Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Fundamental Tradeoffs between Invariance and Sensitivity to Adversarial Perturbations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2002.04599 v2 pith:QN5CD76C submitted 2020-02-11 cs.LG cs.CRcs.CVstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.CRcs.CVstat.ML
keywords adversarialexamplesinputmodelattackschangesfundamentalintroduce
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Adversarial examples are malicious inputs crafted to induce misclassification. Commonly studied sensitivity-based adversarial examples introduce semantically-small changes to an input that result in a different model prediction. This paper studies a complementary failure mode, invariance-based adversarial examples, that introduce minimal semantic changes that modify an input's true label yet preserve the model's prediction. We demonstrate fundamental tradeoffs between these two types of adversarial examples. We show that defenses against sensitivity-based attacks actively harm a model's accuracy on invariance-based attacks, and that new approaches are needed to resist both attack types. In particular, we break state-of-the-art adversarially-trained and certifiably-robust models by generating small perturbations that the models are (provably) robust to, yet that change an input's class according to human labelers. Finally, we formally show that the existence of excessively invariant classifiers arises from the presence of overly-robust predictive features in standard datasets.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools