REVIEW 2 cited by
Founding The Domain of AI Forensics
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
With the widespread integration of AI in everyday and critical technologies, it seems inevitable to witness increasing instances of failure in AI systems. In such cases, there arises a need for technical investigations that produce legally acceptable and scientifically indisputable findings and conclusions on the causes of such failures. Inspired by the domain of cyber forensics, this paper introduces the need for the establishment of AI Forensics as a new discipline under AI safety. Furthermore, we propose a taxonomy of the subfields under this discipline, and present a discussion on the foundational challenges that lay ahead of this new research area.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
AI Forensics Across White-, Grey-, and Black-Box Access: A Process Model and Research Agenda for Post-Incident Investigation of AI Systems
A position paper arguing that investigator access should be the primary organizing axis for AI forensics, with a process model matrix, an order of volatility, and a research agenda.
-
Exploring the Robustness of AI-Driven Tools in Digital Forensics: A Preliminary Study
Commercial AI forensic classifiers mislabel a notable share of non-standard images, so human oversight remains necessary.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.