REVIEW 3 cited by
BatchEnsemble: An Alternative Approach to Efficient Ensemble and Lifelong Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
BatchEnsemble: An Alternative Approach to Efficient Ensemble and Lifelong Learning
read the original abstract
Ensembles, where multiple neural networks are trained individually and their predictions are averaged, have been shown to be widely successful for improving both the accuracy and predictive uncertainty of single neural networks. However, an ensemble's cost for both training and testing increases linearly with the number of networks, which quickly becomes untenable. In this paper, we propose BatchEnsemble, an ensemble method whose computational and memory costs are significantly lower than typical ensembles. BatchEnsemble achieves this by defining each weight matrix to be the Hadamard product of a shared weight among all ensemble members and a rank-one matrix per member. Unlike ensembles, BatchEnsemble is not only parallelizable across devices, where one device trains one member, but also parallelizable within a device, where multiple ensemble members are updated simultaneously for a given mini-batch. Across CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, WMT14 EN-DE/EN-FR translation, and out-of-distribution tasks, BatchEnsemble yields competitive accuracy and uncertainties as typical ensembles; the speedup at test time is 3X and memory reduction is 3X at an ensemble of size 4. We also apply BatchEnsemble to lifelong learning, where on Split-CIFAR-100, BatchEnsemble yields comparable performance to progressive neural networks while having a much lower computational and memory costs. We further show that BatchEnsemble can easily scale up to lifelong learning on Split-ImageNet which involves 100 sequential learning tasks.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Reducing Bias and Variance: Generative Semantic Guidance and Bi-Layer Ensemble for Image Clustering
GSEC uses MLLM-generated semantic guidance and bi-layer ensemble learning to reduce bias and variance, outperforming 18 prior methods on six image clustering benchmarks.
-
Reducing Bias and Variance: Generative Semantic Guidance and Bi-Layer Ensemble for Image Clustering
GSEC uses MLLM-generated semantic descriptions and a bi-layer ensemble (BatchEnsemble inner layer plus alignment outer layer) to reduce bias and variance, outperforming 18 prior methods on six image clustering benchmarks.
-
Set-based v.s. Distribution-based Representations of Epistemic Uncertainty: A Comparative Study
Built from identical predictive distributions, distribution-based and credal-set uncertainty representations are comparable, but their rankings depend heavily on the chosen uncertainty measure and downstream task.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.