim rests on a computed >2 eV polarization shift that is plausible, well-converged, and yet not directly benchmarked against experiment. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.11854 v2 pith:7A4E4BO6 submitted 2019-08-30 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.chem-ph

Pascal Friederich , Artem Fediai , Jing Li , Anirban Mondal , Naresh B. Kotadiya , Franz Symalla , Gert-Jan A. H. Wetzelaer , Denis Andrienko
show 5 more authors
Xavier Blase David Beljonne Paul W. M. Blom Jean-Luc Brédas Wolfgang Wenzel
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softcond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.chem-ph
keywords chargecarriermobilityorganicsemiconductorselectrontrapsmolecularoxygendensityofstateskineticMonteCarlopolarizationenergyamorphousthinfilms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Using multiscale simulations, the paper tries to identify the microscopic source of electron traps that limit charge mobility in amorphous small-molecule organic semiconductors. It argues that ubiquitous water molecules broaden the density of states and create exponential tail states, reducing mobility, especially electron mobility in materials whose LUMO is localized. More decisively, it claims that molecular oxygen alone—not a water–oxygen complex—produces the experimentally observed “universal” electron trap: electrostatic polarization of the host shifts O2's electron affinity by more than 2 eV, making it a deep trap (about 0.4 eV deep in TPBi, 0.67 eV in α-NPD, and 0.8 eV in TCTA). If correct, this identifies a single common impurity behind trap-limited electron transport in commonly used OLED host materials and explains why electron currents are much lower in α-NPD and TCTA than in TPBi.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the bulk electron affinity of an impurity embedded in an amorphous host, computed with the Quantum Patch method—a self-consistent electrostatic-embedding procedure that polarizes the surrounding molecules around a charged state. The key number is the polarization shift of O2's electron affinity, which exceeds 2 eV and turns a weak vacuum electron acceptor into a deep bulk trap. Supporting machinery includes Metropolis Monte Carlo film growth for realistic morphologies, ΔSCF calculations for vacuum ionization potentials and electron affinities, and kinetic Monte Carlo transport simulations that turn these energy levels into mobility predictions and connect to measured current–voltage curves.

What would settle it

Measure the electron trap depth and concentration in deliberately O2-exposed films of TPBi, α-NPD, and TCTA by fitting temperature-dependent electron-only current–voltage curves; if the inferred trap depths are substantially shallower than 0.4, 0.67, and 0.8 eV, or if the O2 concentration needed to reproduce them exceeds the known oxygen uptake, the more-than-2 eV polarization shift is not the operative mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that molecular oxygen is the chemical origin of deep electron traps in amorphous small-molecule organic semiconductors, and that no water–oxygen complex is needed. In vacuum, O2 has a small electron affinity (0.255 eV in their DFT calculation, 0.4 eV experimentally), and on that basis it would not be expected to trap electrons. In the bulk, however, the Quantum Patch calculation gives a polarization stabilization of more than 2 eV for the anionic state of O2, bringing its bulk electron affinity to 1.35 eV in α-NPD, 1.27 eV in TCTA, and 1.84 eV in TPBi relative to the host LUMO levels. The resulting trap depths—0.4 eV for TPBi, 0.67 eV for α-NPD, and 0.8 eV for TCTA—match device-level fits of electron-only current–voltage curves, and kinetic Monte Carlo transport simulations reproduce the observed hierarchy in which α-NPD and TCTA are strongly trap-limited while TPBi still conducts electrons.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that an O2 molecule inside an amorphous organic host gains more than 2 eV of electrostatic stabilization when it is negatively charged—a number that comes from the Quantum Patch calculation and is not directly benchmarked against experimental polarization energies; if the true shift is closer to 1.5 eV, O2 would no longer be a universal deep trap.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If O2 alone creates the universal trap, then removing molecular oxygen during vacuum deposition or encapsulation should suppress the deep electron traps without needing to exclude water.
  • The predicted trap-depth ordering, shallow in TPBi and deep in α-NPD and TCTA, directly explains why electron-only devices in TPBi show much higher currents than in α-NPD and TCTA despite similar or higher computed intrinsic mobilities.
  • Materials design can screen new host candidates by computing the bulk, polarization-corrected electron affinity of O2 in the host, rather than relying on vacuum energy levels.
  • The density-of-states tail caused by water molecules should be a general feature of any impurity with a permanent dipole, so mobility losses from water are expected across hosts rather than being specific to α-NPD.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the polarization shift is real, then any impurity with a small or negative vacuum electron affinity and a strongly localizable excess charge could become a deep trap in a low-dielectric organic host; vacuum electron-affinity lists may systematically underestimate trap formation.
  • A testable corollary is that hosts with higher dielectric constants or larger polarizable volumes should show shallower O2 traps; measuring trap depth as a function of host polarizability would isolate the polarization mechanism.
  • The same multiscale protocol could be applied to O2 in polymer semiconductors or to other small impurities such as N2 and CO2 to see whether the more-than-2 eV shift is universal across disordered organic media.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript presents a multiscale computational study of impurity-induced charge traps in amorphous small-molecule organic semiconductors. The authors generate atomistic morphologies of α-NPD, TCTA, and TPBi, compute vacuum and bulk electron affinities and ionization potentials of host and impurity species (O2, O2–H2O, O2–(H2O)2) using the Quantum Patch method with ΔSCF, and simulate charge transport with kinetic Monte Carlo. They find that water molecules broaden the density of states and create exponential tail states that reduce electron mobility, and they argue that molecular oxygen, through a calculated polarization shift of more than 2 eV in its bulk electron affinity, acts as a deep electron trap with host-dependent trap depths. The computed trap picture is compared with electron-only device current–voltage fits and KMC mobility reductions, leading to the conclusion that O2 alone, rather than water–oxygen complexes, can explain the universal electron trap level in these materials.

Significance. If the central result holds, the identification of molecular oxygen as a universal deep electron trap would be a valuable step toward a microscopic understanding of trap-limited transport in organic electronics and would explain the host-material dependence of electron currents. The paper has genuine strengths: the vacuum electron affinity of O2 is benchmarked against CASPT2 and experiment, the Quantum Patch results are checked for convergence in embedding size and self-consistency, three structurally different hosts are considered, and the transport consequences are examined with explicit KMC simulations. The principal weakness is that the single most load-bearing number—the more-than-2 eV polarization shift of O2 in the host—is not benchmarked against any direct experimental or independent theoretical reference; the device-model trap depths are fitted, so they provide consistency rather than independent validation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.2, Figures 5b and S1] The central claim that O2 alone is a universal deep electron trap rests on the Quantum Patch result that the bulk electron affinity of O2 is shifted by more than 2 eV relative to vacuum. The only support for this specific value is internal convergence of the embedding size and self-consistent iterations in Figure S1, which establishes numerical convergence but not accuracy; the manuscript itself notes that previous work assumed a 1.5 eV polarization shift. If the true shift is near 1.5 eV, the bulk O2 electron affinity would be about 1.8–1.9 eV, comparable to the TPBi LUMO and only marginally deeper than the α-NPD and TCTA LUMOs, so O2 would no longer be a universal deep trap. The authors should provide an external benchmark for this shift (for example, an independent many-body embedding computation or a direct measurement in O2-exposed films) or, at minimum, a quantitative estimate of the error in the Quantum Patch polarization shift.
  2. [Section 3.2, device model and KMC paragraph] The trap depths and concentrations quoted as agreement with experiment are obtained by fitting current–voltage curves, and the KMC simulations use a fixed O2 trap level of 2.6 eV that is the very quantity under test. These comparisons are therefore not independent validations of the calculated trap depth. The text should state clearly that the device fits are consistency checks and should separate fitted parameters from predicted quantities.
  3. [Section 3.2, KMC paragraph] Taking the quoted numbers at face value, the input values appear inconsistent with the reported device-model trap depths. Combining the mean host values (1.35 eV for α-NPD, 1.27 eV for TCTA, 1.84 eV for TPBi) with the 2.6 eV O2 trap level gives trap depths of approximately 1.25, 1.33, and 0.76 eV, which are not 'slightly higher' than the fitted 0.67, 0.8, and 0.4 eV but, for α-NPD and TPBi, roughly twice as deep. The sign convention of the 'negative electron affinities' in Figure 5b and the definition of the 2.6 eV level need to be clarified, and the discrepancy should be reconciled or explicitly discussed.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Methods, first paragraph] The basis set name appears as 'dev2-TZVP' and should read 'def2-TZVP'; there are also duplicated 'ΔSCF procedure' phrases in the Methods and in Figure S1 that should be corrected.
  2. [References] Reference 3 (Tabet et al., F1000Research) appears unrelated to organic solar cells; please verify the bibliography entry.
  3. [Figure 5b and Figure S1] The phrase '(negative) electron affinities' is ambiguous; the axes should be labeled with an explicit energy reference (e.g., eV relative to vacuum) and the sign convention used throughout the text should be stated.
  4. [Section 3.1] The water-shift model assumes that each water molecule affects only the nearest host molecule and that water orientations are static; these assumptions are acknowledged, but their quantitative impact (e.g., through long-range contributions or orientational averaging) is not assessed.
  5. [Section 3.2, KMC simulations] The TPBi energy disorder parameter is fitted to reproduce a target trap-free mobility, which makes the subsequent mobility reductions in Figure 7 less parameter-free than the text implies; this should be stated near Figure 7 as well as in the Methods.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the claimed O2 trap mechanism rests on Quantum Patch bulk electron-affinity calculations that are independent of the experimental J-V fits used for comparison.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is not circular. The paper computes vacuum electron affinities by DFT/CASPT2 benchmarking, then uses the Quantum Patch method to obtain bulk electron affinities of O2 and O2-water complexes in three host materials (Section 3.2, Figure 5). These bulk values are compared with, but not fitted to, the trap depths extracted from experimental electron-only device curves (Et = 0.4 eV for TPBi, 0.67 eV for α-NPD, 0.8 eV for TCTA). The fitted device parameters are used as a consistency check, not as inputs to the Quantum Patch or KMC calculations. The KMC simulations do import a trap level of 2.6 eV from the multiscale calculations, but that level is itself a computed output of the QP procedure rather than a re-statement of the experimental trap depth. The one fitted transport parameter, the TPBi energy disorder ('We therefore fitted the energy disorder parameter to obtain a trap-free mobility of 10-5 cm2/Vs'), affects only the trap-free baseline and does not by construction produce the computed trap-induced mobility reduction. The paper's explicit statement that 'Previous studies assumed a value of 1.5 eV, independent of the type of impurity' highlights that the new claim depends on the unbenchmarked magnitude of the O2 polarization shift (>2 eV). That is a validation and accuracy risk, not circularity: no equation in the paper defines the O2 trap depth in terms of the experimental universal trap level, and the QP calculations are not fitted to the J-V data. Self-citations to the Quantum Patch method are references to a previously published computational methodology, not to the target conclusion. Overall, the derivation is self-contained with respect to the experimental inputs; the main scientific vulnerability is external benchmarking of the polarization shift, which is outside the circularity definition.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim relies on several fitted parameters and domain assumptions, most notably the TPBi disorder fit, the device-model trap parameters, and the O2 trap level in KMC. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (8)
  • TPBi energy disorder σ = 0.115 eV
    Fitted in Section 3.2 to force a trap-free electron mobility of 10^-5 cm2/Vs because the Quantum Patch method overestimates the disorder for TPBi.
  • Device-model trap concentration Nt (TPBi) = 2.6e23 m^-3
    Fitted to experimental J-V curve of TPBi electron-only devices.
  • Device-model trap concentration Nt (α-NPD) = 1.1e24 m^-3
    Fitted to experimental J-V curve.
  • Device-model trap concentration Nt (TCTA) = 7.8e23 m^-3
    Fitted to experimental J-V curve.
  • Device-model trap depth Et (TPBi) = 0.4 eV
    Fitted to experimental J-V curve.
  • Device-model trap depth Et (α-NPD) = 0.67 eV
    Fitted to experimental J-V curve.
  • Device-model trap depth Et (TCTA) = 0.8 eV
    Fitted to experimental J-V curve.
  • O2 trap level used in KMC = 2.6 eV (σ=0.4 eV)
    Chosen as representative O2 trap energy from multiscale simulations, used in KMC mobility predictions.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Hopping transport via Marcus theory is an adequate description of charge motion in these amorphous materials.
    The KMC simulations in Section 3 rely on Marcus-type hopping rates, which is standard but not exact for all regimes.
  • domain assumption The Quantum Patch self-consistent embedding converges to accurate bulk ionization potentials and electron affinities.
    The trap-depth results in Figure 5 depend on this embedding method; only internal convergence tests are provided, with no direct experimental validation for O2 in these hosts.
  • ad hoc to paper Water molecules remain static on the timescale of charge hopping, and only the nearest host molecule experiences the water dipole shift.
    Stated in Section 3.1: the model assumes static water orientation and neglects long-range coulomb interactions, which could affect the DOS tails.
  • domain assumption The amorphous morphologies generated by the Deposit Monte Carlo protocol are representative of thermally evaporated films.
    All transport and trap-depth simulations start from these morphologies; if they differ from experimental film structure, the energies and disorder would change.
  • domain assumption O2 trap concentrations in the films are in the 10^23-10^24 m^-3 range and represent environmental contamination.
    The device fits yield these concentrations (Section 3.2), and the paper attributes them to ambient oxygen incorporation, but no direct oxygen concentration measurement is presented.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The influence of impurities on the charge carrier mobility of small molecule organic semiconductors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7A4E4BO6

@misc{pith2026190811854,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The influence of impurities on the charge carrier mobility of small molecule organic semiconductors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7A4E4BO6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.11854}
}
read the original abstract

Amorphous organic semiconductors based on small molecules and polymers are used in many applications, most prominently organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs) and organic solar cells. Impurities and charge traps are omnipresent in most currently available organic semiconductors and limit charge transport and thus device efficiency. The microscopic cause as well as the chemical nature of these traps are presently not well understood. Using a multiscale model we characterize the influence of impurities on the density of states and charge transport in small-molecule amorphous organic semiconductors. We use the model to quantitatively describe the influence of water molecules and water-oxygen complexes on the electron and hole mobilities. These species are seen to impact the shape of the density of states and to act as explicit charge traps within the energy gap. Our results show that trap states introduced by molecular oxygen can be deep enough to limit the electron mobility in widely used materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.11854 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Potential influence of impurities studied in this work. a) Passive broadening of the density of states (DOS) and exponential tail states caused by e.g. molecules with permanent dipole moments. b) Active trapping of charges caused by impurities with higher electron affinities than the host material. 2. Methods We generated atomistically resolved amorphous thin film morphologies using the Metropolis Monte Carlo based … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. HOMO (black) and LUMO (red) energy shifts of α-NPD molecules as a function of the nearest-atom distance to a water molecule. The inset shows the α-NPD/water conformers that caused the strongest (positive and negative) LUMO level shifts. To quantify the influence of water molecules on the hole and electron mobilities of amorphous α-NPD films, we performed kinetic Monte Carlo simulations on stochastically upscaled per… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. a) The presence of water molecules in α-NPD causes the introduction of exponential tails on the density of states. b) kinetic Monte Carlo simulations of the hole and electron mobility as a function of applied electric field. The exponential tail states caused by the presence of water molecules result in a decrease of the charge carrier mobility, in particular the electron mobility. c) and d) α-NPD HOMO and LUMO for … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Vacuum electron affinities of potential impurities. The highest electron affinities are observed for O2, O2-water complexes and CO2-water complexes. To compare the electron affinity of these potential electron trapping molecules to commonly used organic semiconductors,…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: a-b) Distribution of (negative) electron affinities of host (α-NPD, TCTA and TPBi) and impurity molecules in a) vacuum and b) bulk calculations. While O2 does not act as an electron trap in vacuum, it becomes a trap in thin films. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Current density–voltage characteristics of electron-only devices for TPBi, TCTA and α-NPD, with layer thicknesses of 115 nm, 110 nm, and 111 nm, respectively. The device structure is glass/Al/ organic semiconductor/Ba/Al. Experimental values are shown as symbols, simul…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Electron mobilities of α-NPD, TCTA, TPBi in the presence of a variable concentration of O2 traps. The vertical dashed line indicates the electron concentration. A steep decline of the electron mobility of all materials can be observed when the trap concentration approa…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    High charge-carrier mobility and conductivity are required to achieve high device efficiencies

    Introduction Future prospects of organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs) 1,2 and organic solar cells3,4 rely on the development of new organic semiconductors with optical and electronic properties outperforming those of presently available materials. High charge-carrier mobility and conductivity are required to achieve high device efficiencies. Trapping of ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Methods We generated atomistically resolved amorphous thin film morphologies using the Metropolis Monte Carlo based simulation method Deposit. 21,22 This method mimics the vapor deposition process by subsequently adding molecules to a simulation box where they can explore the energy landscape on the substrate formed by their predecessors. The interaction ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Tabet, A. et al. Supramolecular protein-mediated assembly of brain extracellular matrix glycans. F1000Res. 7, 1827 (2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

    Conclusions We used a multiscale simulation method to investigate the influence of water molecules on the density of states of host materials. We furthermore quantitatively analysed the electron affinity of a series of small inorganic molecules to assess their potential for acting as active electron traps in amorphous organic semiconductors. In agreement ...

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    & Bryce, M

    Liu, Y., Li, C., Ren, Z., Yan, S. & Bryce, M. R. All-organic thermally activated delayed fluorescence materials for organic light-emitting diodes. Nature Reviews Materials 3, 18020 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Lee, J. et al. Deep blue phosphorescent organic light-emitting diodes with very high brightness and efficiency. Nat. Mater. 15, 92–98 (2015)

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Yan, C. et al. Non-fullerene acceptors for organic solar cells. Nature Reviews Materials 3, 18003 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Nicolai, H. T. et al. Unification of trap-limited electron transport in semiconducting polymers. Nat. Mater. 11, 882–887 (2012)

    work page 2012

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    Abbaszadeh, D. et al. Elimination of charge carrier trapping in diluted semiconductors. Nat. Mater. 15, 628–633 (2016)

    2016

  2. [10]

    Mikhnenko, O. V. et al. Trap-limited exciton diffusion in organic semiconductors. Adv. Mater. 26, 1912–1917 (2014)

    2014

  3. [11]

    Kuik, M. et al. Optical detection of deep electron traps in poly(p-phenylene vinylene) light- emitting diodes. Applied Physics Letters vol. 99 183305 (2011)

    2011

  4. [12]

    B., Crăciun, N

    Rohloff, R., Kotadiya, N. B., Crăciun, N. I., Blom, P. W. M. & Wetzelaer, G. A. H. Electron and hole transport in the organic small molecule α-NPD. Applied Physics Letters vol. 110 073301 (2017)

    2017

  5. [13]

    & Blom, P

    Zhang, Y., de Boer, B. & Blom, P. W. M. Trap-free electron transport in poly( p -phenylene vinylene) by deactivation of traps with n -type doping. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 81, (2010)

    2010

  6. [14]

    Friederich, P. et al. Toward Design of Novel Materials for Organic Electronics. Adv. Mater. 31, e1808256 (2019)

    2019

  7. [15]

    Curtarolo, S. et al. The high-throughput highway to computational materials design. Nat. Mater. 12, 191–201 (2013)

    2013

  8. [16]

    K., Wang, T

    Do, K., Ravva, M. K., Wang, T. & Brédas, J.-L. Computational Methodologies for Developing Structure–Morphology–Performance Relationships in Organic Solar Cells: A Protocol Review. Chem. Mater. 29, 346–354 (2017)

    2017

  9. [17]

    D’Avino, G. et al. Electrostatic phenomena in organic semiconductors: fundamentals and implications for photovoltaics. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 28, 433002 (2016)

    2016

  10. [18]

    Kordt, P. et al. Modeling of Organic Light Emitting Diodes: From Molecular to Device Properties. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25, 1955–1971 (2015)

    2015

  11. [19]

    Benduhn, J. et al. Intrinsic non-radiative voltage losses in fullerene-based organic solar cells. Nature Energy 2, 17053 (2017)

    2017

  12. [20]

    B., Mondal, A., Blom, P

    Kotadiya, N. B., Mondal, A., Blom, P. W. M., Andrienko, D. & Wetzelaer, G.-J. A. H. A window to trap-free charge transport in organic semiconducting thin films. Nat. Mater. 18, 1182–1186 (2019). 11

    2019

  13. [21]

    Gomes, J. A. G. et al. Experimental and theoretical study of the atmospherically important O2- H2O complex. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 61, 3082–3086 (2005)

    2005

  14. [22]

    Bell, A. J. & Wright, T. G. Structures and binding energies of O 2 − ·H 2 O and O 2 ·H 2 O. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 6, 4385–4390 (2004)

    2004

  15. [23]

    & Itoh, T

    Mori, T. & Itoh, T. EL Behavior for Blue-Emitting Aluminum Quinoline-Based Organic Light- Emitting Diodes. J. Photopolym. Sci. Technol. 22, 515–520 (2009)

    2009

  16. [24]

    & Wenzel, W

    Neumann, T., Danilov, D., Lennartz, C. & Wenzel, W. Modeling disordered morphologies in organic semiconductors. J. Comput. Chem. 34, 2716–2725 (2013)

    2013

  17. [25]

    & Wenzel, W

    Friederich, P., Rodin, V., von Wrochem, F. & Wenzel, W. Built-In Potentials Induced by Molecular Order in Amorphous Organic Thin Films. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 1881–1887 (2018)

    2018

  18. [26]

    R., Zheng, Z., Aziz, S

    Tummala, N. R., Zheng, Z., Aziz, S. G., Coropceanu, V. & Brédas, J.-L. Static and Dynamic Energetic Disorders in the C60, PC61BM, C70, and PC71BM Fullerenes. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 3657–3662 (2015)

    2015

  19. [27]

    Becke, A. D. A new mixing of Hartree–Fock and local density functional theories. ‐functional theories. J. Chem. Phys. 98, 1372–1377 (1993)

    1993

  20. [28]

    & Ahlrichs, R

    Schäfer, A., Horn, H. & Ahlrichs, R. Fully optimized contracted Gaussian basis sets for atoms Li to Kr. J. Chem. Phys. 97, 2571–2577 (1992)

    1992

  21. [29]

    & Ahlrichs, R

    Eichkorn, K., Weigend, F., Treutler, O. & Ahlrichs, R. Auxiliary basis sets for main row atoms and transition metals and their use to approximate Coulomb potentials. Theoretical Chemistry Accounts: Theory, Computation, and Modeling (Theoretica Chimica Acta) 97, 119–124 (1997)

    1997

  22. [30]

    & Wenzel, W

    Friederich, P., Symalla, F., Meded, V., Neumann, T. & Wenzel, W. Ab Initio Treatment of Disorder Effects in Amorphous Organic Materials: Toward Parameter Free Materials Simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 10, 3720–3725 (2014)

    2014

  23. [31]

    Friederich, P. et al. Molecular Origin of the Charge Carrier Mobility in Small Molecule Organic Semiconductors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 26, 5757–5763 (2016)

    2016

  24. [32]

    & Wenzel, W

    Friederich, P., Meded, V., Symalla, F., Elstner, M. & Wenzel, W. QM/QM approach to model energy disorder in amorphous organic semiconductors. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 560–567 (2015)

    2015

  25. [33]

    Tozer, D. J. & Handy, N. C. On the determination of excitation energies using density functional theory. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics vol. 2 2117–2121 (2000)

    2000

  26. [34]

    Mesta, M. et al. Molecular-scale simulation of electroluminescence in a multilayer white organic light-emitting diode. Nature Materials vol. 12 652–658 (2013)

    2013

  27. [35]

    K., Walker, A

    Watkins, P. K., Walker, A. B. & Verschoor, G. L. B. Dynamical Monte Carlo modelling of organic solar cells: the dependence of internal quantum efficiency on morphology. Nano Lett. 5, 1814– 1818 (2005)

    2005

  28. [36]

    Symalla, F. et al. Charge Transport by Superexchange in Molecular Host-Guest Systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 276803 (2016)

    2016

  29. [37]

    Massé, A. et al. Ab initio charge-carrier mobility model for amorphous molecular semiconductors. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 93, (2016)

    2016

  30. [38]

    & Schmidt, V

    Baumeier, B., Stenzel, O., Poelking, C., Andrienko, D. & Schmidt, V. Stochastic modeling of molecular charge transport networks. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 86, (2012)

    2012

  31. [39]

    & Cheng, C.-H

    Chou, H.-H. & Cheng, C.-H. A highly efficient universal bipolar host for blue, green, and red phosphorescent OLEDs. Adv. Mater. 22, 2468–2471 (2010)

    2010

  32. [40]

    Anthopoulos, T. D. et al. Highly efficient single-layer dendrimer light-emitting diodes with balanced charge transport. Applied Physics Letters vol. 82 4824–4826 (2003)

    2003

  33. [41]

    & Ahlrichs, R

    Weigend, F. & Ahlrichs, R. Balanced basis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to Rn: Design and assessment of accuracy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 7, 3297–3305 (2005)

    2005

  34. [42]

    Linstrom, P. J. & Mallard, W. G. The NIST Chemistry WebBook: A Chemical Data Resource on the Internet †. J. Chem. Eng. Data 46, 1059–1063 (2001)

    2001

  35. [43]

    Finley, J., Malmqvist, P.-Å., Roos, B. O. & Serrano-Andrés, L. The multi-state CASPT2 method. Chem. Phys. Lett. 288, 299–306 (1998)

    1998

  36. [44]

    Massé, A. et al. Effects of energy correlations and superexchange on charge transport and exciton formation in amorphous molecular semiconductors: An ab initio study. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 95, (2017)

    2017

  37. [45]

    Liu, F. et al. Ab initio modeling of steady-state and time-dependent charge transport in hole-only α -NPD devices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 243301 (2016)

    2016

  38. [46]

    & Bobbert, P

    de Vries, X., Friederich, P., Wenzel, W., Coehoorn, R. & Bobbert, P. A. Full quantum treatment of charge dynamics in amorphous molecular semiconductors. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 97, 12 (2018)

    2018

  39. [47]

    & Qiu, Y

    Li, C., Duan, L., Li, H. & Qiu, Y. Universal Trap Effect in Carrier Transport of Disordered Organic Semiconductors: Transition from Shallow Trapping to Deep Trapping. J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 10651–10660 (2014)

    2014

  40. [48]

    Yousaf, K. E. & Peterson, K. A. Optimized complementary auxiliary basis sets for explicitly correlated methods: aug-cc-pVnZ orbital basis sets. Chem. Phys. Lett. 476, 303–307 (2009)

    2009

  41. [49]

    J., Cowles, D

    Travers, M. J., Cowles, D. C. & Ellison, G. B. Reinvestigation of the electron affinities of O2 and NO. Chem. Phys. Lett. 164, 449–455 (1989)

    1989

  42. [50]

    Borsenberger, P. M. & Bässler, H. Concerning the role of dipolar disorder on charge transport in molecularly doped polymers. J. Chem. Phys. 95, 5327–5331 (1991). 13 Supporting Information

    1991

  43. [51]

    Table S1: Comparison with other potential traps: N 2, CO2, H2, CH4, H2O, H2O-dimer → no comparable electron affinity as O2

    Electron affinities of potential trap materials Table S1 shows the DFT (B3-LYP/def2-QZVP) calculated electron affinities (delta SCF method) of various potential impurtiy candidates. Table S1: Comparison with other potential traps: N 2, CO2, H2, CH4, H2O, H2O-dimer → no compara...

  44. [52]

    We observe a convergence of the energy levels after few (4-7) iteration steps

    Vacuum energy levels compared to bulk energy levels Figure S1 shows the IP and EA levels of an α-NPD molecule and an O 2 molecule as computed using the Quantum Patch method using different embedding sizes. We observe a convergence of the energy levels after few (4-7) iteration...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.