Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

BatchEnsemble: An Alternative Approach to Efficient Ensemble and Lifelong Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2002.06715 v2 pith:3VTDJFTS submitted 2020-02-17 cs.LG stat.ML

BatchEnsemble: An Alternative Approach to Efficient Ensemble and Lifelong Learning

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords batchensembleensembleensembleslearningnetworkslifelongmemoryneural
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Ensembles, where multiple neural networks are trained individually and their predictions are averaged, have been shown to be widely successful for improving both the accuracy and predictive uncertainty of single neural networks. However, an ensemble's cost for both training and testing increases linearly with the number of networks, which quickly becomes untenable. In this paper, we propose BatchEnsemble, an ensemble method whose computational and memory costs are significantly lower than typical ensembles. BatchEnsemble achieves this by defining each weight matrix to be the Hadamard product of a shared weight among all ensemble members and a rank-one matrix per member. Unlike ensembles, BatchEnsemble is not only parallelizable across devices, where one device trains one member, but also parallelizable within a device, where multiple ensemble members are updated simultaneously for a given mini-batch. Across CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, WMT14 EN-DE/EN-FR translation, and out-of-distribution tasks, BatchEnsemble yields competitive accuracy and uncertainties as typical ensembles; the speedup at test time is 3X and memory reduction is 3X at an ensemble of size 4. We also apply BatchEnsemble to lifelong learning, where on Split-CIFAR-100, BatchEnsemble yields comparable performance to progressive neural networks while having a much lower computational and memory costs. We further show that BatchEnsemble can easily scale up to lifelong learning on Split-ImageNet which involves 100 sequential learning tasks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Reducing Bias and Variance: Generative Semantic Guidance and Bi-Layer Ensemble for Image Clustering

    cs.CV 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0

    GSEC uses MLLM-generated semantic guidance and bi-layer ensemble learning to reduce bias and variance, outperforming 18 prior methods on six image clustering benchmarks.

  2. Reducing Bias and Variance: Generative Semantic Guidance and Bi-Layer Ensemble for Image Clustering

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    GSEC uses MLLM-generated semantic descriptions and a bi-layer ensemble (BatchEnsemble inner layer plus alignment outer layer) to reduce bias and variance, outperforming 18 prior methods on six image clustering benchmarks.

  3. Set-based v.s. Distribution-based Representations of Epistemic Uncertainty: A Comparative Study

    cs.LG 2026-02 conditional novelty 5.0

    Built from identical predictive distributions, distribution-based and credal-set uncertainty representations are comparable, but their rankings depend heavily on the chosen uncertainty measure and downstream task.