Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 11 references

On a joint quantized and mechanical description for the Chernov-L\"uders macroband of localized deformation

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that plastic flow in polycrystalline metals can be described by a two-level quantum system of dislocons, yielding closed-form dislocation density and flow stress over all grain sizes and a strength maximum at tens of…

desk verdict The central grain-size dependence comes from an un-derived 1/N in the Boltzmann factor, so the Hall-Petch-like maximum is not a prediction; the three-level dislocon story for Chernov-Lüders bands is new but qualitative. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.02754 v1 pith:HKHSYXAQ submitted 2019-09-06 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.soft

Alexander A. Reshetnyak , Eugeniy V. Shilko , Yurii P. Sharkeev This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.soft
keywords disloconChernov–LüdersmacrobandscalardislocationdensityHall–Petchlawtwo-levelsystemflowstresspolycrystallinemetalsacousticemission
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that plastic flow in polycrystalline metals can be described quantitatively by treating the smallest unit of dislocation energy as a quasiparticle, a 'dislocon,' pictured as a short-lived bundle of acoustic phonons, which grains absorb to create defects and emit when the lattice locally heals. On a two-level, equally spaced energy spectrum per crystallite, the balance of spontaneous emission, stimulated emission, and stimulated absorption of dislocons yields closed-form expressions for the scalar dislocation density and, through the Taylor strain-hardening law, the flow stress, valid across the whole grain-size range from coarse to nanocrystalline. If correct, the theory reproduces the familiar Hall–Petch rise in strength with decreasing grain size, predicts a strength maximum at a grain size of roughly tens of nanometres, and produces the stress–strain curve from a small set of material constants. The same machinery, extended to a third energy level, is proposed as the mechanism behind the Chernov–Lüders shear macroband and the acoustic-emission burst that accompanies it.

What carries the argument

The central object is the dislocon, a composite quasiparticle interpreted as bound acoustic phonons, carrying the unit dislocation energy $\hbar\omega_\varepsilon = \tfrac12 G b_\varepsilon^3$. The argument is carried by a two-level rate-equation balance in every grain, spontaneous emission of dislocons, stimulated emission, and stimulated absorption, combined with a Boltzmann occupation law $W_i = C\exp[-E_i/(NkT)]$ in which $N = d/b_\varepsilon$ is the number of Burgers-vector steps across the grain. All grain-size dependence enters through that exponent; the resulting dislocation density is then converted into stress by the Taylor strain-hardening law, and a third energy level is added to model inversion and coherent emission in Chernov–Lüders bands.

What would settle it

Measure the scalar dislocation density and yield stress of a single-phase polycrystalline metal, e.g. $\alpha$-Fe or Cu, at fixed temperature and strain over grain sizes from about 10 nm to 100 μm; if the density does not follow Equation (8) with its maximum near $d_\rho \approx 20$–$30$ nm, or if the maximum does not move as $1/T$ when temperature is varied, the central claim is wrong. A separate check: derive $\exp[-E/(NkT)]$ from a defined microstate count, since without such a derivation the size dependence is unsupported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that each crystallite acts as a small quantum system with equidistant levels, and that the minimal mechanical-energy quantum, the dislocon, $\hbar\omega_\varepsilon = \tfrac12 G b_\varepsilon^3$ with $b_\varepsilon = b(1+\varepsilon)$, is the currency of defect creation and lattice restoration. At fixed strain $\varepsilon$, detailed balance between spontaneous emission, induced emission, and induced absorption gives the occupation ratio of the two levels; with Boltzmann occupations $W_i = C\exp[-E_i/(NkT)]$ and $N = d/b_\varepsilon$, this leads to the scalar dislocation density $\bar\rho(b_\varepsilon,d,T,\varepsilon) = M(0)\tfrac{6\sqrt2}{\pi}\tfrac{m_0}{d^2}\,\varepsilon\,(e^{M(\varepsilon)b/d}-1)^{-1}$ with $M(\varepsilon) = Gb_\varepsilon^3/(2kT)$, and hence, via $\sigma = \sigma_0 + \alpha m G b \sqrt{\bar\rho}$, to the flow stress. In the coarse-grain limit the flow stress reduces to a generalized Hall–Petch law; it reaches a maximum at $d_\rho = b\,G b^3(1+\varepsilon)^3/(2\cdot1.59363\,kT)$, i.e. tens of nanometres at room temperature for common metals. The paper further claims that adding an intermediate third level, with inverted population in local plasticity zones, provides a step-by-step mechanism for Chernov–Lüders band nucleation and propagation, with the observed acoustic-emission amplification attributed to quasi-coherent dislocon, i.e. phonon, emission.

Load-bearing premise

Everything about how strength depends on grain size comes from writing the probability that a grain occupies a given energy level as $C\exp[-E/(NkT)]$ with $N = d/b_\varepsilon$; this division by the number of Burgers-vector steps is assumed, not derived, and if it is wrong the predicted Hall–Petch-like rise and the strength maximum at $d_\rho$ are artifacts rather than physical predictions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The same two-level balance gives the scalar dislocation density for any grain size, temperature, and strain from shear modulus, Burgers vector, and a texture factor.
  • It produces an analytic flow-stress curve, including yield strength, with a generalized Hall–Petch behavior in the coarse-grain limit.
  • It predicts a maximum in dislocation density and strength at a critical grain size $d_\rho$ of tens of nanometres, with the peak position shifting as $1/T$.
  • It gives a physical origin for the Chernov–Lüders macroband: inverted level populations in local plasticity zones trigger quasi-coherent dislocon emission and an autowave propagation front.
  • The same three-level description can be carried over to the Portevin–Le Chatelier effect.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: because $d_\rho \propto 1/T$, measuring the strength maximum across a temperature series would directly isolate the Boltzmann-normalization mechanism from other size-effect causes.
  • Beyond the paper: the two-level model's lasing analogy implies that the acoustic-emission burst should be quasi-coherent and narrowband, so time-resolved acoustic spectra during band propagation could test that prediction.
  • Beyond the paper: the $1/N$ in the Boltzmann factor is not derived from a Hamiltonian, so re-deriving it from a microstate count along a dislocation line would either justify the entire size dependence or reveal that the predicted peak is an artifact.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a quantum-statistical description of plastic deformation in polycrystals. Each crystallite is assigned an equidistant defect energy spectrum with spacing G b_epsilon^3/2, and transitions between levels are interpreted as absorption/emission of 'dislocons'. From a detailed-balance condition with a Boltzmann population factor W_i = C exp(-E_i/(N kT)) and N = d/b_epsilon, the authors derive analytic expressions for the scalar dislocation density rho(d,T,epsilon), Eq. (8), and the flow stress sigma(epsilon), Eq. (9), across the entire grain-size range. A three-level extension is then described verbally to account for Chernov-Lueders macroband propagation. The paper claims analytic predictions of Hall-Petch behavior, a strength maximum at a grain size d_rho of tens of nanometers, and full stress-strain curves from a small set of material parameters.

Significance. If the central derivation were sound, the paper would provide a rare fully analytic, grain-size-dependent flow-stress formula with specific falsifiable predictions, including a predicted maximum at a calculable grain size. The manuscript also has the merit of being explicit about its assumptions and of connecting the formalism to a concrete experimental phenomenon (Chernov-Lueders bands and acoustic emission). However, the load-bearing statistical input, the N-dependent Boltzmann factor, is introduced without derivation, and the resulting d-dependence is exactly what generates the Hall-Petch-like behavior and the maximum. As the manuscript stands, the central claim is therefore not established; the quantitative results are an artifact of an unverified normalization.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2, after Eq. (5)] The population factors are written as W_i = C exp(-E_i(epsilon)/(N kT)) with N = d/b_epsilon, but no derivation or justification for this nonstandard Boltzmann form is given. In standard statistical mechanics W_i = C exp(-E_i/(kT)), so the exponent would be independent of d. Since this is the only place where the grain size d enters the detailed-balance equation (5), all d-dependence in Eq. (8) and the maximum at d_rho are consequences of this un-derived normalization rather than of the physics of the two-level system. The authors should either derive this N-factor from a Hamiltonian or coarse-graining argument, or clearly state it as a separate postulate and test its plausibility.
  2. [Equations (6) and (8)] There is an internal algebraic inconsistency between Eq. (6) and Eq. (8). With N = d/b_epsilon and E_n - E_m = (n-m)G b_epsilon^3/2, the exponent in Eq. (6) should be (n-m)G b_epsilon^4/(2 kT d) = (n-m)G b^4(1+epsilon)^4/(2 kT d). Equation (8), however, uses the exponent M(epsilon) b/d with M(epsilon) = G b_epsilon^3/(2kT), which equals G b^4(1+epsilon)^3/(2 kT d). The two expressions differ by a factor (1+epsilon), and the factor (n-m) also disappears. Thus Eq. (8) does not follow algebraically from Eq. (6), and the reader cannot reproduce the central result.
  3. [Equations (7) and (8)] The derivation is circular with respect to the coarse-grain limit. The transition-probability ratio P_nm^epsilon / P_nm^epsilon|ind is fixed by importing the coarse-grain formula rho proportional to 1/d from the authors' earlier work [3,4] via Eq. (7). The paper then uses this ratio in Eq. (8). Consequently, the new formula for rho is an interpolation that is forced to match the previous rho ~ 1/d result; the claimed prediction of a maximum at d_rho is not an independent consequence of the two-level system but of the inserted N = d/b_epsilon normalization designed to reproduce the imported result.
  4. [Section 'Two- and three-level system quantized approach'] The Chernov-Lueders macroband mechanism is presented purely verbally. The five-step description of inverse population, spontaneous and induced emission, and propagation contains no equations, no transition rates, no condition for population inversion, and no testable prediction for band velocity, band width, or acoustic emission intensity. As written, this section offers a qualitative analogy rather than a derivation, yet the abstract and summary present it as a substantive result of the quantized approach.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2, Eq. (2)-(4)] The symbol N_n^epsilon is called 'the number of grain atoms (defects)' but it is used in equations that are said to give rates per unit volume; the text should clarify whether N_n^epsilon is a number, a density, or a population fraction.
  2. [Eq. (6)] The notation 'lim_{N= d/b_epsilon >> b}' is malformed: it should specify a limiting variable, presumably d/b_epsilon -> infinity, and the condition '>> b' is dimensionally inconsistent (d/b_epsilon is dimensionless, while b is a length).
  3. [Section on three-level systems] The text states 'Еn(ε), Еn(ε)' where the intended levels are clearly Еm(ε) and Еn(ε); this typo should be corrected.
  4. [Table 1] Table 1 is difficult to read because of garbled units (e.g., the entries for k(0.002) and the 'frames' mentioned in the text) and missing explanatory captions; some values appear to be OCR artifacts.
  5. [References] The paper relies heavily on references [3,4,5,6], several of which are described as 'submitted' or as e-prints. The authors should indicate which results are already published and which are only in preprint form, and should make the present paper more self-contained by restating the essential imported formulas.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 8.0 of 10

The central grain-size dependence and d_rho maximum of Eq. (8) are introduced by the un-derived N=d/b_epsilon in the Boltzmann weight, while m0 is fitted from the empirical Hall-Petch coefficient, so the predictions reduce to their inputs by construction.

  1. self definitional [Section 2, after Eq. (5), through Eqs. (6) and (8)]
    "At thermodynamic equilibrium ... crystallites occupy the energy levels Е𝑖(ε), 𝑖 = 𝑛, 𝑚, according to the Boltzmann distribution ... 𝑊𝑖 = 𝐶 exp(−Е𝑖(ε)/𝑁𝑘𝑇). ... 𝑑𝜌(ε,𝑇) = b 𝐺𝑏3(1+𝜀)3/(2∙1,59363 ∙𝑘𝑇)."

    The level spacing E_n−E_m=(n−m)G b_ε^3/2 is independent of the grain size d, so a normal Boltzmann factor would put no d into the exponent. The paper introduces N=d/b_ε into W_i=C exp(−E_i/(NkT)) without derivation from a Hamiltonian or a coarse-graining argument. This inserted N is the only source of the d-dependent exponent exp((n−m)G b_ε^3/(2NkT)) in Eq. (6) and hence of the e^{M(ε)b/d} factor and the maximum d_ρ in Eq. (8). The central Hall–Petch-like branch and the strength maximum are therefore built into the assumed form of W_i by definition, not derived from the two-level dynamics.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section 2, Eqs. (6)–(8), matching to the coarse-grain limit after Eq. (7)]
    "Using the explicit form of ρ(bε,d,T,ε) in the CG limit [3,4], ρ(bε,d,T,ε)|_{d/b≫b}=12/π εm0/(bεd(1+ε)), with allowance for a specific distribution of crystallites ... we have ρ̅(bε,d,T,ε)|_{d/b≫b}=ρ(bε,d,T,ε)K̅=K̅ 12/π εm0/(bεd(1+ε)) for 0<K̅≤1."

    The only free kinetic coefficients in the detailed-balance solution, P_nm^ε/P_nm^{ε|ind}, are fixed by equating the large-N limit of Eq. (6) to the coarse-grain SDD taken from the authors' own earlier works [3,4]. Thus Eq. (8) is calibrated to that prior CG expression: in the CG limit it reproduces the imported formula by construction, and the newly claimed fine-grain regime is controlled entirely by the inserted 1/N of the previous step. This is a fitted input presented as a derivation, with the load-bearing calibration coming from same-author prior results.

1 more flagged steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 2, after Eq. (9), before Table 1]
    "The values of m0 are determined in the CG limit of the HP law: σ(ε)|_{d≫b}=σ0(ε)+k(ε)d^{-1/2} ⇒ k(ε)√(1+ε)^3/ε = αmG√(6√2/π) m0b, where m0=m0(k^2(ε))."

    The stress formula (9) in the coarse-grain limit is σ≈σ0+αmGb√ρ with ρ∝m0/d, so the predicted Hall–Petch branch is controlled by m0. The paper explicitly determines m0 from the empirical Hall–Petch coefficient k(ε) taken from experimental data. The predicted d^{-1/2} hardening is therefore equivalent by construction to the same empirical HP law used to set m0; it is calibration, not an independent prediction.

full rationale

The paper's generic detailed-balance formalism (Eqs. (1)–(5)) is not circular by itself. The circularity enters at three load-bearing points. First, the grain-size dependence and the d_ρ maximum are inserted rather than derived: the Boltzmann weight is declared to be W_i=C exp(−E_i/(NkT)) with N=d/b_ε, even though the level spacing (1) is d-independent; this N is the sole source of the d-dependent exponent in Eqs. (6) and (8). Second, the transition-probability ratio is fixed by matching to the coarse-grain SDD expression imported from the authors' earlier papers [3,4], so Eq. (8) reduces to that self-cited input by construction. Third, the parameter m0 entering the stress curve is fitted to the experimental Hall–Petch coefficient k(ε), making the predicted HP branch a restatement of the empirical law used as input. There is no machine-checked or externally independent derivation of these inputs. The remaining qualitative discussion of the Chernov–Lüders macroband is not quantitatively load-bearing for Eqs. (8)–(9), but the central quantitative claims reduce to the inserted normalization and to prior/experimental calibrations, so a high circularity score is warranted.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on several postulates imported from the authors' prior work: the equidistant defect spectrum, the nonstandard Boltzmann normalization with N = d/b_epsilon, the coarse-grain formula for rho, and the Taylor hardening relation. The free parameters m0, alpha, and sigma0 are calibrated from Hall-Petch data or literature. The invented dislocon entity is conceptually suggestive but has no independent falsifiable evidence beyond general acoustic emission.

free parameters (3)
  • m0 (polyhedral parameter) = Material-dependent, e.g., 40.7 to 56.8 for alpha-Fe, 17.8 for Cu (Table 1)
    Determined from the experimental Hall-Petch coefficient k(epsilon) via k(epsilon) sqrt((1+epsilon)^3/epsilon) = alpha m G sqrt(6 sqrt(2)/pi m0 b), so the final sigma(epsilon) reproduces the Hall-Petch slope by construction.
  • dislocation interaction constant alpha = 0.27 to 0.97 from Table 1, with the text noting about 0.5 for Zr
    Taken from literature or estimates and appears in Eq. (9) as a multiplier of the hardening term. It is not derived within the paper.
  • friction stress sigma0(epsilon) = Not tabulated; material input
    Appears as an additive term in Eq. (9) from the Taylor relation. The paper provides no microscopic prediction for this quantity.
assumptions (6)
  • ad hoc to paper Each crystallite has an equidistant defect energy spectrum with level spacing E_d^Le = G b_epsilon^3 / 2 and N = [d/b] levels.
    Invoked in Section 2 before Eq. (1) and used throughout. This spectrum is postulated rather than derived from a Hamiltonian or defect model.
  • ad hoc to paper Crystallite level populations follow the Boltzmann distribution W_i = C exp(-E_i/(N kT)) with N = d/b_epsilon.
    Stated after Eq. (5). The division by N is nonstandard and is the main source of the grain-size dependence in the final formula.
  • standard math Einstein rate equations and detailed balance with symmetric induced probabilities apply to defect creation and annihilation transitions.
    Eqs. (2) to (5). The rate-equation formalism is standard, although applying it to dislocation density is a modeling assumption.
  • domain assumption The coarse-grain limit of the scalar dislocation density is rho = (12/pi) epsilon m0 / (b_epsilon d (1+epsilon)), from prior works [3,4].
    Used after Eq. (6) to fix the ratio P_nm/P_ind. This imports the asymptotic form of the quantity being derived into the derivation.
  • domain assumption Taylor strain-hardening relation tau = tau_f + alpha G b sqrt(rho) with Taylor factor m = 3.05 holds.
    Used in Eq. (9) to convert dislocation density into flow stress. This is a standard empirical relation, not a derivation.
  • ad hoc to paper Inverted population of defect levels in zones of localized plasticity drives Chernov-Lüders band propagation via coherent dislocon emission.
    Section 3 asserts this mechanism qualitatively with no equations, quantitative predictions, or independent evidence.
invented entities (2)
  • Dislocon
    purpose: Quasi-particle quantum of dislocation energy, hbar omega_epsilon = (1/2) G b_epsilon^3, composed of acoustic phonons, mediating energy absorption and emission by crystal grains and macroband propagation.
    Acoustic emission enhancement in Lüders bands [10,11] supports phonon activity but does not single out this quantized particle. The energy scale is just the elastic energy of a unit dislocation segment, so the entity is an interpretation rather than an independently confirmed object.
  • Three-level crystallite energy system with intermediate level E_k
    purpose: Provides a laser-like inverted-population mechanism for Chernov-Lüders band emergence and propagation.
    Proposed as a narrative model in Section 3. No independent measurements of the intermediate level or of population inversions are provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On a joint quantized and mechanical description for the Chernov-L\"uders macroband of localized deformation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HKHSYXAQ

@misc{pith2026190902754,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On a joint quantized and mechanical description for the Chernov-L\"uders macroband of localized deformation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HKHSYXAQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.02754}
}
read the original abstract

We suggest a quantum procedure, based on our recent statistical theory of flow stress in polycrystalline materials under quasi-static plastic deformations, with the intention to approach a theoretical description of the Chernov-L\"uders shear macroband of localized deformation, exhibited by some Fe-containing materials with a second phase beyond the yield-strength point on the stress-strain curve {\sigma}={\sigma}({\epsilon}). The procedure makes substantial use of a quasi-particle interpretation for the minimal portion of mechanical energy in a given single-mode polycrystalline aggregate that is necessary for the thermal-fluctuation mechanism to create a 0D-defect nanopore as the initial zone of a localized deformation under external loading. Using a quasi-particle description, we obtain analytic expressions both for the scalar density of dislocations, given the size of grains, the temperature, the most probable sliding system, and for the dependence {\sigma} ={\sigma}({\epsilon}) itself. A two-level system, which characterizes the mechanism of absorption and emission of such quasi-particles (dislocons) by the crystal lattice of any grain under quasi-static loading provides an effective physical description for the emergence and propagation of the Chernov-L\"uders shear macroband. An enhancement of acoustic emission observed in experiments and accompanied by the macroband phenomenon justifies the interpretation of a dislocon as a composite short-lived particle consisting of acoustic phonons. A more realistic three-level system within a two-phase model with third (with dispersion particles) phase presence for actual polycrystalline samples is also produced.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

11 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Langdon, Bulk Nanostructured Materials: Fundamentals and Applications, Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, 2014

    R.Z,Valiev A.P.Zhilyaev T.G. Langdon, Bulk Nanostructured Materials: Fundamentals and Applications, Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, 2014

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    E.O. Hall. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 64, 474 (1951); N.J. Petch. J. Iron Steel Inst. 174, 25 (1953)

    work page 1951

  3. [3]

    А.Reshetnyak, Statistical approach to flow stress and generalized Hall-Petch law for polycrystalline materials under plastic deformations, submitted in Russ. Phys. Journal (2018), Arxiv:1803.08247[cond-mat.mtr-sci]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  4. [4]

    А.А.Reshetnyak, Peculiriaties of temperature dependence for generalized Hall-Petch Law and two-phase model for de- formable polycrystalline materials, submitted to Russ. Phys. Journal (2018). Arxiv:1805.08623[cond-mat.mtr-sci]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  5. [5]

    Reshetnyak, On statistical quantized approach to flow stress and generalized Hall -Petch law for deformable polycrystalline materials

    A.A. Reshetnyak, On statistical quantized approach to flow stress and generalized Hall -Petch law for deformable polycrystalline materials. Temperature-dimensional effect. (submitted to Phys.Rev.B)

    work page

  6. [6]

    Two-phase model of the polycrystalline aggregate with account for grain-boundary states under quasi-static deformation

    A.A. Reshetnyak, Sharkeev Yu.P., Two -phase model of the polycrystalline aggregate with account for grain-boundary states under quasi -static deformation // AIP Conference Proceedings. – 2018. V.2051- p.020251 – e-print - arXiv:1809.03628[cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  7. [7]

    Glezer, E.V

    A.M. Glezer, E.V. Kozlov, N.A. Koneva et al. Plastic Deformation of Nanostructured Materials – CRC Press, 2017, 334p

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Firstov, Yu.F

    S.A. Firstov, Yu.F. Lugovskoi and B.A. Movchan, Structure, strength and fatigue resistance of micro - crystalline and micro-layer materials. – Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 2016, 171p. (in Russian)

    work page 2016

Show all 11 references
  1. [9]

    Physical Quantities. Guide. Edited I.S. Grigoriev, I..Z Meilihov. Moscow:Energoatomizdat–1991.–1232p [in Russian]

    1991

  2. [10]

    Muraviev, L.B

    T.V. Muraviev, L.B. Zuev, Technical Physics. 53, 1094, (2008)

    2008

  3. [11]

    Gorbatenko, V.I

    V.V. Gorbatenko, V.I. Danilov, L.B. Zuev , Plastic flow instability: Chernov–Lüders bands and the Portevin—Le Chatelier effect, Technical Physics. 62, 395, (2017)

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.