Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Say What I Want: Towards the Dark Side of Neural Dialogue Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1909.06044 v3 pith:RID3GGLW submitted 2019-09-13 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords dialogueneuralmodelmodelsinputschatbotdarkoutputs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Neural dialogue models have been widely adopted in various chatbot applications because of their good performance in simulating and generalizing human conversations. However, there exists a dark side of these models -- due to the vulnerability of neural networks, a neural dialogue model can be manipulated by users to say what they want, which brings in concerns about the security of practical chatbot services. In this work, we investigate whether we can craft inputs that lead a well-trained black-box neural dialogue model to generate targeted outputs. We formulate this as a reinforcement learning (RL) problem and train a Reverse Dialogue Generator which efficiently finds such inputs for targeted outputs. Experiments conducted on a representative neural dialogue model show that our proposed model is able to discover such desired inputs in a considerable portion of cases. Overall, our work reveals this weakness of neural dialogue models and may prompt further researches of developing corresponding solutions to avoid it.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Harnessing RLHF for Robust Unanswerability Recognition and Trustworthy Response Generation in LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    SALU, a multi-task fine-tuning and confidence-guided RLHF method, reduces hallucinated answers on unanswerable Chinese CIR questions to 1.3 percent on the authors' private dataset.

Pith tools