REVIEW 4 cited by
Causality for Machine Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Causality for Machine Learning
read the original abstract
Graphical causal inference as pioneered by Judea Pearl arose from research on artificial intelligence (AI), and for a long time had little connection to the field of machine learning. This article discusses where links have been and should be established, introducing key concepts along the way. It argues that the hard open problems of machine learning and AI are intrinsically related to causality, and explains how the field is beginning to understand them.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Sensorimotor World Models: Perception for Action via Inverse Dynamics
SMWM trains end-to-end latent world models from offline reward-free data using inverse dynamics regularization to prevent collapse and align states with controllable actions for planning.
-
Breaking the Epistemic Trap: Active Perception Under Compound Uncertainty
The paper defines the Epistemic Trap from interacting state and dynamics uncertainties in RL and introduces an Adaptive Safety Architecture with a Compound Uncertainty Coefficient to enable active information-seeking ...
-
Breaking the Epistemic Trap: Active Perception Under Compound Uncertainty
The paper proposes an Adaptive Safety Architecture with a mutual-information-based Compound Uncertainty Coefficient, MaxInfoRL policies, and adaptive constraints to actively resolve compound epistemic uncertainty in R...
-
Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problems
Offline RL promises to extract high-utility policies from static datasets but faces fundamental challenges that current methods only partially address.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.