Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Politics of Adversarial Machine Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2002.05648 v3 pith:ZSZTM5SK submitted 2020-02-01 cs.CY cs.CRcs.LGstat.ML

classification cs.CYcs.CRcs.LGstat.ML
keywords adversarialattackshumanlearningmachinerightssystemsdefenses
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In addition to their security properties, adversarial machine-learning attacks and defenses have political dimensions. They enable or foreclose certain options for both the subjects of the machine learning systems and for those who deploy them, creating risks for civil liberties and human rights. In this paper, we draw on insights from science and technology studies, anthropology, and human rights literature, to inform how defenses against adversarial attacks can be used to suppress dissent and limit attempts to investigate machine learning systems. To make this concrete, we use real-world examples of how attacks such as perturbation, model inversion, or membership inference can be used for socially desirable ends. Although the predictions of this analysis may seem dire, there is hope. Efforts to address human rights concerns in the commercial spyware industry provide guidance for similar measures to ensure ML systems serve democratic, not authoritarian ends

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Position: Certified Robustness Does Not (Yet) Imply Model Security

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A certified robustness radius says nothing about whether a sample is clean or correctly predicted, so certification does not yet imply model security.

Pith tools