REVIEW 1 cited by
Learning from Learning Machines: Optimisation, Rules, and Social Norms
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
There is an analogy between machine learning systems and economic entities in that they are both adaptive, and their behaviour is specified in a more-or-less explicit way. It appears that the area of AI that is most analogous to the behaviour of economic entities is that of morally good decision-making, but it is an open question as to how precisely moral behaviour can be achieved in an AI system. This paper explores the analogy between these two complex systems, and we suggest that a clearer understanding of this apparent analogy may help us forward in both the socio-economic domain and the AI domain: known results in economics may help inform feasible solutions in AI safety, but also known results in AI may inform economic policy. If this claim is correct, then the recent successes of deep learning for AI suggest that more implicit specifications work better than explicit ones for solving such problems.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
AI Ethics and Social Norms: Exploring ChatGPT's Capabilities From What to How
A cross-country survey and interview study finds that ChatGPT users and experts perceive transparency, bias, and data collection as the main ethical concerns, and that perceptions differ across groups for trust, secur...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.