Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Auditing and Achieving Intersectional Fairness in Classification Problems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1911.01468 v2 pith:4NYQUDTV submitted 2019-11-04 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CYstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CYstat.ML
keywords fairnessintersectionalachievingclassificationmodelsensitiveattributeauditing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine learning algorithms are extensively used to make increasingly more consequential decisions about people, so achieving optimal predictive performance can no longer be the only focus. A particularly important consideration is fairness with respect to race, gender, or any other sensitive attribute. This paper studies intersectional fairness, where intersections of multiple sensitive attributes are considered. Prior research has mainly focused on fairness with respect to a single sensitive attribute, with intersectional fairness being comparatively less studied despite its critical importance for the safety of modern machine learning systems. We present a comprehensive framework for auditing and achieving intersectional fairness in classification problems: we define a suite of metrics to assess intersectional fairness in the data or model outputs by extending known single-attribute fairness metrics, and propose methods for robustly estimating them even when some intersectional subgroups are underrepresented. Furthermore, we develop post-processing techniques to mitigate any detected intersectional bias in a classification model. Our techniques do not rely on any assumptions regarding the underlying model and preserve predictive performance at a guaranteed level of fairness. Finally, we give guidance on a practical implementation, showing how the proposed methods perform on a real-world dataset.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Overcoming Fairness Trade-offs via Pre-processing: A Causal Perspective

    stat.ML 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using the FiND world, a hypothetical fair world where protected attributes have no causal effect on the target, the authors show that fairness metrics become compatible and fairness aligns with accuracy, and that pre-...

Pith tools