REVIEW 2 cited by
MLPerf Training Benchmark
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Machine learning (ML) needs industry-standard performance benchmarks to support design and competitive evaluation of the many emerging software and hardware solutions for ML. But ML training presents three unique benchmarking challenges absent from other domains: optimizations that improve training throughput can increase the time to solution, training is stochastic and time to solution exhibits high variance, and software and hardware systems are so diverse that fair benchmarking with the same binary, code, and even hyperparameters is difficult. We therefore present MLPerf, an ML benchmark that overcomes these challenges. Our analysis quantitatively evaluates MLPerf's efficacy at driving performance and scalability improvements across two rounds of results from multiple vendors.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
CarbonSet: A Dataset to Analyze Trends and Benchmark the Sustainability of CPUs and GPUs
CarbonSet provides lifecycle carbon footprint estimates for over 1,000 CPUs and GPUs and finds that datacenter GPU total CFP grew more than 50x from 2016 to 2023, driven by shipment growth.
-
Quantum Compiler Design for Qubit Mapping and Routing: A Cross-Architectural Survey of Superconducting, Trapped-Ion, and Neutral Atom Systems
A cross-architectural survey that categorizes qubit mapping and routing compilers for superconducting, trapped-ion, and neutral atom quantum hardware.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.