Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 75 references

Exceptional Periodicity and Magic Star Algebras. I : Foundations

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Every exceptional Lie algebra except g2 sits in an infinite family of finite-dimensional 'Magic Star' algebras, which recover e6, e7 and e8 at level n=1.

desk verdict Explicit construction of non-Lie algebras extending e6-e8 is real, but the proof that inner derivations equal D is incomplete as written. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.00357 v2 pith:CX3KSRVU submitted 2019-09-01 math.RT hep-thmath-phmath.MPmath.RA

Piero Truini , Alessio Marrani , Michael Rios This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.RThep-thmath-phmath.MPmath.RA MSC 17B2517B7017B40
keywords ExceptionalperiodicityMagicStaralgebrasLieBottasymmetryfunctiongeneralizedrootsystemsnonassociativespinorialrepresentations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that every exceptional Lie algebra except g2 is the first member of an infinite family of finite-dimensional algebras, named 'Magic Star' algebras, parametrized by a level n=1,2,... The generalized root systems are defined with period N=4(n+1), so at n=1 they reduce to the ordinary roots of e6, e7 and e8 (and f4, treated in a later paper). The resulting algebras are antisymmetric but, for n>1, they are not Lie algebras: the Jacobi identity holds except when all three entries lie in the spinorial sector. The main theorem proves that the inner derivations of every Magic Star algebra are exactly its orthogonal Lie subalgebra D, so the exponentials of the adjoint action of D are automorphisms. The construction matters because it offers a finite-dimensional, non-Lie alternative to the affine and Kac-Moody extensions of e8.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the pair consisting of the generalized root set (3.1)-(3.4), with period N=4(n+1), and the asymmetry function epsilon($\alpha$,$\beta$) of Definition 4.1. The asymmetry function assigns a sign to every ordered pair of lattice elements from the root lattice L, depending on the order of the simple roots and on whether their sum is a root; it makes the bracket [x_alpha,x_beta]=epsilon($\alpha$,$\beta$)x_{$\alpha$+$\beta$} antisymmetric and controls exactly where the Jacobi identity survives. The second ingredient is the Magic Star projection, the two-dimensional projection of the generalized roots onto the plane spanned by k1-k2 and k1+k2-2k3, which organizes the roots into the six-pointed star of Fig. 1 and lets the authors recognize e6^(n) as the center of e8^(n), and e7^(n) as e6^(n) plus two opposite star points. The simple generalized roots of (3.9) give every root an integral expansion with all positive or all negative coefficients, which is what allows the algebra to be constructed by a root-system algorithm adapted from the Lie case.

What would settle it

Run a computer algebra check for n=2 on the e8 family: build the algebra from (3.1) and (4.1) with the asymmetry function of Definition 4.1, and evaluate the Jacobiator on every triple of spinorial generators. The paper's Proposition 6.1 predicts that all such Jacobiators are nonzero while any triple with an orthogonal generator gives zero; a single counterexample in either direction would refute the claimed structure at that level.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the root data of the exceptional Lie algebras e6, e7 and e8 can be Bott-periodically extended to ranks 4n+2, 4n+3 and 4n+4 (with N=4(n+1)) while preserving the star-shaped projection structure of the roots, the existence of a simple root basis with integral coefficients, and the semispinor graded structure (3.6)-(3.8). The algebra L^(n)_MS is assembled from one-dimensional root spaces and an abelian Cartan subalgebra using an antisymmetric bracket whose structure constants are the values of an asymmetry function on the root lattice. For n>1 the algebra is finite-dimensional but not of Lie type; the proof of Proposition 6.1 shows concretely that the Jacobiator does not vanish for triples of spinorial generators, while it vanishes whenever at least one generator lies in the orthogonal subalgebra D. The same proposition establishes that D is the full algebra of inner derivations, and thus that the automorphism group generated by nilpotent exponentials is the orthogonal group associated with D. This is the foundation result the paper sets out to prove.

Load-bearing premise

The entire construction rests on the premise that the generalized root sets (3.1)-(3.4), with period N=4(n+1), together with the bracket defined through the asymmetry function in (4.1), form a coherent algebraic structure for every n>1 whose only Jacobi violations are in the spinorial sector, a premise checked by case analysis rather than proved by a general theorem.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Each of e6, e7 and e8 is the level n=1 member of an infinite chain of finite-dimensional algebras of rank 4n+2, 4n+3 and 4n+4, respectively.
  • For every n>1 the Jacobi identity fails only in the all-spinorial sector, so the non-Lie nature is sharply localized and the orthogonal sector remains a genuine Lie algebra.
  • The full algebra of inner derivations of each Magic Star algebra is the orthogonal Lie subalgebra D, so the automorphism group generated by exponentials of derivations is the orthogonal group of D.
  • The generalized roots carry a mod-8 Bott-like periodicity tied to the Clifford semispinor representations, meaning the same star-shaped projection recurs at every level of the chain.
  • The framework is intended to generalize cubic Jordan algebras and Vinberg rank-3 matrix algebras, as announced in the concluding section.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension the authors do not pursue here is to treat the asymmetry function as a lattice 2-cocycle and ask whether the Magic Star bracket lifts to a genuine lattice vertex algebra whose zero modes reproduce the nonassociative product; the paper's own comparison with the twisted group ring of a vertex algebra points in that direction.
  • If the construction is coherent at every level, then e8 should not be seen as the last exceptional Lie algebra but as the first step of a periodic ladder; one could look for physical models, such as unified theories or matrix models, whose symmetry is a higher-level Magic Star algebra rather than e8.
  • The confinement of Jacobi violations to the spinorial sector suggests a possible deformation problem: adding a central extension or a modified bracket in that sector might restore the Jacobi identity while preserving the D-action, which would connect these algebras to Lie superalgebra-like structures.
  • A direct computer-algebra check for n=2 of the e8-family bracket would settle many of the deferred consistency questions, since the proof here is by case analysis rather than an overarching theorem.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces 'Magic Star algebras' LMS, a family of finite-dimensional algebras parametrized by n, with N=4(n+1), whose root data generalize the root systems of e6, e7, and e8; at n=1 the usual exceptional Lie algebras are recovered, while for n>1 the algebras are finite-dimensional and non-Lie. The construction is explicit: generalized roots are defined in Section 3, the bracket is fixed in Section 4 via an asymmetry function, and Section 5 establishes basic properties of that function. Section 6 states and proves that for n>1 the inner derivations of LMS are exactly its orthogonal Lie subalgebra D, and that exponentials of these derivations are automorphisms. The paper also discusses Bott-periodicity, the Magic Star projection, and future work on gradings and Jordan structures.

Significance. If the main structural claim is established, this is a genuinely interesting contribution to non-Lie generalizations of exceptional Lie algebras: it gives an explicit, parameter-free, countably infinite family of finite-dimensional algebras that recover e6, e7, and e8 at n=1, with a clear root-theoretic construction and a concrete bracket. The root counts in the tables pass consistency checks, and Propositions 3.2, 3.3, and 3.5 are coherent and useful. The advertised identification of the inner derivation algebra with the orthogonal subalgebra D would be a strong structural result. The paper is self-contained in its central definitions and does not rely on fitted parameters or external physical input, which is a real strength. However, the proof of Proposition 6.1 has a load-bearing gap in the 'only if' direction, so the main theorem is not established as written.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 6, Proposition 6.1] The 'only if' direction of Proposition 6.1 is not proved. The proof begins with 'By the linearity of the adjoint action it is sufficient to prove the proposition for basis elements', but the derivation condition is linear in the element x only in the sense that the set of x for which ad_x is a derivation is an intersection of kernels of linear maps; it is a linear subspace. Showing that each individual spinor basis element x_alpha is not a derivation does not imply that no nontrivial linear combination s = d + sum a_alpha x_alpha is a derivation, since cancellations among the a_alpha are not excluded. The final displayed construction with the six indices {j,l,m,r,s,t} shows only that for each single x_alpha there exist beta and gamma with a nonzero Jacobiator; it does not establish nondegeneracy of the trilinear Jacobiator form on the spinor sector. This is load-bearing because the equality Der_inner(LMS)=D is the central structural theorem advertised in the abstract and in Section 6. The proof needs an additional argument, for example using the root grading to isolate a highest-degree component, or a direct rank computation of the relevant matrix, showing that no nonzero spinor combination satisfies the derivation condition.
  2. [Section 6, end of Proposition 6.1] The sentence 'First of all we notice that ad_x is nilpotent' is false for general x in D. For example, any nonzero h in the Cartan subalgebra H acts diagonally on the root spaces with eigenvalues (alpha,h), so ad_h is semisimple and not nilpotent. The subsequent exponential argument as written covers only nilpotent derivations. The automorphism claim can be repaired by using the standard fact that for any derivation delta of a finite-dimensional algebra, exp(delta) is an automorphism, with no nilpotence assumption; this is a local fix, but the current proof is not valid for all x in D.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 4, after Eq. (4.1)] The statement that the algebras 'are Lie algebras only for n=1 ... whereas for n>2 they are not Lie algebras' appears to contain a typo. The construction in Proposition 6.1 yields Jacobi violations for all n>1, and the explicit example before Eq. (6.5) requires only N>8, i.e. n>1. Please correct the bound to n>1.
  2. [Section 6, case c4] In the proof of Proposition 6.1, case c4 refers to 'Proposition 3.9', but the correct reference is Proposition 3.5, which states the relevant scalar-product criterion for roots.
  3. [Table 2 caption] There is a duplicated word in the caption: 'in in table 2' should read 'in table 2'.
  4. [Section 7] Several advertised structural results, including the gradings, Jordan-pair structures, and the detailed analysis of Jacobi-violating subsectors, are deferred to [EP2]–[EP4]. The present paper should make clear in the introduction or conclusion that those statements are not established here.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Magic Star construction is self-contained and the derivation theorem is proved from explicit definitions.

full rationale

The paper's central construction is not circular. Generalized roots are defined explicitly in Eqs. (3.1)-(3.4) by periodizing with N=4(n+1), and the algebra product is fixed by the asymmetry function in Definition 4.1 with no fitted parameters; the n=1 recovery of e6, e7, e8 is presented and used only as a consistency check, not as an input to the construction. Proposition 6.1, identifying inner derivations with the orthogonal subalgebra D, is derived from the stated definitions and the properties of the asymmetry function proved in Section 5; no step in that derivation reduces to the conclusion by definition. Self-citations such as [TRM17], [TRM18], and [EP2] appear as background, motivation, or deferred applications, but they do not supply any theorem on which the main derivation depends. The only substantive issue found is a proof gap in the 'only if' direction of Proposition 6.1: after showing each individual spinor root generator has a nonzero Jacobiator with some pair, the proof invokes linearity to conclude that any nonzero spinor combination cannot be a derivation, which is not logically valid. That is a correctness or completeness concern, not a circularity, because the target statement is not assumed in the proof and the construction itself remains independent.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted or numeric free parameters appear; the level n indexes the family. The main ad hoc choice is the period 4 in N=4(n+1), which fixes the entire construction. Standard Lie-theoretic facts about D_N are assumed, and the asymmetry function is imported from Kac and de Graaf.

assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper The generalized root sets in (3.1)-(3.4), with N=4(n+1), are the correct generalization of the exceptional root systems.
    This period is inspired by Bott periodicity but is chosen by hand; no uniqueness or completeness theorem is given.
  • standard math Standard facts about D_N root systems, Weyl reflections, and simple root coordinates apply to the vector part Phi_O.
    Used in Propositions 3.2, 3.3, and 3.5 for closure and root length computations.
  • standard math The asymmetry function from Definition 4.1 satisfies the cocycle identities in Proposition 5.1.
    These identities are proved using the Kac and de Graaf lattice cocycle construction and are essential for the bracket to be antisymmetric.
  • ad hoc to paper The bracket (4.1), including [x_alpha,x_beta]=0 when alpha+beta is not a root, defines an algebra whose spinorial sector has non-trivial products for every n>1.
    Closure is verified through Propositions 3.5 and 6.2, but no general theorem establishes that this is the only coherent bracket.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exceptional Periodicity and Magic Star Algebras. I : Foundations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CX3KSRVU

@misc{pith2026190900357,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exceptional Periodicity and Magic Star Algebras. I : Foundations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CX3KSRVU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.00357}
}
abstract

We introduce and start investigating the properties of countably infinite, periodic chains of finite dimensional generalizations of the exceptional Lie algebras: each exceptional Lie algebra (but $\mathbf{g}_{2}$) is part of an infinite family of finite dimensional algebras, which we name "Magic Star" algebras. These algebras have remarkable similarities with many characterizing features of the exceptional Lie algebras.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.00357 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The Magic Star, in the plane coordinatized by ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Super Yang-Mills, division algebras and triality

    A. Anastasiou, L. Borsten, M.J. Duff, L.J. Hughes, S. Nagy, Super Yang-Mills, division algebras and triality, JHEP 1408 (2014) 080, arXiv:1309.0546 [hep-th] . A. Anastasiou, L. Borsten, M.J. Duff, L.J. Hughes, S. Nagy, A magic pyramid of supergravities, JHEP 1404 (2014) 178, arXiv:1312.6523 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2014

  2. [2]

    The Mile High Magic Pyramid

    A. Anastasiou, L. Borsten, M.J. Duff, A. Marrani, S. Nagy, The Mile High Magic Pyramid, Contemp. Math. 721 (2019) 1-27, arXiv:1711.08476 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  3. [3]

    D-branes, Matrix Theory and K-homology

    T. Asakawa, S. Sugimoto and S. Terashima, D -branes, Matrix Theory and K -homology, JHEP 0203, 034 (2002), hep-th/0108085

    work page Pith review arXiv 2002

  4. [4]

    Artin and J

    M. Artin and J. J. Zhang, Noncommutative projective schemes, Adv. Math. 109 (2), 228-287 (1994)

    work page 1994

  5. [5]

    Baez, The octonions, Bull

    J. Baez, The octonions, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 39:2 (2002) 145-205; Errata, ibid. 42 (2005) 213; math/0105155v4 [math.RA]

    arXiv 2002

  6. [6]

    Banks, W

    T. Banks, W. Fischler, S. H. Shenker and L. Susskind, M \ Theory as a Matrix Model: A Conjecture, Phys. Rev. D55, 5112-5128 (1997), hep-th/9610043

    arXiv 1997

  7. [7]

    Borsten, M.J

    L. Borsten, M.J. Du , A. Marrani, W. Rubens, On the Black-Hole/Qubit Correspondence, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 126, 37 (2011), arXiv:1101.3559 [hep-th] . L. Borsten, M.J. Duff, P. L\' e vay, The black-hole/qubit correspondence: an up-to-date review, Class. Quant. Grav. 29, 224008 (2012), arXiv:1206.3166 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2011

  8. [8]

    Bossard, A

    G. Bossard, A. Kleinschmidt, J. Palmkvist, C. N. Pope and E. Sezgin, Beyond E _ 11 , JHEP 1705 (2017) 020, arXiv:1703.01305 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2017

Show all 75 references
  1. [9]

    Bourbaki Groups et Alg\`ebres de Lie, Hermann, Paris 1968

    N. Bourbaki Groups et Alg\`ebres de Lie, Hermann, Paris 1968

    1968

  2. [10]

    R. B. Brown, Groups of type E _ 7 , J. Reine Angew. Math. 236, 79 (1969)

    1969

  3. [11]

    Kim and A

    B. Kim and A. Schwarz, Formulation of M(atrix) model in terms of octonions (unpublished)

  4. [12]

    Carter, R. W. Simple Groups of Lie Type, Wiley-Interscience, New-York, 1989

    1989

  5. [13]

    Cossu, M

    G. Cossu, M. D'Elia, A. Di Giacomo, B. Lucini, C. Pica, Confinement: G _ 2 \ group case, PoSLAT2007, 296 (2007), arXiv:0710.0481 [hep-lat]

    2007 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Connes, M

    A. Connes, M. R. Douglas and A. Schwarz, Noncommutative geometry and matrix theory: compactification on tori, JHEP 9802, 003 (1998), hep-th/9711162

    1998 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Cremmer and B

    E. Cremmer and B. Julia, The N =8 \ Supergravity Theory. 1. The Lagrangian, Phys. Lett. B80, 48 (1978). E. Cremmer and B. Julia, The SO(8) \ Supergravity, Nucl. Phys. B159, 141 (1979)

    1978

  8. [16]

    Connes : Noncommutative Geometry", Boston, Academic Press (1994)

    A. Connes : Noncommutative Geometry", Boston, Academic Press (1994)

    1994

  9. [17]

    Connes, Noncommutative geometry and reality, J

    A. Connes, Noncommutative geometry and reality, J. Math. Phys. 36, 6194 (1995)

    1995

  10. [18]

    Connes, Gravity coupled with matter and the foundation of noncommutative geometry, Comm

    A. Connes, Gravity coupled with matter and the foundation of noncommutative geometry, Comm. Math. Phys. 155, 109 (1996)

    1996

  11. [19]

    Chevalley and R

    C. Chevalley and R. D. Schafer, The Exceptional Simple Lie Algebras F_ 4 \ and E_ 6 , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 35 (2), 137-141 (1950)

    1950

  12. [20]

    Cayley, On Jacobi's elliptic functions, in reply to the Rev

    A. Cayley, On Jacobi's elliptic functions, in reply to the Rev. Brice Bronwin; and on quaternions, Philosophical Magazine 26, 208-211 (1845)

  13. [21]

    Damour and M

    T. Damour and M. Henneaux, E_ 10 , BE_ 10 \ and arithmetical chaos in superstring cosmology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4749--4752 (2001), hep-th/0012172 . T. Damour, M. Henneaux, B. Julia and H. Nicolai, Hyperbolic Kac-Moody algebras and chaos in Kaluza-Klein models, Phys. Lett. B5...

    2001 arXiv

  14. [22]

    de Graaf : Lie Algebras: Theory and Algorithms" (North-Holland Mathematical Library 56, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2000)

    W.A. de Graaf : Lie Algebras: Theory and Algorithms" (North-Holland Mathematical Library 56, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2000)

    2000

  15. [23]

    D'Auria, S

    R. D'Auria, S. Ferrara, M.A. Lledo, V.S. Varadarajan, Spinor algebras, J.Geom.Phys. 40 (2001) 101-128, hep-th/0010124

    2001 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Distler and S

    J. Distler and S. Garibaldi, There is no Theory of Everything" inside E_ 8 , Comm. Math. Phys. 298 (2010), 419, arXiv:0905.2658 [math.RT]

    2010 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Truini, A

    P. Truini, A. Marrani, M. Rios, Exceptional Periodicity and Magic Star Algebras. II : Gradings and HT -Algebras ; to appear

  18. [26]

    Truini, W

    P. Truini, W. De Graaf, A. Marrani, Exceptional Periodicity and Magic Star Algebras. III : The Algebra and the Derivations of HT -Algebras ; in preparation

  19. [27]

    Truini, W

    P. Truini, W. De Graaf, A. Marrani, Exceptional Periodicity and Magic Star Algebras. IV : Cubic T-Algebras; in preparation

  20. [28]

    Coldea, D.A

    R. Coldea, D.A. Tennant, E.M. Wheeler, E. Wawrzynska, D. Prabhakaran, M. Telling, K. Habicht, P. Smibidl, and K. Kiefer, Quantum criticality in an Ising chain: experimental evidence for emergent E _ 8 \ symmetry, Science 327, 177 (2010). D. Borthwick and S. Garibaldi, Did a 1-...

    2010 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Marrani, C.-X

    A. Marrani, C.-X. Qiu, S.-Y. D. Shih, A. Tagliaferro, B. Zumino, Freudenthal Gauge Theory, JHEP 1303, 132 (2013), arXiv:1208.0013 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Ferrara and R

    S. Ferrara and R. Kallosh, Creation of Matter in the Universe and Groups of Type E _ 7 , JHEP 1112, 096 (2011), arXiv:1110.4048 [hep-th] . S. Ferrara, R. Kallosh, and A. Marrani, Degeneration of Groups of Type E _ 7 \ and Minimal Coupling in Supergravity, JHEP 1206, 074 (2012)...

    2011 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Gross, J

    D. Gross, J. Harvey, E. Martinec and R. Rohm, Heterotic string, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 (6), 502-505 (1985)

    1985

  24. [32]

    Gell-Mann, The Eightfold Way: A Theory of strong interaction symmetry, Synchrotron Laboratory Report CTSL-20, California Inst

    M. Gell-Mann, The Eightfold Way: A Theory of strong interaction symmetry, Synchrotron Laboratory Report CTSL-20, California Inst. of Tech., Pasadena (1961)

    1961

  25. [33]

    Gell-Mann, A Schematic Model of Baryons and Mesons, Phys

    M. Gell-Mann, A Schematic Model of Baryons and Mesons, Phys. Lett. 8 (3), 214-215 (1964)

    1964

  26. [34]

    G\" u rsey, P

    F. G\" u rsey, P. Ramond and P. Sikivie, A universal gauge theory model based on E_ 6 , Phys. Lett. B60 (2), 177-180 (1976)

    1976

  27. [35]

    u naydin, G. Sierra, P. K. Townsend, Exceptional Supergravity Theories and the Magic Square, Phys. Lett. B133 , 72 (1983). M. G\

    M. G\" u naydin, G. Sierra, P. K. Townsend, Exceptional Supergravity Theories and the Magic Square, Phys. Lett. B133 , 72 (1983). M. G\" u naydin, G. Sierra and P. K. Townsend, The Geometry of N =2 \ Maxwell-Einstein Supergravity and Jordan Algebras, Nucl. Phys. B242, 244 (1984)

    1983

  28. [36]

    Holland, P

    K. Holland, P. Minkowski, M. Pepe and U. J. Wiese, Exceptional confinement in G _ 2 \ gauge theory, Nucl. Phys. B668, 207 (2003), hep-lat/0302023

    2003 arXiv

  29. [37]

    G. T. Horowitz and L. Susskind, Bosonic M \ Theory, J. Math. Phys. 42, 3152 (2001), hep-th/0012037

    2001 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Hull and P

    C. Hull and P. K. Townsend, Unity of Superstring Dualities, Nucl. Phys. B438, 109 (1995), hep-th/9410167

    1995 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Humphreys: Introduction to Lie Algebras and Representation Theory" (Springer-Verlag New York Inc., New York, 1972)

    J.E. Humphreys: Introduction to Lie Algebras and Representation Theory" (Springer-Verlag New York Inc., New York, 1972)

    1972

  32. [40]

    P. M. Ho and Y. S. Wu, Noncommutative Geometry and D -branes, Phys. Lett. B398, 52-60 (1997), hep-th/9611233

    1997 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Jordan, J

    P. Jordan, J. von Neumann and E. P. Wigner, On an algebraic generalization of the quantum mechanical formalism, Ann. Math. 35 (1934) no. 1, 29--64

    1934

  34. [42]

    Kac : Infinite Dimensional Lie Algebras", third edition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990)

    V.G. Kac : Infinite Dimensional Lie Algebras", third edition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990)

    1990

  35. [43]

    Keating, N.Linden and Z

    J.P. Keating, N.Linden and Z. Rudnick, Random Matrix Theory, The exceptional Lie groups, and L-functions, J. Phys. A36 no. 12, 2933 (special RMT volume) (2003)

    2003

  36. [44]

    Krauth and M

    W. Krauth and M. Staudacher, Yang-Mills integrals for orthogonal, symplectic and exceptional groups, Nucl. Phys. B584, 641 (2000), hep-th/0004076

    2000 arXiv

  37. [45]

    A. G. Lisi, An exceptionally simple theory of everything, arXiv:0711.0770 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    Notes Math

    O.Loos : Jordan Pairs", Lect. Notes Math. 460, (Springer, 1975)

    1975

  39. [47]

    Ferrara, A

    S. Ferrara, A. Marrani, B. Zumino, Jordan Pairs, E_ 6 \ and U -Duality in Five Dimensions , J. Phys. A46 (2013) 065402, arXiv:1208.0347 [math-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Marrani and P

    A. Marrani and P. Truini, Exceptional Lie Algebras, SU(3) \ and Jordan Pairs Part 2: Zorn-type Representations, J. Phys. A47 (2014) 265202, arXiv:1403.5120 [math-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Marrani and P

    A. Marrani and P. Truini, Exceptional Lie Algebras at the very Foundations of Space and Time, p Adic Ultra. Anal. Appl. 8 (2016) no.1, 68-86, arXiv:1506.08576 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Marrani and P

    A. Marrani and P. Truini, Sextonions, Zorn Matrices, and e _ 7 1 2 , Lett. Math. Phys. 107 (2017) no.10, 1859-1875, arXiv:1506.04604 [math.RA]

    2017 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Madore, Noncommutative Geometry for Pedestrians , Lecture given at the International School of Gravitation, Erice, gr-qc/9906059

    J. Madore, Noncommutative Geometry for Pedestrians , Lecture given at the International School of Gravitation, Erice, gr-qc/9906059

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    Marrani, G

    A. Marrani, G. Pradisi, F. Riccioni and L. Romano, Non-Supersymmetric Magic Theories and Ehlers Truncations, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A32 (2017) no.19-20, 1750120, arXiv:1701.03031 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Marrani and L

    A. Marrani and L. Romano, Orbits in Non-Supersymmetric Magic Theories, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 2019 (in press), arXiv:1906.05830 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Freudenthal, Beziehungen der E_ 7 \ und E_ 8 \ zur oktavenebene I-II, Nederl

    H. Freudenthal, Beziehungen der E_ 7 \ und E_ 8 \ zur oktavenebene I-II, Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. Proc. Ser. 57 (1954) 218--230. J. Tits, Interpr\' e tation g\' e ometriques de groupes de Lie simples compacts de la classe E , M\' e m. Acad. Roy. Belg. Sci 29 (1955) 3. H. Freude...

    1954

  47. [55]

    Mukai, Simple Lie algebra and Legendre variety , Nagoya S\= u ri Forum, 3 (1996), 1-12

    S. Mukai, Simple Lie algebra and Legendre variety , Nagoya S\= u ri Forum, 3 (1996), 1-12

    1996

  48. [56]

    Nicolai, The integrability of N =16 \ supergravity, Phys

    H. Nicolai, The integrability of N =16 \ supergravity, Phys. Lett. B194, 402 (1987). R. P. Geroch, A method for generating solutions of Einstein's equations, J. Math. Phys. 12, 918--924 (1971). R. P. Geroch, A method for generating new solutions of Einstein's equation. 2, J. M...

    1987 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Pengpan and P

    T. Pengpan and P. Ramond, M(ysterious) Patterns in SO(9) , Phys. Rept. 315, 137-152 (1998), hep-th/9808190

    1998 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Ramond, Exceptional Groups and Physics, Plenary Talk delivered at the Conference Groupe 24, Paris, July 2002, arXiv:hep-th/0301050v1

    P. Ramond, Exceptional Groups and Physics, Plenary Talk delivered at the Conference Groupe 24, Paris, July 2002, arXiv:hep-th/0301050v1

    2002 arXiv

  51. [59]

    M. Rios, A. Marrani, D. Chester, Geometry of exceptional super Yang-Mills theories, Phys. Rev. D99 (2019) no.4, 046004, arXiv:1811.06101 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  52. [60]

    M. Rios, A. Marrani, D. Chester, Exceptional Super Yang-Mills in 27+3 \ and Worldvolume M-Theory, arXiv:1906.10709 [hep-th]

    1906 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Sati, OP ^ 2 Bundles in M -Theory, Commun

    H. Sati, OP ^ 2 Bundles in M -Theory, Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 3 (2009) 495, arXiv:0807.4899 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Sati, On the geometry of the supermultiplet in M -theory, Int

    H. Sati, On the geometry of the supermultiplet in M -theory, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 8 (2011) 1, arXiv:0909.4737 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Smolin, The exceptional Jordan algebra and the matrix string, hep-th/0104050

    L. Smolin, The exceptional Jordan algebra and the matrix string, hep-th/0104050

    arXiv

  56. [64]

    R. J. Szabo, D -Branes, Tachyons and K -Homology, Mod. Phys. Lett. A17, 2297 (2002), hep-th/0209210

    2002 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Truini, Exceptional Lie Algebras, SU(3) \ and Jordan Pairs, Pacific J

    P. Truini, Exceptional Lie Algebras, SU(3) \ and Jordan Pairs, Pacific J. Math. 260, 227 (2012), arXiv:1112.1258 [math-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  58. [66]

    P. Truini, Vertex operators for an expanding universe, invited paper in Symmetries and Order: Algebraic Methods in Many Body Systems , Yale 5-6 October 2018, in honor of Francesco Iachello, on the occasion of his retirement; arXiv:1901.07916 [physics.gen-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Truini et al.; to appear

    P. Truini et al.; to appear

  60. [68]

    Truini, M

    P. Truini, M. Rios, A. Marrani, The Magic Star of Exceptional Periodicity, Contemp. Math. 721 (2019), 277-297, arXiv:1711.07881 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Marrani, P

    A. Marrani, P. Truini, M. Rios, The Magic of Being Exceptional, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1194 (2019) no.1, 012075, arXiv:1811.11208 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Truini, A

    P. Truini, A. Marrani, M. Rios, Magic Star and Exceptional Periodicity: an approach to Quantum Gravity, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1194 (2019) no.1, 012106, arXiv:1811.11202 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  63. [71]

    A. G. Tumanov and P. West, E_ 11 \ in 11D, Phys. Lett. B758 (2016) 278, 1601.03974 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Vinberg, The theory of Convex Homogeneous Cones, in Transaction of the Moscow Mathematical Society for the year 1963, 340-403, American Mathematical Society, Providence RI 1965

    E.B. Vinberg, The theory of Convex Homogeneous Cones, in Transaction of the Moscow Mathematical Society for the year 1963, 340-403, American Mathematical Society, Providence RI 1965

    1963

  65. [73]

    Vogan, The character table for E _ 8 , Notices of the AMS 54 (2007), no

    D. Vogan, The character table for E _ 8 , Notices of the AMS 54 (2007), no. 9, 1022

    2007

  66. [74]

    Witten, String theory dynamics in various dimensions, Nuclear Physics B443 (1), 85-126 (1995), hep-th/9503124

    E. Witten, String theory dynamics in various dimensions, Nuclear Physics B443 (1), 85-126 (1995), hep-th/9503124

    1995 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Zweig, An SU(3) \ Model for Strong Interaction Symmetry and its Breaking: II, CERN Report No

    G. Zweig, An SU(3) \ Model for Strong Interaction Symmetry and its Breaking: II, CERN Report No. 8419/TH.401 (1964)

    1964

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.