REVIEW 2 cited by
FAT Forensics: A Python Toolbox for Algorithmic Fairness, Accountability and Transparency
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Today, artificial intelligence systems driven by machine learning algorithms can be in a position to take important, and sometimes legally binding, decisions about our everyday lives. In many cases, however, these systems and their actions are neither regulated nor certified. To help counter the potential harm that such algorithms can cause we developed an open source toolbox that can analyse selected fairness, accountability and transparency aspects of the machine learning process: data (and their features), models and predictions, allowing to automatically and objectively report them to relevant stakeholders. In this paper we describe the design, scope, usage and impact of this Python package, which is published under the 3-Clause BSD open source licence.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
What Makes a Fairness Tool Project Sustainable in Open Source?
A GitHub mining study of 61 fairness tools finds that only about a third are actively maintained and industry-backed projects are the most stable.
-
Exploring the Landscape of Fairness Interventions in Software Engineering
A survey of fairness interventions in software engineering that organizes prior work into a taxonomy and adds a small empirical analysis of open-source fairness repository maintenance.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.