Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 55 references

Motion of objects embedded in lipid bilayer membranes: advection and effective viscosity

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read An interfacial regularized Stokeslet scheme predicts the motion of arbitrary rigid bodies in flowing lipid-bilayer membranes and yields the dilute-limit effective viscosity $\eta_m(1+\alpha\phi)$.

desk verdict A solid, useful extension of the authors' regularized Stokeslet method; the effective-viscosity results are credible and the paper deserves a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.02066 v1 pith:ZOBL3DWE submitted 2019-09-04 physics.bio-ph cond-mat.softphysics.chem-ph

Brian A. Camley , Frank L.H. Brown This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.bio-phcond-mat.softphysics.chem-ph
keywords lipidbilayermembranesSaffman-DelbrückmodelregularizedStokesletseffectivemembraneviscosityintrinsichydrodynamicsFaxénrelationshipsrigidoligomers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper extends the interfacial regularized Stokeslet method, which previously computed drag and diffusion of membrane-embedded objects, to predict how such objects are advected and rotated by an externally imposed membrane flow. The central claim is that the same calculation yields the dilute-limit effective membrane viscosity, $\eta_{\rm eff}^m = \eta_m(1+\alpha\phi)$, with the intrinsic viscosity $\alpha$ obtained from the orientationally averaged force dipole (stresslet) exerted by a single object. In the small-object limit the method confirms the analytical prediction that circular inclusions give $\alpha\to 2$, and it extends the calculation to arbitrary shapes and to rigid linear oligomers, whose intrinsic viscosity increases with chain length. A sympathetic reader would care because this provides a numerical route to compute protein motion in complex flows where approximate Faxén relations fail, and it suggests that membrane viscosity measurements could report on protein oligomerization state.

What carries the argument

The central object is the interfacial regularized Stokeslet: the Saffman-Delbrück membrane's Oseen tensor, regularized by replacing point forces with Gaussian 'blobs' so that a solid body can be discretized as a cluster of constrained fluid regions. The argument is carried by the linear system that enforces rigid-body motion at every blob, the vanishing of total constraint force and torque, and the subsequent construction of the stresslet from the blob forces. For anisotropic objects, the intrinsic viscosity is obtained from the orientational average of the stresslet, computed either by repeated rotations or analytically through the grand resistance matrix, which also provides an order-of-magnitude speedup.

What would settle it

A many-body numerical experiment—randomly dispersing rigid disks or rods in a sheared membrane at several small area fractions and measuring how the averaged stresslet and effective viscosity grow with $\phi$—would settle whether the single-particle dipole law holds; if the slope $\alpha$ changes with $\phi$ or with multipole truncation, the derivation fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that force- and torque-free rigid bodies embedded in a flowing bilayer can be fully characterized by solving a linear system for the constraint forces on a cluster of regularized blobs: the membrane velocity at each blob must equal $\mathbf{U} + \boldsymbol{\Omega}\times\mathbf{R}_m$, while the sum of blob forces and torques vanishes. The solution gives the body's translational velocity $\mathbf{U}$ and angular velocity $\boldsymbol{\Omega}$ in any ambient field, reducing to the known Faxén relations when the flow is smooth and the body is small compared to the Saffman-Delbrück length, and deviating from them when the flow varies on the scale of the body. Under a pure shear, the same forces define the stresslet $S_{ij} = \frac12\sum_n (R_{n,i} g_j[\mathbf{R}_n] + R_{n,j} g_i[\mathbf{R}_n])$, whose orientational average satisfies $S_{ij} = -\alpha\eta_m A_p(\partial_i v_j + \partial_j v_i)$; inserting this into the averaged membrane response yields the Einstein-type correction $\eta_{\rm eff}^m = \eta_m(1+\alpha\phi)$. Numerically, $\alpha\to 2$ for small cylinders, matching the analytical result of Ref. 6, and grows with $a/L_{\rm sd}$; rigid linear oligomers display larger $\alpha$ than monomers at the same area fraction.

Load-bearing premise

Everything about the effective-viscosity formula rests on the dilute-limit assumption that many inclusions act only as independent single-particle force dipoles, with no higher multipoles and no particle-particle correlations; if those contribute at the area fractions of interest, $\eta_{\rm eff}^m = \eta_m(1+\alpha\phi)$ would be inaccurate.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In smooth, slowly varying ambient flows the scheme reproduces the approximate Faxén relations, so it provides a quantitative check on when those approximations are valid.
  • In rapidly varying flows, the Faxén truncation can produce unphysical oscillatory trajectories, while the regularized-Stokeslet trajectory remains smooth, so particle paths can be computed reliably in complex flow fields.
  • For dilute suspensions of small cylindrical inclusions the effective membrane viscosity is $\eta_m(1+2\phi)$, in agreement with the analytical prediction of Ref. 6.
  • For rigid linear oligomers at fixed area fraction, the intrinsic viscosity increases with chain length, with a stronger relative effect when $a/L_{\rm sd}$ is larger.
  • The grand resistance matrix formulation permits analytic orientational averaging, reducing the cost of the effective-viscosity computation by roughly an order of magnitude.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The persistence of the unexplained 2/3 factor between the two prior analytical predictions across all $a/L_{\rm sd}$ suggests it is a systematic convention difference in how the induced force dipole is defined, not a small-particle artifact; identifying that convention would reconcile the two definitions.
  • Because the method computes the full blob force distribution, the same machinery could handle externally forced or self-propelled inclusions by relaxing the zero-force/zero-torque constraints, and finite-concentration systems by adding pair interactions and higher multipoles—extensions the paper does not make.
  • If chain-length dependence of $\alpha$ is robust, membrane shear-viscosity measurements in systems with controlled protein clustering could serve as a shape-sensitive probe of oligomerization state once the experimental precision the paper calls for is reached.
  • The paper's caveat that elongated particles may leave the linear regime at smaller area fractions than compact ones is testable: a finite-$\phi$ simulation of sheared rigid rods should show where $\eta_{\rm eff}^m/\eta_m - 1$ becomes nonlinear in $\phi$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends the interfacial regularized Stokeslet (RS) method developed by the authors to compute the translational and rotational velocities of force- and torque-free solid objects embedded in a lipid bilayer membrane and advected by an ambient surface flow (Eqs. 3–5). The method is validated by recovering, in the limit a ≪ L_sd, the approximate Faxén relations of Oppenheimer and Diamant (Eqs. 11–12) for cylinders and by the stationary-cylinder test in extensional flow. The same stresslet machinery is used to compute the dilute-limit effective membrane viscosity η_eff^m = η_m(1 + αφ) from the orientationally averaged single-particle force dipole (Appendix A). For cylinders, α → 2 as a/L_sd → 0, consistent with Oppenheimer and Diamant; α grows with a/L_sd, and with a rescaling factor of 2/3 the results agree with Henle and Levine. For rigid linear oligomers of circular monomers, α increases with oligomer length. The grand resistance matrix formulation in Appendix B provides an independent cross-check, agreeing with the direct stresslet calculation to 2×10^-5.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper provides a general numerical tool for membrane hydrodynamics beyond simple cylinders, applicable to arbitrary shapes and spatially varying flows. It gives a route to compute membrane Einstein corrections for non-circular inclusions, and predicts a measurable dependence of membrane effective viscosity on protein oligomerization state. Strengths include: the method is validated against the known Oppenheimer-Diamant limit; the effective-viscosity calculation rests on explicitly stated dilute-limit assumptions (single-particle stresslet, no correlations) that are the standard first-order-in-φ conditions; an independent grand-resistance-matrix cross-check agrees to 2×10^-5; and the code is publicly available. The paper is honest about limitations (range of area fractions not quantified, 2/3 rescaling not understood).

minor comments (6)
  1. [Section IV / Discussion] The statement that the Henle-Levine predictions are 'confirmed' is stronger than the evidence supports, given that agreement requires an unexplained factor of 2/3; I suggest rewording to 'reproduced up to an overall factor of 2/3'.
  2. [Section IV] There is a typo in the sentence 'extending the original Oppenheimer Diamant calculation to determine the the effective viscosity'; delete the duplicated 'the'.
  3. [Figure 5] The oligomer intrinsic-viscosity results in Fig. 5 are presented without error bars; adding uncertainties from the spacing extrapolation and orientation averaging would help the reader judge the significance of the increase with oligomer length.
  4. [Section II / Figures 2–5] The convergence study is described only in figure captions; a representative plot or table showing the extrapolation to zero blob spacing for one test case would strengthen the numerical claims.
  5. [Section IV / Discussion] The statement 'The origin of the factor of 2/3 is not understood' (Section IV) is in tension with the Discussion's remark that this factor 'was previously attributed to the different definitions of effective viscosity'; please clarify whether a definitional explanation is accepted.
  6. [Appendix B, Eq. (B7)] In Eq. (B7), the notation '(G H)' is not defined; writing the block matrices explicitly would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the effective-viscosity coefficient is computed from the numerically solved stresslet and benchmarked against independent analytical results.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained. The interfacial regularized Stokeslet method (Sec. II) solves the quasi-2D Stokes equations for force- and torque-free rigid bodies, and α is obtained directly from the computed single-particle stresslet (Sec. IV, steps 1-6), not fitted to any viscosity datum. The dilute-limit relation ηeff_m = ηm(1+αφ) is derived in Appendix A from the stated dipole-truncation and orientation-averaging assumptions, with the effective viscosity identified through the long-wavelength response T_eff (Eqs. A7-A9); this is a derivation, not a redefinition of the outcome. The agreement with Oppenheimer and Diamant's α→2 is an independent analytical benchmark, and the paper explicitly acknowledges that the same definition of effective viscosity makes agreement unsurprising. The 2/3 rescaling of Henle and Levine is disclosed as an empirical, unexplained factor and does not enter the central computation. Appendix B provides an independent grand-resistance-matrix route to the same α, agreeing to 2e-5. All load-bearing assumptions (dilute φ, no correlations, neglect of higher multipoles, uniform orientation) are explicitly stated. No self-citation is used to justify the central result, and no prediction reduces by construction to a fitted parameter.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to produce the central predictions: the blob spacing and regularization are discretization parameters that are extrapolated to zero, and the intrinsic viscosity alpha is computed from the Stokes equations rather than fitted. The 2/3 factor used when comparing to Ref. 26 is an auxiliary rescaling, not part of the derivation. The main axioms are the Saffman-Delbrück model, the rigid-blob representation, and the dilute-limit force-dipole truncation.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Saffman-Delbrück quasi-2D membrane hydrodynamics: the membrane is described as a two-dimensional viscous fluid coupled to bulk fluids on either side, with Oseen tensor given by Eq. 2.
    This is the physical model inherited from Ref. 6 and earlier work; all computations assume it.
  • domain assumption Solid bodies can be represented as fluid regions constrained to undergo rigid-body motion, with constraint forces acting on the homogeneous fluid (Sec. II).
    This is the regularized Stokeslet representation, established in Refs. 24 and 25, and used here without re-derivation.
  • standard math Creeping-flow linearity: the total velocity is the sum of ambient flow and blob-induced flow (Eq. 3), and force and torque-free conditions (Eq. 5) produce a unique solution.
    Linear Stokes equations and superposition principle.
  • domain assumption Dilute limit: particle-particle correlations and higher-order multipoles beyond the force dipole are neglected in the effective-viscosity derivation (Appendix A, Eqs. A1 to A2).
    This is the standard Einstein-correction approximation; the paper assumes it is valid for phi much less than 1.
  • domain assumption Uniform orientation distribution for anisotropic inclusions: the intrinsic viscosity is obtained from the orientationally averaged stresslet (Appendix A).
    The paper assumes randomly oriented particles; any experimental alignment would change the result.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Motion of objects embedded in lipid bilayer membranes: advection and effective viscosity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZOBL3DWE

@misc{pith2026190902066,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Motion of objects embedded in lipid bilayer membranes: advection and effective viscosity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZOBL3DWE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.02066}
}
read the original abstract

An interfacial regularized Stokeslet scheme is presented to predict the motion of solid bodies (e.g. proteins or gel-phase domains) embedded within flowing lipid bilayer membranes. The approach provides a numerical route to calculate velocities and angular velocities in complex flow fields that are not amenable to simple Fax\'en-like approximations. Additionally, when applied to shearing motions, the calculations yield predictions for the effective surface viscosity of dilute rigid body-laden membranes. In the case of cylindrical proteins, effective viscosity calculations are compared to two prior analytical predictions from the literature. Effective viscosity predictions for a dilute suspension of rod-shaped objects in the membrane are also presented.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.02066 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Effect of an embedded force- and torque-free circular object [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Computation of object motion in external flow field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. In both [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Comparison between numerical RS results and literature predictions for suspensions of cylindrical particles (with radius [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Intrinsic viscosity of rigid linear oligomers of circular objects [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    R. B. Gennis. Biomembranes: Molecular Structure and Function . Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989

    work page 1989

  2. [2]

    M. J. Saxton and K. Jacobson. Single particle tracking: Applications to membrane dynamics. Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure , 26: 0 373--399, 1997

    work page 1997

  3. [3]

    Saffman and M

    P G. Saffman and M. Delbr\"uck . Brownian motion in biological membranes. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA , 72: 0 3111, 1975

    work page 1975

  4. [4]

    Brownian motion in thin sheets of viscous fluid

    PG Saffman. Brownian motion in thin sheets of viscous fluid. Journal of Fluid Mechanics , 73 0 (4): 0 593, 1976

    work page 1976

  5. [5]

    Hughes, B A

    B D. Hughes, B A. Pailthorpe, and L R. White. The translational and rotational drag on a cylinder moving in a membrane. J. Fluid Mech. , 110: 0 349, 1981

    work page 1981

  6. [6]

    Correlated diffusion of membrane proteins and their effect on membrane viscosity

    Naomi Oppenheimer and Haim Diamant. Correlated diffusion of membrane proteins and their effect on membrane viscosity. Biophys. J. , 96: 0 3041, 2009

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    Quantifying the diffusion of membrane proteins and peptides in black lipid membranes with 2-focus fluorescence correlation spectroscopy

    Kerstin Wei , Andreas Neef, Qui Van, Stefanie Kramer, Ingo Gregor, and J \"o rg Enderlein. Quantifying the diffusion of membrane proteins and peptides in black lipid membranes with 2-focus fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Biophysical Journal , 105 0 (2): 0 455, 2013

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Ramadurai, A

    S. Ramadurai, A. Holt, V. Krasnikov, G. Van Den Bogaart, J.A. Killian, and B. Poolman. Lateral diffusion of membrane proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. , 131: 0 12650, 2009

    work page 2009

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    Gambin, R

    Y. Gambin, R. Lopez-Esparza, M. Reffay, E. Sierecki, N. S. Gov , M.Genest, R. S. Hodes , and W. Urbach. Lateral mobility of proteins in liquid membranes revisited. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA , 103: 0 2098, 2006

    2006

  2. [10]

    Strong influence of periodic boundary conditions on lateral diffusion in lipid bilayer membranes

    Brian A Camley, Michael G Lerner, Richard W Pastor, and Frank LH Brown. Strong influence of periodic boundary conditions on lateral diffusion in lipid bilayer membranes. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 143 0 (24): 0 243113, 2015

    2015

  3. [11]

    Lipid and peptide diffusion in bilayers: The Saffman--Delbr\"uck model and periodic boundary conditions

    Richard M Venable, Helgi I Ingólfsson, Michael G Lerner, B Scott Perrin Jr, Brian A Camley, Siewert J Marrink, Frank LH Brown, and Richard W Pastor. Lipid and peptide diffusion in bilayers: The Saffman--Delbr\"uck model and periodic boundary conditions. The Journal of Physica...

    2017

  4. [12]

    Divergent diffusion coefficients in simulations of fluids and lipid membranes

    Martin V \"o gele and Gerhard Hummer. Divergent diffusion coefficients in simulations of fluids and lipid membranes. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B , 120 0 (33): 0 8722--8732, 2016

    2016

  5. [13]

    o gele, J \

    Martin V \"o gele, J \"u rgen K \"o finger, and Gerhard Hummer. Hydrodynamics of diffusion in lipid membrane simulations. Physical Review Letters , 120: 0 268104, 2018

    2018

  6. [14]

    Toward hydrodynamics with solvent free lipid models: STRD martini

    Andrew Zgorski and Edward Lyman. Toward hydrodynamics with solvent free lipid models: STRD martini. Biophysical Journal , 111 0 (12): 0 2689--2697, 2016

    2016

  7. [15]

    Levine, T.B

    Alex J. Levine, T.B. Liverpool , and F.C. MacKintosh . Mobility of extended bodies in viscous films and membranes. Phys. Rev. E , 69: 0 021503, 2004

    2004

  8. [16]

    Levine, T.B

    Alex J. Levine, T.B. Liverpool , and F.C. MacKintosh . Dynamics of rigid and flexible extended bodies in viscous films and membranes. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 93: 0 038102, 2004

    2004

  9. [17]

    Prasad, S.A

    V. Prasad, S.A. Koehler, and E.R. Weeks. Two-particle microrheology of quasi-2d viscous systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 97: 0 176001, 2006

    2006

  10. [18]

    Two-dimensional to three-dimensional transition in soap films demonstrated by microrheology

    V Prasad and Eric R Weeks. Two-dimensional to three-dimensional transition in soap films demonstrated by microrheology. Physical Review Letters , 102 0 (17): 0 178302, 2009

    2009

  11. [19]

    Brownian dynamics of elongated particles in a quasi-two-dimensional isotropic liquid

    Christoph Klopp, Ralf Stannarius, and Alexey Eremin. Brownian dynamics of elongated particles in a quasi-two-dimensional isotropic liquid. Physical Review Fluids , 2 0 (12): 0 124202, 2017

    2017

  12. [20]

    Crossover between 2d and 3d fluid dynamics in the diffusion of islands in ultrathin freely suspended smectic films

    Zoom Hoang Nguyen, Markus Atkinson, Cheol Soo Park, Joseph Maclennan, Matthew Glaser, and Noel Clark. Crossover between 2d and 3d fluid dynamics in the diffusion of islands in ultrathin freely suspended smectic films. Physical Review Letters , 105 0 (26): 0 268304, 2010

    2010

  13. [21]

    Interfacial hydrodynamic drag on nanowires embedded in thin oil films and protein layers

    Myung Han Lee, Clayton P Lapointe, Daniel H Reich, Kathleen J Stebe, and Robert L Leheny. Interfacial hydrodynamic drag on nanowires embedded in thin oil films and protein layers. Langmuir , 25 0 (14): 0 7976--7982, 2009

    2009

  14. [22]

    Cicuta, Sarah L

    P. Cicuta, Sarah L. Keller, and Sarah L. Veatch. Diffusion of liquid domains in lipid bilayer membranes. J. Phys. Chem. B , 111: 0 3328, 2007

    2007

  15. [23]

    Two-point microrheology of phase-separated domains in lipid bilayers

    Tristan T Hormel, Matthew A Reyer, and Raghuveer Parthasarathy. Two-point microrheology of phase-separated domains in lipid bilayers. Biophysical Journal , 109 0 (4): 0 732--736, 2015

    2015

  16. [24]

    Diffusion of complex objects embedded in free and supported lipid bilayer membranes: role of shape anisotropy and leaflet structure

    Brian A Camley and Frank LH Brown. Diffusion of complex objects embedded in free and supported lipid bilayer membranes: role of shape anisotropy and leaflet structure. Soft Matter , 9 0 (19): 0 4767, 2013

    2013

  17. [25]

    Calculating hydrodynamic interactions for membrane-embedded objects

    Ehsan Noruzifar, Brian A Camley, and Frank LH Brown. Calculating hydrodynamic interactions for membrane-embedded objects. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 141 0 (12): 0 124711, 2014

    2014

  18. [26]

    Henle and A.J

    M.L. Henle and A.J. Levine. Effective viscosity of a dilute suspension of membrane-bound inclusions. Physics of Fluids , 21: 0 033106, 2009

    2009

  19. [27]

    Lubensky and R E

    D K. Lubensky and R E. Goldstein. Hydrodynamics of monolayer domains at the air-water interface. Phys. Fluids , 8: 0 843, 1996

    1996

  20. [28]

    Levine and F.C

    Alex J. Levine and F.C. MacKintosh . Dynamics of viscoelastic membranes. Phys. Rev. E , 66: 0 061606, 2002

    2002

  21. [29]

    The method of regularized Stokeslets in three dimensions: Analysis, validation, and application to helical swimming

    Ricardo Cortez, Lisa Fauci, and Alexei Medovikov. The method of regularized Stokeslets in three dimensions: Analysis, validation, and application to helical swimming. Phys. Fluids , 17: 0 031504, 2005

    2005

  22. [30]

    The Method of Regularized Stokeslets

    Ricardo Cortez. The Method of Regularized Stokeslets . SIAM J. Sci. Comput. , 23: 0 1204, 2001

    2001

  23. [31]

    Frictional coefficients of multisubunit structures

    V Bloomfield, WO Dalton, and KE Van Holde. Frictional coefficients of multisubunit structures. I. Theory . Biopolymers: Original Research on Biomolecules , 5 0 (2): 0 135--148, 1967

    1967

  24. [32]

    Improved calculation of rotational diffusion and intrinsic viscosity of bead models for macromolecules and nanoparticles

    J Garc \' a de la Torre, G del Rio Echenique, and A Ortega. Improved calculation of rotational diffusion and intrinsic viscosity of bead models for macromolecules and nanoparticles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B , 111 0 (5): 0 955--961, 2007

    2007

  25. [33]

    Calculation of hydrodynamic properties of globular proteins from their atomic-level structure

    Jos \'e Garc \' a de la Torre, Mar \' a L Huertas, and Beatriz Carrasco. Calculation of hydrodynamic properties of globular proteins from their atomic-level structure. Biophysical Journal , 78 0 (2): 0 719--730, 2000

    2000

  26. [34]

    Hydrodynamic interactions in freely suspended liquid crystal films

    Tatiana Kuriabova, Thomas R Powers, Zhiyuan Qi, Aaron Goldfain, Cheol Soo Park, Matthew A Glaser, Joseph E Maclennan, and Noel A Clark. Hydrodynamic interactions in freely suspended liquid crystal films. Physical Review E , 94 0 (5): 0 052701, 2016

    2016

  27. [35]

    Mutual diffusion of inclusions in freely suspended smectic liquid crystal films

    Zhiyuan Qi, Zoom Hoang Nguyen, Cheol Soo Park, Matthew A Glaser, Joseph E Maclennan, Noel A Clark, Tatiana Kuriabova, and Thomas R Powers. Mutual diffusion of inclusions in freely suspended smectic liquid crystal films. Physical Review Letters , 113 0 (12): 0 128304, 2014

    2014

  28. [36]

    Sangtae Kim and Seppo J. Karrila. Microhydrodynamics: Principles and Selected Applications . Dover Publications, 2005

    2005

  29. [37]

    Fluctuating hydrodynamics of multicomponent membranes with embedded proteins

    Brian A Camley and Frank LH Brown. Fluctuating hydrodynamics of multicomponent membranes with embedded proteins. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 141 0 (7): 0 075103, 2014

    2014

  30. [38]

    The drag on needles moving in a Langmuir monolayer

    T.M Fischer. The drag on needles moving in a Langmuir monolayer. J. Fluid Mech. , 498: 0 123, 2004

    2004

  31. [39]

    Camley, C

    B A. Camley, C. Esposito, T. Baumgart, and F L H. Brown. Lipid bilayer domain fluctuations as a probe of membrane viscosity. Biophys. J. , 99: 0 L44, 2010

    2010

  32. [40]

    Translational and rotational diffusion of micrometer-sized solid domains in lipid membranes

    Eugene P Petrov, Rafayel Petrosyan, and Petra Schwille. Translational and rotational diffusion of micrometer-sized solid domains in lipid membranes. Soft Matter , 8 0 (29): 0 7552, 2012

    2012

  33. [41]

    Petrov and Petra Schwille

    Eugene P. Petrov and Petra Schwille. Translational diffusion in lipid membranes beyond the Saffmann-Delbr\"uck approximation. Biophys. J. , 94: 0 L41, 2008

    2008

  34. [42]

    Membrane viscosity determined from shear-driven flow in giant vesicles

    Aurelia R Honerkamp-Smith, Francis G Woodhouse, Vasily Kantsler, and Raymond E Goldstein. Membrane viscosity determined from shear-driven flow in giant vesicles. Physical Review Letters , 111 0 (3): 0 038103, 2013

    2013

  35. [43]

    Reich, Kathleen J

    Myung Han Lee, Daniel H. Reich, Kathleen J. Stebe, and Robert L. Leheny. Combined passive and active microrheology study of protein-layer formation at an air-water interface. Langmuir , 26: 0 2650, 2010

    2010

  36. [44]

    Kim, S.Q

    K.H. Kim, S.Q. Choi, J.A. Zasadzinski, and T.M. Squires. Interfacial microrheology of DPPC monolayers at the air--water interface. Soft Matter , 7 0 (17): 0 7782--7789, 2011

    2011

  37. [45]

    Finite-size corrected rotational diffusion coefficients of membrane proteins and carbon nanotubes from molecular dynamics simulations

    Martin V \"o gele, Juergen Koefinger, and Gerhard Hummer. Finite-size corrected rotational diffusion coefficients of membrane proteins and carbon nanotubes from molecular dynamics simulations. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B , 2019

    2019

  38. [46]

    Domanski, S

    J. Domanski, S. J. Marrink, and L. V. Schafer. Transmembrane helices can induce domain formation in crowded model membranes. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes , 1818: 0 984--994, 2012

    2012

  39. [47]

    Javanainen, H

    M. Javanainen, H. Hammaren, L. Monticelli, J. H. Jeon, M. S. Miettinen, H. Martinez-Seara, R. Metzler, and L. Vattulainen. Anomalous and normal diffusion of proteins and lipids in crowded lipid membranes. Faraday Discuss. , 161: 0 397--417, 2013

    2013

  40. [48]

    J. E. Goose and M. S. P. Sansom. Reduced lateral mobility of lipids and proteins in crowded membranes. PLoS Comput. Biol. , 161: 0 e1003033, 2013

    2013

  41. [49]

    J. H. Jeon, M. Javanainen, H. Martinez-Sera, R. Metzler, and I. Vattulainen. Protein crowding in lipid bilayers gives rise to non- Gaussian anomalous lateral diffusion of phospholipids and proteins. Phys. Rev. X , 6: 0 021006, 2016

    2016

  42. [50]

    Diffusion of integral membrane proteins in protein-rich membranes

    Matti Javanainen, Hector Martinez-Seara, Ralf Metzler, and Ilpo Vattulainen. Diffusion of integral membrane proteins in protein-rich membranes. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters , 8 0 (17): 0 4308--4313, 2017

    2017

  43. [51]

    Long-time self-diffusion coefficient and zero-frequency viscosity of dilute suspensions of spherical brownian particles

    B Cichocki and BU Felderhof. Long-time self-diffusion coefficient and zero-frequency viscosity of dilute suspensions of spherical brownian particles. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 89 0 (6): 0 3705--3709, 1988

    1988

  44. [52]

    The Huggins coefficient for the square-well colloidal fluid

    Johan Bergenholtz and Norman J Wagner. The Huggins coefficient for the square-well colloidal fluid. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research , 33 0 (10): 0 2391--2397, 1994

    1994

  45. [53]

    The rheology of Brownian suspensions

    Georges Bossis and John F Brady. The rheology of Brownian suspensions. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 91 0 (3): 0 1866--1874, 1989

    1989

  46. [54]

    Ronald G. Larson. The Structure and Rheology of Complex Fluids . Oxford University Press, 1999

    1999

  47. [55]

    On three-dimensional rotational averages

    DL Andrews and T Thirunamachandran. On three-dimensional rotational averages. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 67 0 (11): 0 5026--5033, 1977

    1977

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.