Pith. sign in

REVIEW

High-parallelism Inception-like Spiking Neural Networks for Unsupervised Feature Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2001.01680 v5 pith:UDAA7B5E submitted 2019-12-02 cs.NE cs.LGq-bio.NCstat.ML

High-parallelism Inception-like Spiking Neural Networks for Unsupervised Feature Learning

classification cs.NE cs.LGq-bio.NCstat.ML
keywords learningsnnsarchitecturedecodingnetworksneuralspikespiking
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) are brain-inspired, event-driven machine learning algorithms that have been widely recognized in producing ultra-high-energy-efficient hardware. Among existing SNNs, unsupervised SNNs based on synaptic plasticity, especially Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity (STDP), are considered to have great potential in imitating the learning process of the biological brain. Nevertheless, the existing STDP-based SNNs have limitations in constrained learning capability and/or slow learning speed. Most STDP-based SNNs adopted a slow-learning Fully-Connected (FC) architecture and used a sub-optimal vote-based scheme for spike decoding. In this paper, we overcome these limitations with: 1) a design of high-parallelism network architecture, inspired by the Inception module in Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs); 2) use of a Vote-for-All (VFA) decoding layer as a replacement to the standard vote-based spike decoding scheme, to reduce the information loss in spike decoding and, 3) a proposed adaptive repolarization (resetting) mechanism that accelerates SNNs' learning by enhancing spiking activities. Our experimental results on two established benchmark datasets (MNIST/EMNIST) show that our network architecture resulted in superior performance compared to the widely used FC architecture and a more advanced Locally-Connected (LC) architecture, and that our SNN achieved competitive results with state-of-the-art unsupervised SNNs (95.64%/80.11% accuracy on the MNIST/EMNISE dataset) while having superior learning efficiency and robustness against hardware damage. Our SNN achieved great classification accuracy with only hundreds of training iterations, and random destruction of large numbers of synapses or neurons only led to negligible performance degradation.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.