Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Multi-task Batch Reinforcement Learning with Metric Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1909.11373 v6 pith:ZZHLYY3X submitted 2019-09-25 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML

Multi-task Batch Reinforcement Learning with Metric Learning

classification cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML
keywords tasktaskstextbftextdifferentlearningmulti-taskpolicy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

We tackle the Multi-task Batch Reinforcement Learning problem. Given multiple datasets collected from different tasks, we train a multi-task policy to perform well in unseen tasks sampled from the same distribution. The task identities of the unseen tasks are not provided. To perform well, the policy must infer the task identity from collected transitions by modelling its dependency on states, actions and rewards. Because the different datasets may have state-action distributions with large divergence, the task inference module can learn to ignore the rewards and spuriously correlate $\textit{only}$ state-action pairs to the task identity, leading to poor test time performance. To robustify task inference, we propose a novel application of the triplet loss. To mine hard negative examples, we relabel the transitions from the training tasks by approximating their reward functions. When we allow further training on the unseen tasks, using the trained policy as an initialization leads to significantly faster convergence compared to randomly initialized policies (up to $80\%$ improvement and across 5 different Mujoco task distributions). We name our method $\textbf{MBML}$ ($\textbf{M}\text{ulti-task}$ $\textbf{B}\text{atch}$ RL with $\textbf{M}\text{etric}$ $\textbf{L}\text{earning}$).

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.